10 Strategic Points Quantitative Study Extraction #2

View Rubric

Max Points: 50

Details:

In the prospectus, proposal, and dissertation there are 10 strategic points that need to be clear, simple, correct, and aligned to ensure the research is doable, valuable, and credible. These points, which provide a guide or vision for the research, are present in almost any research study. The ability to identify these points is one of the first skills required in the creation of a viable doctoral dissertation. In this assignment, you will identify and evaluate 10 strategic points in a published quantitative research study.

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

Review the Wigton dissertation.
Locate and download “Modified 10 Points Template.”
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
APA style is not required for this assignment.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Directions:

Using the “Modified 10 Points Template,” identify each of the 10 strategic points in this quantitative dissertation.

Complete the “Evaluation” section of the template by addressing the following questions (250-500 words) with regard to the 10 strategic points in the study:

Discuss the key points in the literature review and how the author used this section to identify the gap or problem addressed in the study.
Describe the variables under study and how they are a key component in this quantitative research study. You are not expected to understand the differences between variables at this point, but should be able to identify how they inform the problem, purpose, research questions and data collection instruments.
Describe the problem and how it informed the research questions under study.
Describe the quantitative design used and why it is appropriate for the identified problem and research questions. Support your response with a peer-reviewed citation from a research source.
Assess the appropriateness of the instruments used to collect data and answer the research questions as well as to address the stated problem.
Discuss how the problem statement informed the development of the purpose statement in this study.

RES-825-RS-Modified10PointsTemplate.docx RES-825-RS-WigtonQuantDissertation.pdf

1RES-825-RS-Modified10PointsTemplate-7.docx

College of Doctoral Studies

RES-850 Modified 10 Strategic Points Template

Article Citation

Point	Description	Location (Page #)
Broad Topic Area
Lit Review
Problem Statement
Research Questions
Sample
Describe Phenomena (qualitative) or Define Variables/ Hypotheses (quantitative)
Methodology & Design
Purpose Statement
Data Collection Approach
Data Analysis Approach
Evaluation (Maximum 250-500 words)

RES-825-RS-WigtonQuantDissertation-3.pdf

Evaluating 19-Channel Z-score Neurofeedback:

Addressing Efficacy in a Clinical Setting

Submitted by

Nancy L. Wigton

A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Degree

Doctorate of Philosophy

Grand Canyon University

Phoenix, Arizona

May 15, 2014

All rights reserved

INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.

In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,

a note will indicate the deletion.

Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against

unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code

ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway

P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 – 1346

UMI 3625170 Published by ProQuest LLC (2014). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.

UMI Number: 3625170

© by Nancy L. Wigton, 2014

All rights reserved.

Abstract

Neurofeedback (NF) is gaining recognition as an evidence-based intervention grounded

in learning theory, and 19-channel z-score neurofeedback (19ZNF) is a new NF model.

Peer-reviewed literature is lacking regarding empirical-based evaluation of 19ZNF. The

purpose of this quantitative research study was to evaluate the efficacy of 19ZNF, in a

clinical setting, using archival data from a Southwest NF practice, with a retrospective

one-group pretest-posttest design. Each of the outcome measures framed a group such

that 19ZNF was evaluated, as it relates to the particular neuropsychological constructs of

attention (n = 10), behavior (n = 14), executive function (n = 12), as well as

electrocortical functioning (n = 21). The research questions asked if 19ZNF improves

these constructs. One-tailed t tests performed, compared pre-post scores for included

clinical assessment scales, and selected quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG)

metrics. For all pre-post comparisons, the direction of change was in the predicted

direction. Moreover, for all outcome measures, the group means were beyond the

clinically significant threshold before 19ZNF, and no longer clinically significant after

19ZNF. All differences were statistically significant, with results ranging from p = .000

to p = .008; and effect sizes ranging from 1.29 to 3.42. Results suggest 19ZNF improved

attention, behavior, executive function, and electrocortical function. This study provides

beginning evidence of 19ZNF’s efficacy, adds to what is known about 19ZNF, and offers

an innovative approach for using QEEG metrics as outcome measures. These results may

lead to a greater acceptance of 19ZNF, as well as foster needed additional scientific

research.

Keywords: Neurofeedback, QEEG, z-score neurofeedback, 19ZNF, EEG biofeedback

v

Dedication

This dissertation is dedicated to my Lord and Savior, Jesus. From my first

thoughts of considering a doctoral program being divinely inspired and directed, through

to the last step I will take across a graduation stage, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are

always the center point, the anchor. To that end, three Bible passages capture the

experience of my journey.

The way of God is perfect, the Lord’s word has stood the test; He is the shield of

all who take refuge in Him. What god is there but the Lord? What rock but our

God? – the God who girds me with strength and makes my way blameless, who

makes me swift as the deer and sets me secure on the mountains (Psalms 18:30-

33, New English Bible).

“Commit your life to the Lord; trust in Him and He will act. He will make your

righteousness shine clear as the day and the justice of your cause like the sun at noon”

(Psalms 37:5-6).

“Not to us, O Lord, not to us, but to thy name ascribe the glory, for thy true love

and for thy constancy” (Psalms 115:1).

vi

Acknowledgments

It is only through the Lord’s strength and wisdom that this dissertation came to

fruition. Next, I acknowledge the man with whom the Lord has made me one, my

husband. You are truly the wind beneath my wings, and without you I would not have

had the wherewithal to complete this endeavor. Thank you for all your support and

sharing your perseverance for my good. I also wish to acknowledge, with unbounded

gratitude, the most perfect dissertation committee possible for this journey.

To my chair, Dr. Genomary Krigbaum, words are insufficient to fully express the

depth and breadth of my appreciation for your support, guidance, and direction. When I

first read descriptions of what the ideal chair would be, with characteristics inclusive of

mentor, advocate, role model, teacher, defender, guide, supervisor, coach, encourager,

and friend, I wondered if it would ever be possible to find all those elements in one

person. Yet in you, I found them all, and more. Por siempre agradecida. Moreover, thank

you for encouraging me to build on the methodology you started. To Dr. Daniel Smith, I

am grateful that you joined my dissertation team. I knew I could count on you for your

statistical expertise, and you did not disappoint. Thank you for the many conversations

prior to my dissertation journey, and in helping to pave the way for the best committee

possible. To Dr. Genie Bodenhamer-Davis, as a most respected neurofeedback

practitioner and educator, I am humbled and honored that you were willing to assist me in

my dissertation journey. Thank you, so much, for your counsel over the last 3 years. To

Dr. Ron Bonnstetter, thank you for your support in being my adjunct dissertation reader.

Thank you for your compliments on my writing and your assurance I have what it takes

to succeed as a scholar. 10 Strategic Points Quantitative Study Extraction #2