| Category |
% Value |
Less Than Satisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Excellent |
Instructor Comments |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
|
15 |
0 – 9 Points
Eight or more research articles do not meet the criteria for being peer reviewed or from nursing journals. A number of relevant research articles are insufficient for this project. Less than eight articles are submitted overall.
Web links are missing or are insufficient to accurately validate content.
Major changes are needed.
|
10 – 13 Points
Eight or more research articles meet the majority of the requirements for the assignment.
Web links are present, but not all are sufficient to validate content.
Moderate changes are needed.
|
14 – 15 Points
Eight or more research articles are clearly identified and meet the assignment criteria.
All Web links are present and sufficient for content validation.
No changes or minor changes are needed. |
Points______________
|
| Article Title and Year Published
|
10 |
0 – 6 Points
Eight or more research articles do not have accurate titles.
Most publications are more than 5 years old (minus seminal research). |
7 – 8 Points
Eight or more research articles meet the majority of the requirements for the assignment. More recent publications are needed on only some articles or topics.
Moderate changes are needed.
|
9 – 10 Points
Eight or more research articles are clearly identified and meet all assignment criteria.
No changes or minor changes are needed.
|
Points________________
|
| Article Interpretation Quality |
|
Less Than Satisfactory
|
Satisfactory
|
Excellent
|
Instructor Comments |
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/ Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study
|
5 |
1 – 3 Points
Research questions/ hypothesis are/is not clearly or accurately identified. Key information is missing in each category. HLT 364 Emerging Issues Within Healthcare Literature Review Template
Student does not identify purpose of study in any of the articles.
Major changes are needed. |
4 Points
Most research questions/ hypothesis are/is identified, and have key information presented in all articles, but with discrepancies.
Student identifies purpose only in some studies, or misidentifies purpose in some studies.
Moderate changes are needed.
|
5 Points
Key information is accurately presented for this category.
No changes or minor changes are needed. |
Points________________
|
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
|
5 |
1 – 3 Points
Design identification (quantitative/qualitative) is missing in all or many of the articles.
The majority of the articles have been incorrectly identified.
Major changes needed. |
4 Points
Design is identified for all articles, but with consistent misidentification of design type, or with major discrepancies.
Moderate changes are needed.
|
5 Points
Design is accurately identified correctly for all articles.
No changes or minor changes are needed. |
Points______________
|
| Setting/Sample
|
5 |
1 – 3 Points
Key information is missing or misidentified in each category.
Major changes are needed. |
4 Points
Key information is presented, but with discrepancies.
Moderate changes are needed.
|
5 Points
All key information is accurately presented for each category.
No changes or minor changes are needed. |
Points______________
|
| Methods: Intervention/ Instruments
|
5 |
1 – 3 Points
Method information is missing for all or some articles.
Major changes are needed. |
4 Points
Method information is presented in all articles, but with inaccuracies.
Moderate changes are needed.
|
5 Points
Methods are accurately presented for each category.
No changes or minor changes are needed. |
Points______________
|
| Analysis
|
5 |
1 – 3 Points
Analysis is missing for all or some articles.
Major changes are needed. |
4 Points
Analysis is presented for all articles, but with discrepancies.
Moderate changes are needed.
|
5 Points
Analysis accurately presented for each article.
No changes or minor changes are needed. |
Points______________
|
| Key Findings
|
5
|
1 – 3 Points
Key information on findings is missing in all or some articles.
Major changes are needed. |
4 Points
Key findings are presented in all articles, but with missing information or discrepancies.
Moderate changes are needed. HLT 364 Emerging Issues Within Healthcare Literature Review Template
|
5 Points
Key findings are accurately presented for this category.
No changes or minor changes are needed. |
Points______________
|
| Recommendations
|
5 |
1 – 3 Points
Recommendations are missing on some or all articles.
Recommendations for all or many articles lack rationale, clarity, or accuracy.
Major changes are needed.
|
4 Points
Recommendations are presented in all articles, but some are lacking in rationale, clarity, or accuracy.
Moderate changes are needed.
|
5 Points
Recommendations are accurately presented for each category.
No changes or minor changes are needed. |
Points______________
|
| Supporting Rationale |
|
Less Than Satisfactory
|
Satisfactory
|
Excellent
|
Instructor Comments |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports Capstone
|
40 |
0 – 27 Points
Explanations are missing for all or some of the articles.
Explanations generally lack adequate support and rational for the Capstone Project.
Major changes are needed. |
28 – 36 Points
Explanations are provided for all articles, but explanations are superficial.
Explanations offer minimal support and rationale to support the Capstone Project.
Moderate changes are needed.
|
37 – 40 Points
Thorough, detailed explanation is provided for all articles.
Specific article content is referenced, showing support for the Capstone Project.
No changes or minor changes are needed.
|
Points______________
|
| Overall Comments
|
Total Points Awarded ______________ |