Capella University Duty to Warn Duty to Protect Privacy Versus Disclosure Case Study
Case Study: Privacy Versus Disclosure
Suppose you are supervising an employee who works in a substance abuse treatment facility. The employee reports that a client she is caring for has informed her that the client no longer wants to live and wants help to commit suicide.
The principle is that every client has the right to confidentiality and that the caregiver must respect this right. However, the client also has the free right to make her own decisions in accordance with the principle of self-determination. The employee wants to report the desire of the client to do harm to herself in order to save her life, but the principle of confidentiality conflicts with the right of self-determination.
ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Discuss your instructions to the employee on how best to resolve this dilemma. Analyze how these instructions will be effective.
Your initial post must:
- Be at least 250 words in length.
- Contain a minimum of two references with citations in APA style.
- Follow APA style guidelines.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
Respond to the post of at least two of your peers, discussing your analysis of self-determination that would be helpful in your future interactions with employees. Ask questions that will help you better understand each post and contribute to expanding the discussion. Make substantive suggestions that will provide food for thought.
LEARNING COMPONENTS
This activity will help you achieve the following learning components:
- Analyze an ethical dilemma regarding privacy versus disclosure.
- Propose appropriate supervisory instruction, analyzing how it would be effective.
- Communicate using original work with writing that is articulate and professional, using current APA formatting and style.
RESOURCESUSE YOUR BECOMING AN ETHICAL HELPING PROFESSIONAL TEXT (AVAILABLE IN THE CAPELLA LIBRARY) TO READ THE FOLLOWING:
- Chapter 6, “Confidentiality and Trust,” review pages 140–141.
- Chapter 12, “More Specialties: Families, Couples, Rehabilitation, Addictions, Pastoral Confidentiality,” pages 292–293.
- Chapter 13, “Teaching, Mentoring, Supervision,” pages 333–337.
Use the Internet to read the following:
- Granich, S. (n.d.). Duty to warn, duty to protect. The New Social Worker. Retrieved from http://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles/ethic…
- Findlaw. (n.d.). Tarasoff v. regents of University of California. Retrieved from http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-supreme-court/183044…
- Nesbitt, N. A. (2013). Tarasoff v. regents of the University of California: Psychotherapist’s obligation of confidentiality versus the duty to warn [PDF]. Tulsa Law Review, 12(4). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/cgi/viewcont…
- Texas Health and Human Services System. (2015, August). HHS ethics policy [PDF]. Retrieved from https://hhs.texas.gov/sites/default/files/document…
Use the Internet to review the following material from Unit 4:
- Gremmels, B. (n.d.). Ethics in social services: How to think about them and how to handle them | Transcript [Video]. Retrieved from
- Review this video regarding autonomy versus self-determination. This video covers client autonomy and the right to make bad decisions. Dr. Gremmels is the Director of Ethics at Saint Thomas Health in Nashville.