NURS 6052 Week 5 Evidence-Based Project Part 3
NURS 6052 Week 5 Evidence-Based Project Part 3
Week 5 Assignment
Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?
In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR NURS 6052 Week 5
Evidence-Based Project Part 3 ASSIGNMENT
To Prepare for NURS 6052 Week 5 Evidence-Based Project Part 3:
Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest for the Assignment.
Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question.
Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.
NURS 6052 Week 5 Reply (Walden)
Description
RESPONSE 1 WEEK 5
Good day,
Thank you for discussing such an interesting topic. This nurse is also a Marine veteran, and have seen firsthand the damage PTSD can cause. It is a shame the studies you mentioned did not …
RESPONSE 2 WEEK 5 posted fri
Good day,
Thank you for your interesting post. As a veteran, this nurse has a big interest in the topics you have chosen. It is too bad your first study had such a small sample size, it would have …
NURS 6052 Week 6 Discussion (Walden)
Description
Effectiveness of an Aspiration Risk-Reduction Protocol
This discussion will be a review on the validity of the article written by Metheny, Davis-Jackson, and Stewart and ways to strengthen it.
Statistical Conclusion Validity
Internal Validity
Construct Validity
External Validity
Changes Suggested
Not Considering Validity
NURS 6052 Week 6 Assignment (Walden)
Description
Critique Template for a Qualitative Study
NURS 5052/NURS 6052
Week 6 Assignment: Application: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies (due by Day 7 of Week 7)
What is a critique? Simply stated, a critique is a critical analysis undertaken for some purpose. Nurses critique research for three main reasons: to improve their practice, to broaden their understanding, and to provide a base for the conduct of a study.
When the purpose is to improve practice, nurses must give special consideration to questions such as these:
To help you synthesize your learning throughout this course and prepare you to utilize research in your practice, you will be critiquing a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods research study of your choice.
If the article is unavailable in a full-text version through the Walden University Library, you must e-mail the article as a PDF or Word attachment to your Instructor.
NURS 6052 Week 6 Reply (Walden)
Description
RESPONSE 1 WEEK 6
Good day,
Thank you for your contribution to this week’s discussion. This nurse completely agrees with you when you stated that validity is essential to research studies. While investigating validity, …
NURS 6052 Week 7 Assignment (Walden)
Description
Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
Walden University
Essentials of Evidenced-Based Practice
NURS 6052-
Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
This paper will focus on comparing the advantages and disadvantages of two different research methods. Specifically, the quantitative study will be a 2014 article by Nielsen et al. titled
Quantitative Research
Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research as Real Science
NURS 6052 Week 7 Response (Walden)
Description
RESPONSE 1 WEEK 7
Good day,
Thank you for your contribution to this week’s discussion. Before this week’s discussion, this nurse automatically considered quantitative studies as superior to qualitative ones. So when …
RESPONSE 2 WEEK 7
Good day,
Thank you for your contribution to our discussion. You bring up a very sensitive issue, and that is children in research. This nurse has a soft spot when it comes to kids. …
NURS 6052 Week 8 Discussion (Walden)
Description
Satisfaction Survey
This paper will discuss the implementation of a quantitative satisfaction survey on a hospital that averages 10,000 patients per year. This survey will utilize convenience sampling of
Survey:
Thank you for allowing us the privilege of assisting you with your healthcare needs. Your opinion is important to us, and we want to know how you felt about your recent visit to our …
NURS 6052 Week 8 Response (Walden)
Description
6052W8Resp
RESPONSE 1 WEEK 8
Good day,
Thank you for your contribution to our week’s discussion. Your combination of closed-ended and open-ended question is a great way to broaden the type of data obtained. Closed-ended …
RESPONSE 2 WEEK 8
Good day,
Thank you for your contribution to this week’s discussion. Your comments on incentives to increase survey response were intriguing. This nurse decided to do some research on the value of …
NURS 6052 Week 9 Discussion (Walden)
Description
Qualitative Article
This discussion will be based on the 2015 article by Iccha Basnyat Structural Violence in Health Care. The author of this article defines structural violence as societal limitations to access
Appropriateness of Design
Polit and Beck defined thematic narrative analysis as the researcher keeping each participant’s story as whole without fragmenting it (2017). Basnyat specifically addressed following that …
Utilizing a Qualitative Design for the Same Study
As Dr. Mauk stated in this week’s media presentation, qualitative research offers a “richness” in data that is not easily obtained through quantification. This study found themes on how sex …
NURS 6052 Week 9 Reply (Walden)
Description
RESPONSE 1 WEEK 9
Good day
Thank you for your interesting summary of qualitative data analysis. Since it was something we had already been taught this semester, did you feel it adequately summaries what we learned on
RESPONSE 2 WEEK 9
Good day,
Thank you for your contribution to this week’s discussion. In reading your summary on multivariate statistics, I was reminded of some tests that were discussed in chapter 17 on …
NURS 6052 Week 10 Project (Walden)
Description
Course Project on Drawing Seral Troponins
Walden University
Essentials of Evidenced-Based Practice
NURS 6052
Identification of Research Problem
Summary of Area of Interest
According to the American Heart Association (AHA), heart disease kills over 350,000 people in the United States per year, is the number one cause of death, and effects one person
Identification of Problem
The AHA 2014 guidelines recommend troponin to be drawn when patients first present
Significance for Nursing Practice
According to the American Nurses Association (ANA) 2014 Code of Ethics, nurses have
5 Questions
Question 1: What are the current orders each doctor typically orders on MI patients?
Question 2: What is each physician’s rationale for said orders?
Question 3: What barriers exist for doctors to implement EBP?
Question 4: Why are there no protocols in place in the hospital to follow AHA guidelines?
Question 5: How can protocols that adhere to AHA guidelines be implemented in the hospital?
Feasibility of 5 Questions
PICOT Question
PICOT: Will MI patients admitted to ICU who have serial troponins drawn as per AHA
Literature Review: Finding and Critiquing Evidence
Search terms selected: Troponin, cardiac, markers, myocardial infarction (MI), critical care, diagnosis, serial, acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Summary of Evidence.
KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
NURS 6052 Week 10 Reply (Walden)
Description
6052W10Reply
Good day,
Thank you for your contribution to our week’s discussion. I found your article discussion very interesting. Particularly your very insightful alternative explanation of the many reasons …
Good day,
I found your discussion on the treatment of schizoaffective disorder in the emergency room (ER) very interesting. As an ICU nurse, I am not familiar with that medication. …
NURS 6052 Week 11 Reply (Walden)
Description
RESPONSE 1 WEEK 11
Good day,
Thank you for your interesting contribution to our discussion. I have to agree with Dr. Buck’s point in that even though the newsletters may be convenient and cost-effective, it …
RESPONSE 2 WEEK 11
Good day,
Thank you for your interesting contribution to this week’s discussion. I found it ...