St Thomas University Theory of the Nurse as Wounded Healer Presentation

Goal:

Identify the tenets and application of a nursing theory. Discuss the impact of the identified nursing theory on evidence-based practice.

Your presentation should include the following:

– Identify the nurse theory selected.
– Provide an overview of the concepts of the nursing theory.
– Analyze the application of the selected nursing theory for evidence-based practice.
– Provide recommendations for application of selected nursing theory

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

Submission Instructions:

Presentation is original work and logically organized in current APA style. Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
Power point presentation with 8 -10 slides, excluding the tile slide and the reference slide.
The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.

null

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

Presentation Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Points
Identification of Main Issues/Problems	4 points Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.	3 points Excellent Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.	2 points Fair Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.	1 point Poor Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.	4 points
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems	4 points Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.	3 points Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.	2 points Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.	1 point Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.	4 points
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding	4 points Distinguished Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.	3 points Excellent Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.	2 points Fair Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.	1 point Poor Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.	4 points
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature	4 points Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.	3 points Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.	2 points Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.	1 point Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.	4 points
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines Includes Speaker’s Notes and the assigned Number of Slides	4 points Distinguished Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.	3 points Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.	2 points Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.	1 point Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.	4 points
Total Points: 20

Presentation Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Points

Identification of Main Issues/Problems

4 points
Distinguished

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

3 points
Excellent

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

2 points
Fair

Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

1 point
Poor

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

4 points

Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems

4 points
Distinguished

Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

3 points
Excellent

Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

2 points
Fair

Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

1 point
Poor

Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

4 points

Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

4 points
Distinguished

Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

3 points
Excellent

Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

2 points
Fair

Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

1 point
Poor

Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

4 points

Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

4 points
Distinguished

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

3 points
Excellent

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

2 points
Fair

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

1 point
Poor

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

4 points

Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

Includes Speaker’s Notes and the assigned Number of Slides

4 points
Distinguished

Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

3 points
Excellent

Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

2 points
Fair

Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

1 point
Poor

Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

4 points

Total Points: 20

Rubric

Presentation Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues/Problems

4 ptsDistinguished

Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

3 ptsExcellent

Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

2 ptsFair

Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

1 ptsPoor

Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms

4 ptsDistinguished

Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

3 ptsExcellent

Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

2 ptsFair

Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

1 ptsPoor

Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

4 ptsDistinguished

Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

3 ptsExcellent

Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

2 ptsFair

Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

1 ptsPoor

Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

4 ptsDistinguished

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

3 ptsExcellent

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

2 ptsFair

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

1 ptsPoor

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting GuidelinesIncludes speaker’s notes and the assigned number of slides.

4 ptsFull Marks

Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

3 ptsExcellent

Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

2 ptsFair

Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

1 ptsPoor

Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.

1 attachments

Slide 1 of 1

attachment_1

attachment_1

UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW

Theory of the Nurse as Wounded Healer Team Presentation The Nursing theory and Theoretician  Marion Conti-O’Hare psychiatric and mental health Advanced Practice Registered Nurses  Theory of the Nurse as Wounded Healer based on personal experience and expertise (Conti-O’Hare, 2002).  Nursing has a cause-and-effect relationship with wounds Background of the Theory  Curing is relief from illness while healing is becoming whole again  Curing has roots in cura meaning relief (Conti-O’Hare, 2002).  Healing has roots in hal meaning to make whole  Wounds propel nurses to practice, healing increases effectiveness Concepts of the Theory  Transcendence is the precursor to Healing  Transcending involves rising above the pain and hurt as a snake sheds its skin (Conti-O’Hare, 2002)  Healing augments effectiveness as a nurse (Ratrout