NUR 504 Week 7 Discussion – implications and recommendations

NUR 504 Week 7 Discussion – implications and recommendations

NUR 504 Week 7 Discussion – implications and recommendations

In the final section of study reports, there is a section on implications and recommendations. Describe the difference between these terms. Provide examples from one of the studies that you critiqued.


NUR 504 Solutions also available for:

NUR 504 Week 7 Discussions 2

Researchers have a responsibility to identify the limitations of a study. What is meant by limitation? Provide examples from one of the studies that you critiqued.

NUR 504 Week 8 Discussions 1

Post your group’s CLC EBP project. Critically read two CLC EBP projects (other than your own). Name one barrier for each that could impact the implementation of the guideline in practice and how you would work through this issue.

NUR 504 Week 8 Discussions 2

Discuss what is meant by mixed-methods designs. What are the limitations of these designs.

Topic 3:

Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Identification of Clinical Question

1) Refer to Figure 2.2 in the textbook for the model you will use to complete this project.

  1. Note that you will not complete the entire process in this model, you will reach the step entitled,Pilot the change in practice.

2) As a group, finalize your choice of topic.

  1. Review the literature regarding clinical problems presented in the previous topic in order to ensure that there is adequate evidence for your choice.
  2. State your topic in the form of a problem statement and a foreground question.
  3. The course readings include all of the information you need to complete this project.
  4. Record all communication in the CLC Forum.

3) Choose one team member to submit the completed assignment and initial reference list to the instructor by the end of Topic 4.

Topic 4:

Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Literature Search/Appraisal of Evidence

1) Use Figure 2.1, Evidence hierarchy pyramid, in the textbook as your guide for the levels of evidence in your reference list.

2) Locate case studies, relevant clinical articles written by experts, research articles,, evidence based guidelines and protocolsand theory that may guide the identification of appropriate solutions. This can include the articles reviewed from topic 3. Note, not all theories will have research that allows them to have a level assigned to them. This does not mean they are not good theories.

3) Appraise the evidence using the guidelines provided on pages 37-40 in the textbook.

  1. Use these guidelines to discard references that are untrustworthy or irrelevant.
  2. Use Box 2.2 to help with this decision-making process.

4) Use the following to organize the evidence by commonalities and/or contrary findings:

  1. Chapter 5 in the textbook provides information regarding how to synthesize the article findings.
  2. Use the EBP Project Evaluation tool located in resources to consolidate and present the findings

5) Record all communication in the CLC Forum.