NR535 Week 7 Assignment: Case Study
NR535 Week 7 Assignment: Case Study
Case Study Discussion Grading Rubric
Guidelines & Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity for learners to: (a) articular key questions to be asked in a grievance; (b) review an academic integrity policy; (c) determine a decision in a grievance process.
Course Outcomes:
CO 5. Examine professional ethical legal values in the role of the nurse educator (PO 4)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points Possible: 100
Requirements:
Week 7: Case Study Part I
The case study has three distinct parts. Each part of the case study will open and close on specific days of the week.
Part I of the case study opens on Sunday and will close on Wednesday of the week. You cannot add additional information to Part I once it closes on Wednesday. In this part of the case study you are to identify a 2 key questions for the student relevant to the grievance and 2 key questions for the faculty member. Include the rational for these questions. A scholarly article supporting this part of the discussion is to be included in the initial post.
KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
Part II will open on Wednesday of the week and close on Saturday of the week. You cannot add additional information to Part II once it closes on Saturday. In this part of the case study, you are to review a minimum of one policy for plagiarism at your school. Please identify three key points in the policy. (Note: to complete this part of the case study, please search for an academic integrity policy from any nursing program and use that in the discussion. Provide the web address of the policy and school).
Part III will open on Thursday of the week and close on Sunday of the week. In this part of the case study, you are to summarize three (3) key points in determining a decision in a grievance. You are to make a clearly identified decision about this grievance.
There are to be a minimum of 5 total posts in the case study: Part one of the case study: Initial post and peer response; Part two of the case study: Initial post and peer response; Part three of the case study: Initial post. NR535 Week 7 Assignment: Case Study
Process:
- Review the instructions for the case study.
- You will be graded on both the content of the presentation and the professional presentation.
Case Study
| Category | Points | % | Description |
| Support from Scholarly Literature | 10 | 10 | A minimum of one scholarly article relevant to the discussion is posted in part one of the case study. |
| Application of Course Knowledge: Part One Key Questions and Rationale | 15 | 15 | Two key questions for students and two key questions for faculty are identified and a rational for each question is clearly provided |
| Application of Course Knowledge: Part Two Academic Integrity
|
15 | 15 | An academic integrity with key points is clearly identified |
| Findings and Decision | 15 | 15 | Summarized the case study and clearly presented three (3) key points for nurse educators. A decision in the case is identified |
| Interactive Dialogue
|
30 | 30 | Responds substantively to at least two topic-related posts of a student peer (one post in Part I and one post in Part II) |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA Format and Organization
|
15 | 15 | APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero errors AND Posts present information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, clearly relevant to the case study |
| Total | 100 Points | 100% |
KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
Grading Rubric Case Study – Part I
| Case Study Discussion Criterion | Outstanding or highest level of performance | Very good or high level of performance | Competent or satisfactory level of performance | Poor or failing level of performance | Unsatisfactory level of performance | |
|
Support from Scholarly Literature |
10 points | 9 points | 7 points | 3 points | 0 points | |
| Includes at least 1 scholarly article in the first part of the case study to support the discussion. | Includes 1 scholarly article in the first part of the case study; however the article only vaguely supports the discussion | Includes 1 scholarly article in the first part of the case study; however the article does not support the discussion. | Includes an article in the first part of the case study however the source listed is not scholarly | There is no article listed in the first part of the case study. | ||
|
Application of Course Knowledge: Part One Key Questions and Rationale
|
15 points | 13 points | 10 points | 8 points | 0 points | |
| Two key questions for students and two key questions for faculty are identified and a rational for each question is clearly provided.
|
Two key questions for students and two key questions for faculty are identified and a rational for each question is clearly provided. However, at least one question has limited application to the case study.
|
Two key questions for students and two key questions for faculty are identified but the rationale provided is not clear.
OR Two questions and rationale are provided for both students and faculty but not all of the questions and rationale are clear and relevant to the case study |
Questions and rationale are present but are not relevant to the case study
OR Questions for students and faculty are identified but no rationale is provided. OR Only one question is present for students and faculty with clear rationale. NR535 Week 7 Assignment: Case Study
|
Questions for students and faculty are not identified. | ||
|
Interactive Dialogue
|
15 points | 13 points | 10 points | 8 points | 0 points | |
| Responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a student peer | Responds to one topic-related post of a student peer but the response is only minimally substantive | Responds to student peers, but the nature of the response to topic related posts is not substantive | Responds to student peers, but the topic is not related to the case study. | Does not respond to any topic-related posts of student peers. | ||
|
Grammar, Syntax, APA Format and Organization
|
5 points | 4 points | 3 points | 2 points | 0 points | |
| APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate with zero errors.
AND
Posts present information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, clearly relevant to the case study in all posts. |
One error in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation noted. AND
Posts present information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, clearly relevant to the case study |
2 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are noted. OR
Posts present case study findings but is sometimes difficult to follow, and may not always be relevant to topic |
3 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are noted. OR
Posts present case study findings but is sometimes difficult to follow, and may not always be relevant to topic |
Post contains four or more errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. OR
Posts are not relevant to case study |
||
| Total Participation Requirements | 0 points deducted | -5 points | ||||
| The student posts a minimum of 5 times as indicated:
1. Part One of the case study = 2 posts (initial and a peer)
|
The student did not meet the required number of postings per part of the case study (regardless of the total number of posts). | |||||
| Early Participation | 0 points deducted | -5 points | ||||
| The student must provide a substantive answer to the first part of the case study by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | The student did not provide an answer to the first part of the case study by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | |||||
GRADING RUBRIC CASE STUDY – PART II
| Case Study Discussion Criterion | Outstanding or highest level of performance | Very good or high level of performance | Competent or satisfactory level of performance | Poor or failing level of performance | Unsatisfactory level of performance | |
| Part II
Application of Course Knowledge: Academic Integrity Policy
|
15 points | 13 points | 10 points | 8 points | 0 points | |
| An academic integrity policy with key points is clearly identified | An academic integrity policy is identified in the discussion however not all questions in the discussion are answered | An academic integrity policy is only vaguely described in the discussion. | An policy is identified however it is a course/school policy and not a specific academic integrity policy | There is no academic integrity policy identified. | ||
|
Interactive Dialogue
|
15 points | 13 points | 10 points | 8 points | 0 points | |
| Responds substantively to at least one topic-related posts of a student peer | Responds to one topic-related post of a student peer but the response is only minimally substantive | Responds to student peers, but the nature of the response to topic related posts is not substantive | Responds to student peers, but the topic is not related to the case study. NR535 Week 7 Assignment: Case Study | Does not respond to any topic-related posts of student peers. | ||
|
Grammar, Syntax, APA Format and Organization
|
5 points | 4 points | 3 points | 2 points | 0 points | |
| APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate with zero errors.
AND
Posts present information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, clearly relevant to the case study in all posts. |
One error in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation noted. AND
Posts present information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, clearly relevant to the case study |
2 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are noted. OR
Posts present case study findings but is sometimes difficult to follow, and may not always be relevant to topic |
3 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are noted. OR
Posts present case study findings but is sometimes difficult to follow, and may not always be relevant to topic |
Post contains four or more errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. OR
Posts are not relevant to case study |
||
| Total Participation Requirements | 0 points deducted | -5 points | ||||
| The student posts a minimum of 5 times as indicated:
Part Two of the case study = 2 posts (initial and a peer)
|
The student did not meet the required number of postings per part of the case study (regardless of the total number of posts). | |||||
KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
NR535 Week 7 Assignment: Case Study
Grading Rubric CASE STUDY – PART III
| Case Study Discussion Criterion | Outstanding or highest level of performance | Very good or high level of performance | Competent or satisfactory level of performance | Poor or failing level of performance | Unsatisfactory level of performance | |
|
Part III: Findings and Decision
|
15 points | 13 points | 10 points | 8 points | 0 points | |
| Summarized the case study and clearly presented three (3) key points for nurse educators.
A decision in the case is identified. |
Summarized the case study and presented two (2) key points for nurse educators.
A decision in the case is identified |
Summarized the case study and presented one (1) key point for nurse educators.
A decision in the case is identified. |
Summarized the case study and presented one (1) key point for nurse educators.
A decision in the case is not identified. |
No summary or key points included in the case study.
A decision in the case is not identified. |
||
|
Grammar, Syntax, APA Format and Organization
|
5 points | 4 points | 3 points | 2 points | 0 points | |
| APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate with zero errors.
AND
Posts present information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, clearly relevant to the case study in all posts. |
One error in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation noted. AND
Posts present information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, clearly relevant to the case study |
2 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are noted. OR
Posts present case study findings but is sometimes difficult to follow, and may not always be relevant to topic |
3 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are noted. OR
Posts present case study findings but is sometimes difficult to follow, and may not always be relevant to topic |
Post contains four or more errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. OR
Posts are not relevant to case study |
||
| Total Participation Requirements | 0 points deducted | -5 points | ||||
| The student posts a minimum of 5 times as indicated:
Part Three of the case study = 1 post. |
The student did not meet the required number of postings per part of the case study (regardless of the total number of posts). | |||||