Capella University Patient Safety Enterprise Model Research Paper
Please conduct a Capella Library or Internet search to locate a best practice for establishing a systems-based culture of patient safety. You may explore both internal and external best practices for this topic. If you are affiliated with an organization that has been recognized for patient safety, please also include one or two important facets that distinguish your high-performing organization. For best practices, you may wish to peruse literature from national quality organizations or accrediting bodies and entities that issue awards in health care.
ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
In your initial post, describe the best practice you identified in your research. Initial posts should be based on peer-reviewed, evidence-based literature or include information from a nationally recognized accrediting body or quality organization. Anecdotal accounts of internal best practices should be accompanied by evidence from the organization’s Web site or other easily verifiable source. A minimum of two outside, peer-reviewed sources are required for this post; these sources do not include those in the courseroom. Include APA-formatted in-text citations and accompanying, congruent APA-formatted references.
Reference
Youngberg, B. J. (2011). Principles of risk management and patient safety. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
Respond to the posts of other learners according to the Faculty
Expectations Response Guidelines. If possible, respond to one learner
who has a perspective, background, or goals that are similar to yours,
and to one learner whose perspective, background, or goals are
different. Peer responses should be substantive and must include one
peer-reviewed source that aligns with the discussion thread. You may
feel free to add an additional source that is new or provides a
completely different perspective. “I agree” and “Thanks for sharing your
insights” are examples of responses that do not contribute content for
enhanced learning and are unacceptable. The goal is quality, substantive
feedback that demonstrates higher-order critical thinking and
evaluation of peers’ initial post