PSYC 3272 Assignment: The Myth of Mirror Neurons

Question:

The aim of these two reflective essays is for you to engage critically with big ideas or issues relevant to social neuroscience. Because each assigned reading will have so many ideas and pieces of evidence, each of your reflective essays should focus on one central “idea” that you find stimulating in the book. Your essay should clearly show why you find this idea interesting and novel. You should also suggest an idea of a study or line of research that could follow up on your idea. Keep in mind that you may be asked to discuss your paper during class as well.

Sample Draft Solution:

Class of brain cells that found in the brain cells of monkeys. A group of Italian neuroscientists has discovered this from the cells of monkey in 1992. Later, the researchers presumed that the neuro-cells can be found even in the brain cells of human beings. Moreover, they have opined that the evolution of human language came from the evolution of human mirror cells. Moreover, it is stated that the mirror neurons are the key reasons for the development of human empathy and emotion (Alexandrov, 2009). However, I have observed that the human sensory targets are the results of the feedback of human experiences which opposes the inner link between human neurons and mirror neurons of the monkeys. I have understood that the mirror neurons help the monkeys to imitate others actions. I will enfold this study that the interesting factors of mirror neurons and its relativity with the actions of the human beings.

Moreover, this study will unfold the role of memory motor system and its simulation to achieve proper understanding. I have known that a human sensory-motor system works more efficiently than the mirror neurons (DeSalle & Tattersall, 2012).I have found this study interesting because it will unfold the motor responses of the sporting events in the case of understanding any serious issue. The mirror neuron is found interesting due to its capability to understand and imitate any actions and understand the consequences more easily. However, I have experienced several people try to imitate or copy others actions. It is arguable that whether this attitude is out of observational experiences or out of the effect of the existence of mirror neurons. I have found that the information that is gathered area stored mostly in the motor system. However, the motor system does not store any meaningless information. I have found it interesting that the motor theorists state that our observation of the information is completely based on the grounding of the motor system (Biggs, 2012).

On the contrary, the cognitive theorists claim that observed information is not completely based on the grounding the motor system; instead, it is the grasping of the overall concept of the information. Thus, I think the language capability is not by the born capability of the individuals. However, individuals learn from their experiences and aim to imitate the acts of others. I think trying or imitating to spell the unknown words are not as difficult as the sensory-motor saves the words and the actions that are gathered. The ability to speak or imitate others acts do not impact in the perceived contribution. However, I think it is more interesting than the actions contribute more to the external environment. For example, I have the ability to move to move my eyes round and round. I think hearing effects a lot to make the ability to shift the content position of the ear (Coleman, 2012). Thus, I presume that most of these habits are due to sensing the listening observations. I found it interesting that my ears are messed with auditory target speech. Due to this reason, the feedback is disrupted with the timing sent by the brain.

The sensory grounding speeches generally observe the motor speech behavior. I think this is significant because the difficulty in learning and speaking it has the courage to develop language that can be recognized easily.