NURS 6051 Week 7 Discussion – Three Workflow Concepts
NURS 6051 Week 7 Discussion – Three Workflow Concepts
Description
Three Workflow Concepts
One of the hospitals I got trained for by my agency company can definitely need some help in analyzing their workflow and IT use. When I trained there for two days, it would often
Usability Evaluation
A usability evaluation can highlight how NOT “user-friendly” the current system is at this
Benchmarking
Benchmarking by this facility would mean evaluating metrics and best practices from the
Interview
Straightforward and direct, interviews can be utilized to assess how the staff feels about
Research Article
The article to be covered is The Kaiser Permanente electronic health record:
Importance of Monitoring Effect of Technology
It is my understanding, the hospital in question implemented the current EHR just to be in
CLICK HERE TO ORDER NURS 6051 Week 7 Discussion – Three Workflow Concepts
RUBRIC
Grid View
List View
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
| Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. |
Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback: |
| Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. |
Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
No purpose statement was provided. Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. |
Points: Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources. |
Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to support point of view. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. |
Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback: |
NURS 6051 Week 7 Response (Walden)
Description
RESPONSE 1 WEEK 7
Good day,.
Thank you for your contribution to our weekly discussion. I agree with you when you state the importance of workflow. Particularly the disruption of the electronic workflow when …
RESPONSE 2 WEEK 7 posted fri
Good day,.
Thank you for your interesting post. I completely agree with you when you state the importance of efficient nurse workflow. Too often, technology and innovation can often add to …
NURS 6051 Week 8 Discussion (Walden)
Description
Practice Issue
The practice issue to be discussed in this paper is the use of needleless systems by nurses in the ICU. As a travel nurse across the south, I saw a significant disparity in different hospitals ….
Health IT Supporting Evidenced-Based Practice
As mentioned in this week’s reading assignment, gone are the days when nurses were dependent on local libraries and monthly journals. With the advent of the internet and the on-…
NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment (Walden)
Description
A Workflow Process for Call Light Management
Walden University
A Workflow Process for Call Light Management
Patient survey reports show that my unit struggles with our call light process, as this is a
Current Method
Our call light system allows for multiple, consecutive calls at a time, and sometimes it can be tough to answer and relay information promptly to the appropriate personnel. Usually, …
Measuring Tool
Rules
Improvements
Summary
NURS 6051 Week 8 Response (Walden)
Description
RESPONSE 1 WEEK 8
Good day,.
Thank you for your contribution to this week’s discussion. I completely agree with you on your point about 12-hour shift. Yes, they may be tiring those last 4 hours, but at least you get …
RESPONSE 2 WEEK 8
Good day,
Thank you for your interesting contribution to this week’s discussion. As an ICU nurse, I had not heard about HOUDINI before your writing of it. While researching the topic, it was great to see …
NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion (Walden)
Description
Impact of HITECH on My Organization
Overall, the impact of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health ACT of 2009 has been very positive at my current facility. The electronic health record …
Impact of Incentives and Meaningful Use
As listed above, meaningful use incentives are geared towards meeting the goals of …
Article of Successful Meaningful Use
One of the pivotal goals in meaningful use is decrease in medication errors. Nuckkols et al. wrote …
NURS 6051 Week 10 Discussion (Walden)
Description
RN PHI Responsibility
According to the American Nurses Association (ANA), protecting a patient’s …
PHI and Portable Devices
HealthIT.gov recommends NOT using portable storage devices to transport PHI due to the …
My Facility and PHI
University Hospital is a Magnet hospital, and it prides itself on using the best evidence-based …
NURS 6051 Week 10 Response (Walden)
Description
Good day,.
Thank you for your contribution to our discussion this week. It was interesting to hear the …
RESPONSE 2 WEEK 10
Good day,
Thank you for your interesting input on passwords and EHR security. Interestingly, Smith …
NURS 6051 Week 11 Discussion (Walden)
Description
Health Literacy Responsibility
According to the U. S. Department of Health and Services (HSS), all public health care …
Patient Resource to Evaluate Information
One of the best online resources for both patients and health care professionals is the …
Additional Strategies
According to a 2016 Gallup poll, nurses are once again seen as the most trusted and …
NURS 6051 Week 11 Assignment (Walden)
Description
Data/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom Continuum
ata/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom Continuum
As a registered nurse (RN), working in an intensive critical care unit (ICU) is seen as the zenith of clinical skills and knowledge. Every day, you are continuously faced with critical decisions
Clinical Question
Will obtaining the CCRN certificate lead to nurses in the ICU obtaining more critical care knowledge that can lead to wisdom in their role as a nurse?
Data and Information
The American Nurses Association (ANA) define data as “discrete entities that are described
CCRN Search
Knowledge on the CCRN
Transforming CCRN knowledge to Critical Care Wisdom
NURS 6051 Week 11 FINAL PAPER (Walden)
Description
A Patient Guide for Clostridium difficile
Walden University: Nursing 6051, Section 9
A Patient Guide for Clostridium difficile
Clostridium difficile has been found to be the main cause of gastrointestinal-related death …
Health Literacy Promotion Among Patients
The attached brochure was created for the sake of increasing health literacy and …
Conclusion
Since C. diff has the potential to kill or significantly disturb the health of patients, it is ...