NRS 451V Week 1 Professional Resume and Cover Letter
NRS 451V Week 1 Professional Resume and Cover Letter
Permalink: https://ulcius.com/nrs-451v-week-1-…and-cover-letter/
Details for NRS 451V Week 1 Professional Resume and Cover Letter:
Write an introductory cover letter of no more than 500 words in which you explain your professional objectives, professional interests, and strengths as an applicant.
Create a resume detailing your license(s), earned degree(s), certification(s), professional experiences, previous positions held, membership in professional organizations, publications, and skills.
Both the cover letter and resume should be formally written using a professionally accepted format. Review “Resume Resources,” located at for http://www.resume-resource.com/examples-medical.html for examples of approved formats; however, other professional templates may be used.
Share your resume with a colleague and elicit their feedback. Revise your resume if needed and submit the resume in the assignment section of the course.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This NRS 451V Week 1 Professional Resume and Cover Letter assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are not required to submit this NRS 451V Week 1 Professional Resume and Cover Letter assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
NRS 451V Week 2 Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management
Details:
In this assignment, you will be writing a 1,000-1,250-word essay describing the differing approaches of nursing leaders and managers to issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:
1. Select an issue from the following list: nursing shortage and nurse turn-over, nurse staffing ratios, unit closures and restructuring, use of contract employees (i.e., registry and travel nurses), continuous quality improvement and patient satisfaction, and magnet designation.
2. Compare and contrast how you would expect nursing leaders and managers to approach your selected issue. Support your rationale by using the theories, principles, skills, and roles of the leader versus manager described in your readings.
3. Identify the approach that best fits your personal and professional philosophy of nursing and explain why the approach is suited to your personal leadership style.
4. Use at least two references other than your text and those provided in the course.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
NRS 451v Week 3 Executive Summary Benchmark Assessment
Executive Summary (Benchmark Assessment)
Details:
The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by CCNE and AACN using non-traditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, their specific care discipline and their local communities.
In this assignment, you will select a program, quality improvement initiative, or other project from your place of employment. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (850-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which they will make their decision to fund your program or project. The summary should include:
The purpose of the program or project.
The target population or audience.
The benefits of the program or project
The cost or budget justification.
The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated.
Share your written proposal with your manager, supervisor or other colleague in a formal leadership position within a health care organization. Request their feedback using the following questions as prompts:
Do you believe the proposal would be approved if formally proposed?
What are some strengths and weaknesses of the proposal?
In addition to submitting this assignment in the LoudCloud dropbox, email a copy of your submission to RNBSNclientcare@gcu.edu.
Submit the written proposal along with the “Executive Summary Feedback Form.”
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
NRS 451v Week 4 Organizational Values Presentation GC
Organizational Values Presentation (Benchmark Assessment)
Details:
Prepare a 10-minute presentation (10-15 slides, not including title or reference slide) on organizational culture and values.
Describe how alignment between the values of an organization and the values of the nurse impact nurse engagement and patient outcomes.
Discuss how an individual can use effective communication techniques to overcome workplace challenges, encourage collaboration across groups, and promote effective problem solving.
Identify a specific instance from your own professional experience in which the values of the organization and the values of the individual nurses did or did not align. Describe the impact this had on nurse engagement and patient outcomes.
While APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Health Organization Case Study
Details:
Research a health care organization or a network that spans several states within the U.S. (Example: United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Healthcare, etc.).
Harvard Business Review Online and Hoover’s Company Records, found in the GCU Library, are useful sources. You may also find pertinent information on your organization’s webpage.
Review “Singapore Airlines Case Study.”
Prepare a 1,000-1,250-word paper that focuses on the organization or network you have selected.
Your essay should assess the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade, and include a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Grading Criteria: Design for Change Capstone Project
Category | Points | % | Description |
Introduction | 25 | 11% | Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, with evidence-based problem identification and potential solutions clearly identified. |
Change Model Overview | 50 | 22% | Practice issue is identified and is nursing focused. An overview of the ACE Star model is given. The need for change is evident. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and their role are identified and discussed. Scope of the problem is identified. State how nurses should use this model as a guide to facilitate change. |
Evidence | 50 | 22% | Evidence is provided thru basic information that indicates a change is needed. For example, there have been 6 urinary tract infections over the last two months and there were none present the last two years at the same time period. What are some of the evidence-based interventions you discovered in your Evidence Summary that do you plan to use? |
Translation | 50 | 22% | Activities to achieve the final steps of change are fully described. What is needed to achieve. How do you translate what information you have gathered into practice? How do you inform staff? What is your plan of action to pilot the plan? What is the timeline? |
Conclusion | 25 | 11% | Clear, solid summary summarizing the key points and steps of the change plan is included; ways to sustain the change plan are described. |
APA Format | 25 | 11% | Minimal errors. |
Total | 225 points | 100% |
Grading Rubric: Capstone Project Milestone 2
Assignment Criteria | A (100%)Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance |
B (88%)Exceeds
Very good or high level of performance |
C (80%)Meets
Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
NI (38%)Needs Improvement
Poor or failing level of performance |
F (0%)Developing
Unsatisfactory level of performance |
||
Introduction
25 points |
Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, and evidence-based.
Potential interventions clearly identified.25 points ☐ |
Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, and evidence-based solutions identified but not clear.
22 points ☐ |
Introduction to the plan is provided; however, the plan is not nursing focused and evidence-based solutions are not convincing.20 points ☐ | Introduction lacks evidence to support need for change and/or potential solution is not evidenced-based.
10 points ☐ |
Introduction is missing.
0 points ☐ |
||
Change Model Overview50 points | Practice issue is nursing focused.
Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is present. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed. Scope of problem is identified. 50 points ☐ |
Practice issue is nursing focused. Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present.
Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed. Scope of problem is identified. 44 points ☐ |
Practice issue is nursing focused.
Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present. Stakeholders are not identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed but without detail. Scope of problem is identified. 40 points ☐ |
Practice issue is nursing focused.
Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present. Stakeholders are not identified. Practice area, team members and role are not discussed. Scope of problem is identified. 19 points ☐ |
Change Model Overview is missing
0 points ☐ |
||
Evidence 50 points | Evidence is thoroughly provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed.
Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.50 points ☐ |
Evidence is briefly provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Some of the interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.44 points ☐ | Evidence is vaguely provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed.
Some of the interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.40 points ☐ |
Evidence is provided thru basic information of the current problem but is not convincing. Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are not used in planning for change.19 points ☐ | Evidence is not provided thru basic information of the current problem; there is no indication of change; there no interventions listed from the Evidence Summary.
0 points ☐ |
||
Translation 50 points | Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described. Ways to translate evidence into practice is discussed.
Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action and timeline are discussed. 50 points ☐ |
Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described. How to translate evidence into practice is discussed but is not clear.Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action and timeline are discussed.
44 points ☐ |
Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described. How to translate evidence into practice is not discussed.
Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action but timeline is not mentioned. 40 points ☐ |
Activities to achieve final steps of change are described but not in detail.How to translate evidence into practice is not discussed.
Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action but timeline is not mentioned. 19 points ☐ |
Activities for final change plan is missing. Translation of evidence into practice is missing.0 points ☐ | ||
Conclusion25 points | Detailed summary of main points.Ways to sustain plan are thoroughly described.25 points ☐ | Summary of main points is brief.Ways to sustain plan are briefly described.22 points ☐ | Summary of main points is vague.Ways to sustain plan are vaguely described.20 points ☐ | Summary of main points is vague.Ways to sustain change are not described.10 points ☐ | Summary is missing. There is no plan to sustain change.0 points ☐ | ||
APA formatting, scholarly writing25 points | APA format sixth edition.Grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling correct.References, citations correct.
Paper formatted in APA format. No errors to one error. 25 points ☐ |
Two to three errors.22 points ☐ | Four to five errors.20 points ☐ | Six to seven errors.10 points ☐ | More than seven errors.0 points ☐ | ||
Total Points | |||||||