NUR 504 Week 3 Discussions 2: Qualitative Design

NUR 504 Week 3 Discussions 2: Qualitative Design

NUR 504 Week 3 Discussions 2: Qualitative Design

Describe the qualitative design (or methodology) of the article you selected. Present the strengths and limitations of this type of design according to the textbook and how these are reflected in your study. Contrast the design you have selected with at least one design presented by a classmate in one of your responses.

Week 3 Assignment

Write a summary of each of the articles that you identified in Module 2.

Address the following:

1. 1. Write one research summary that uses a quantitative research design.
   2. Write one research summary that uses a qualitative research design.
   3. Each summary should be 250-500 words and should follow the template, Summarize Research Articles.
   4. Use APA Level Heading 2 to separate the distinct parts of the study.

These article summaries will form the basis of the Critique of Research Studies Parts 1-3 assignments in modules 4, 6, and 8.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. NUR 504 Week 3 Discussions 2: Qualitative Design.

GC NUR 504 Discussion Assignment Essay Papers – Summarize Research Articles

Directions: Use the templates below when summarizing your research articles. Include a cover page, and start a new page for each article summary. Use level 1 and 2 headings when composing the summaries to separate distinct parts.

Title of Quantitative Article

(Example of text: This article was authored by Watson and James and published in the Journal of Nursing Research in 2008. This article was selected as an example of a quasi-experimental design. The model summary selected for this paper is found on page 90 to 91of the textbook. This is a summary of a quasi-experimental study in which though there is a comparison group; subjects were not randomly assigned to groups. The research article being summarized also is an experiment that used a comparison group without randomization.)

• • Problem Statement

• • Statement of Purpose

• • Research Question(s)/Hypothesis

• • Study Methods

• • Key Findings

• • Citation

Title of Qualitative Article

(Example of text: Ramirez (2008) studied adolescent depression and the influence of significant adults on the course of the depression. The model summary utilized is found on page 91of the textbook. It was selected because it is an example of a grounded theory study as is the article selected.)

• • Problem Statement

• • Statement of Purpose

• • Research Question(s)

• • Method

• • Key Findings

• • Citation

NUR 504 Week 4 Discussions 1 & 2 Essay Papers

Read the section Questionnaires versus Interviews on pages 305-306 in the textbook. How are these guidelines similar and different from data collected by nurses when giving care? What principles did you identify that are new to you but could be important in improving your collection of clinical data?

NUR 504 Week 4 Discussion 2 Essay Paper

You are interested in nurses’ attitudes toward EBP. Which method do you think would work best to obtain this information: a questionnaire, a face-to-face interview, or a group interview? Defend your answer.

Week 4 Assignment

This is a CLC assignment.

Follow the instructions provided in “CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP).”

Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents in Topic 5 as the CLC assignment.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

	Name of Article	Name of Article	Name of Article	Name of Article
Levels of Evidence
Study Design
Variable to be studied
Variable to be studied
Variable to be studied

Compare template above to my table below. At a glance you can see the names of the most important articles I choose, the level of evidence of that study, what the design was, and what variables were important to know about in each article. As you study the table, the reader can clearly see more studies in support of BiPAP than IS along with other information that would be of interest to the provider to support standards of care.

Table 2 Synthesis of IS and NIPPV Evidence /Types of Surgery

Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies Instructions.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. NUR 504 Week 4 Discussions 1 & 2 Essay Papers.

Critique of Research Studies Instructions

Directions:

Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Module 3.

This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part.

Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook.

1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles.

2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3.

3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research.

When turning in the final submission, please put in the the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources).

ORDER NOW FOR A RESOURCEFUL, CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER

Critique of Research Studies – Part 1: Due Module 4

For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative	Qualitative
· Title	· Title
· Abstract	· Abstract
· Introduction	· Introduction
o Statement of the problem	o Statement of the problem
o Hypotheses or research questions	o Research questions
o Literature review	o Literature review
o Conceptual/theoretical framework	o Conceptual underpinnings

Critique of Research Studies – Part 2: Due Module 6

For Part 2 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative	Qualitative
· Method	· Method
o Protection of human rights	o Protection of participants’ rights
o Research design	o Research design and research tradition
o Population and sample	o Sample and setting
o Data collection and measurement	o Data collection
o Procedures	o Procedures
	o Enhancement of trustworthiness

Critique of Research Studies – Part 3: Due Module 8

For Part 3 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative	Qualitative
· Results	· Results
o Data analysis	o Data analysis
o Findings	o Findings
· Discussion	o Theoretical integrations
o Interpretation of findings	· Discussion
o Implications/recommendations	o Interpretation of the findings
· Global Issues	o Implications/recommendations
o Presentation	· Global Issues
o Researcher credibility	o Presentation
o Summary assessment	o Researcher credibility
	o Summary assessment

NUR 504 Week 5 Discussions 1 & 2 Assignment Papers

Demographic data is collected for every study. What is the purpose of describing the demographic data?

NUR 504 Week 5 Discussion 2 Essay Paper

There is a tendency for novice researchers to develop their own instrument if they cannot readily find one. How might you respond to a peer or manager who asks you to help develop a new tool to collect patient data on anxiety prior to cardiac catheterization?

GC NUR 504 Discussion Assignment Essay Papers – Week 5 Assignment

This is a CLC assignment.

Follow the instructions provided in CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP).

Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents for this week’s CLC assignment.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Name of Article	Name of Article	Name of Article	Name of Article
Levels of Evidence
Study Design
Variable to be studied
Variable to be studied
Variable to be studied

Compare template above to my table below. At a glance you can see the names of the most important articles I choose, the level of evidence of that study, what the design was, and what variables were important to know about in each article. As you study the table, the reader can clearly see more studies in support of BiPAP than IS along with other information that would be of interest to the provider to support standards of care.

Table 2 Synthesis of IS and NIPPV Evidence /Types of Surgery

NUR 504 Week 6 Discussions 1 Assignment Paper

State in your own words what is meant by Type I and Type II errors. Why are these important? Name one thing that can be done to improve internal validity of a study.

ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

NUR 504 Week 6 Discussion 2 Assignment Paper

An example of a multivariate procedure is analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Explain what is meant by the following statement: ANCOVA offers post hoc statistical control. Provide an example. NUR 504 Week 3 Discussions 2: Qualitative Design.

Week 6 Assignment

Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies Instructions.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Critique of Research Studies Instructions

Directions:

Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Topic 3.

This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part.

Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook or the Research Critique Additional Template Resource.

1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles.

2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3.

3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research.

When turning in the final submission, please put in the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources).

NUR 504 Week 7 Discussion 1 Essay Paper

In the final section of study reports, there is a section on implications and recommendations. Describe the difference between these terms. Provide examples from one of the studies that you critiqued.

NUR 504 Week 7 Discussion 2 

Researchers have a responsibility to identify the limitations of a study. What is meant by limitation? Provide examples from one of the studies that you critiqued.

NUR 504 Week 8 Discussion 1 Essay paper

Post your group’s CLC EBP project. Critically read two CLC EBP projects (other than your own). Name one barrier for each that could impact the implementation of the guideline in practice and how you would work through this issue.

Week 7 Assignment

This is a CLC assignment.

Follow the instructions provided “CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP).”

Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence, and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents at the completion of the CLC assignment.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

NUR-504: Table of Evidence

	Study 1	Study 2	Study 3	Study 4	Study 5
Author
Study title
Research Questions
Design
Setting/Sample
Methods: intervention/instruments
Analysis
Key findings
Recommendations
How this supports EBP/Capstone

NUR 504 Week 8 Discussion 2 Comprehensive Solution

Discuss what is meant by mixed-methods designs. What are the limitations of these designs.

GC NUR 504 Discussion Assignment Essay Papers : Week 8 Assignment – EBP Project Evaluation

Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies instructions.

When turning in the final submission, please put in the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources).

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. NUR 504 Week 3 Discussions 2: Qualitative Design.

ORDER NOW FOR A RESOURCEFUL, CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER

Critique of Research Studies Instructions

Directions:

Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Topic 3.

This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part.

Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook or the Research Critique Additional Template Resource.

1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles.

2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3.

3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research.

When turning in the final submission, please put in thefollowing order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources).

Critique of Research Studies – Part 1: Due Topic 4

For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative	Qualitative
· Title	· Title
· Abstract	· Abstract
· Introduction	· Introduction
o Statement of the problem	o Statement of the problem
o Hypotheses or research questions	o Research questions
o Literature review	o Literature review
o Conceptual/theoretical framework	o Conceptual underpinnings

Critique of Research Studies – Part 2: Due Topic 6

For Part 2 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative	Qualitative
· Method	· Method
o Protection of human rights	o Protection of participants’ rights
o Research design	o Research design and research tradition
o Population and sample	o Sample and setting
o Data collection and measurement	o Data collection
o Procedures	o Procedures
	o Enhancement of trustworthiness

Critique of Research Studies – Part 3: Due Topic 8

For Part 3 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative	Qualitative
· Results	· Results
o Data analysis	o Data analysis
o Findings o Reliability and Validity	o Findings
· Discussion	o Theoretical integrations
o Interpretation of findings	· Discussion
o Implications/recommendations	o Interpretation of the findings
· Global Issues	o Implications/recommendations
o Presentation	· Global Issues
o Researcher credibility	o Presentation
o Summary assessment	o Researcher credibility
	o Summary assessment

Activity Mode aims to provide quality study notes and tutorials to the students of GC NUR 504 Discussion Assignment Essay Papers New in order to ace their studies.

Activity Mode – Best Home Work Tutorials