+1 601-680-9567
ORDER NOW

NURS 6551 Week 9 Discussion – Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

NURS 6551 Week 9 Discussion – Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

NURS 6551 Week 9 Discussion – Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

To prepare Assignment 1: Application – Comprehensive Patient Assessment ON Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

Reflect on your Practicum Experience and select a female patient whom you have examined with the support and guidance of your Preceptor.

Think about the details of the patient’s background, medical history, physical exam, labs and diagnostics, diagnosis, treatment and management plan, as well as education strategies and follow-up care.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

To complete this NURS 6551 Week 9 Discussion – Abnormal Uterine Bleeding:

Write an 8- to 10-page comprehensive soap Note paper on Abnormal Uterine Bleeding , that addresses the following:

  • Age, race and ethnicity, and partner status of the patient
  • Current health status, including chief concern or complaint of the patient
  • Contraception method (if any)
  • Patient history, including medical history, family medical history, gynecologic history, obstetric history, and personal social history (as appropriate to current problem)
  • Review of systems
  • Physical exam
  • Labs, tests, and other diagnostics
  • Differential diagnoses
  • Management plan, including diagnosis, treatment, patient education, and follow-up care.

PLEASE FOLLOW ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA AND SAMPLE PAPER ATTACHED WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT. 100% ORINALITY AND APA FORMATE IS REQUIRED. DO NOT COPY SAMPLE PAPER , JUST FOLLOW THE PATTERN. NURS 6551 Week 9 Discussion – Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.

References

Schuiling, K. D., & Likis, F. E. (2013). Women’s gynecologic health (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

    • Chapter 5, “Gynecologic Anatomy and Physiology” (pp. 81–101)
    • Chapter 6, “Gynecologic History and Physical Examination” (pp. 103–131)

Tharpe, N. L., Farley, C., & Jordan, R. G. (2013). Clinical practice guidelines for midwifery & Women’s health (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

    • Chapter 6, “Care of the Well Woman Across the Life Span
    • “Preventive Health Care for Well Women” (pp. 263–265)
    • . Retrieved from http://www.womenshealth.gov/screening-tests-and-vaccines/screening-tests-for-women/Screening tests and vaccinesU.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2012b). Care of the Well Woman: Health Assessment and Screening” (pp. 265–270)
    • Society for Reporoductive Endocrinology and Infertility. (2012). Abnormal uterine bleeding. Retrieved from http://www.socrei.org/BOOKLET_abnormal_uteine_bleeding/Taran, F. A., Stewart, E. A., & Brucker, S. (2013). Adenomyosis: Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical phenotype and surgical and interventional alternative to hysterectomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkunde, 73(9), 924-931.

NURS 6551 Week 9 Practicum Experience Journal

Practicum –Journal Entry Week 9

Introduction

For this journal entry, I will reflect on a patient who presented with postpartum depression during my Practicum Experience. I will describe the patient’s personal and medical history, drug therapy and treatments, and follow-up care. Then, I will explain the implications of the patient’s postpartum depression, including how this might impact the entire family unit.

Course Rubric

Grid View List View Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement   Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.           Points:
Points Range:    44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

Responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth  supported by at least 3 credible references
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis  somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

post is cited with  fewer than 2 credible references
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

contains only 1 or no credible references
   Feedback:     Main Posting:
Writing           Points:
Points Range:    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

Written clearly and concisely

May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
   Feedback:           Points:
Points Range:    4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)