Literature Review PSY699 Assignment

Important information the literary view is on the the article “Mechanism of disease, Major Depressive Disorder” (Belmaker, 2008). Which is attached. The four domains are COGNITIVE, BIOLOGICAL, SOCIAL/PERSONALITY AND DEVELOPMENT, The thesis I turn in is also attached. This paper can not any plagiarizing

Week 6 – Final Assignment

Integrative Literature Review

The primary goal of this literature review is to integrate concepts from four different content domains within the larger field of psychology. The four content domains should be chosen from previous coursework in this program. In this paper, students will review the findings in the individual empirical articles, organize the research in a meaningful way, evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the research findings, and present an integrated synthesis of the research that sheds new light on the topics within and across the four domains.

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

The result of a successful integrative literature review may be a significant contribution to a particular body of knowledge and, consequently, to research and practice. Therefore, before writing this literature review, substantive new research must be conducted via the Internet and within the Ashford University Library for each of the four chosen domains. A minimum of six sources must be included for each of the four domains. Although content from literature reviews completed in prior courses within this program may be included, it may not constitute the total research for the individual domains addressed within this assignment. No more than four sources from previous literature reviews completed in this program may be utilized for this integrative review.

The headings listed below must be used within the paper to delineate the sections of content. These sections include the following: a clear introduction that provides a general review and organizes the research in a meaningful way; a discussion in which the evidence is presented through analysis, critique, and synthesis; and a conclusion in which the discussion is drawn together in a meaningful way, the claims of the introduction are brought to a logical closure, and new research is proposed. Literature Review PSY699 Assignment

Introduction

· Provide a conceptual framework for the review.

· Describe how the review will be organized. The questions below may be used to guide this section.

o What are the guiding theories within the domains?

o How are the domains connected?

o Are there competing points of view across the domains?

o Why is the integration of these domains important?

o What is the history of these domains?

o What are the related theories or findings?

· Describe how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized.

· How and why was the literature chosen?

· What is your claim or thesis statement?

Discussion

· Provide the analysis, critique, and synthesis for the review.

Analysis

· Examine the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the four domains.

· Integrate concepts from the four different content domains within the larger field of psychology.

· What claim(s) can be made in the introduction?

· What evidence supports the claim(s) made in the introduction?

Critique

· Evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings.

· How well does the literature represent the issues across the four domains?

· Identify the strengths and the key contributions of the literature.

· What, if any, deficiencies exist within the literature?

· Have the authors omitted any key points and/or arguments?

· What, if any, inaccuracies have been identified in the literature?

· What evidence runs contrary to the claims proposed in the introduction, and how might these be reconciled with the claims presented?

· Explain how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings.

· Did the ethical issues influence the outcomes of the research?

· Were ethical considerations different across the domains?

Synthesis

· Integrate existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives.

· Describe the research that has previously been done across these domains, as well as any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist.

· Relate the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made.

· Construct clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains.

Conclusion

· Provide a conclusion and present potential future considerations.

· State your final conclusion(s).

· Synthesize the findings described in the discussion into a succinct summary.

· What questions remain?

· What are the possible implications of your argument for existing theories and for everyday life?

· Are there novel theories and/or testable hypothesizes for future research?

· What do the overarching implications of the studies show?

· Where should the research go from this point to further the understanding of these domains and the greater study of psychology?

Attention Students: The Masters of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Pathbrite portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this Integrative Literature Review, please implement any changes recommended by the instructor, go to Pathbrite (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and upload the revised Integrative Literature Review to the portfolio. (Use the Pathbrite Quick-Start Guide (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. to create an account if you do not already have one.) The upload of signature assignments will take place after completing each course. Be certain to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual students as a professional resource tool. See the Pathbrite (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. website for information and further instructions on using this portfolio tool. Literature Review PSY699 Assignment

The Integrative Literature Review

· Must be 20 to 30 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

· Must include a separate title page with the following:

o Title of paper

o Student’s name

o Course name and number

o Instructor’s name

o Date submitted

· Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.

· Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.

· Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.

· Must use at least 24 peer-reviewed sources, including a minimum of 20 from the Ashford University Library.

· Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

· Must include a separate reference list that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

newenglandmajordepression.pdf
Thesismajordepressiondisorder.docx

DISORDER 1

DISORDER 2

Major Depressive Disorder

Mary Garcia

Psy 699 Master of Arts in Psychology Capstone

Dr. Wayne Briner

November 12, 2018

This Literary review the article “Mechanism of disease, Major Depressive Disorder” (Belmaker, 2008). The major depressive disorder is actually a condition concerning debilitation in individuals suffering from reduced interests, vegetative symptoms, impaired cognitive functions, and depressed mood. The risk of developing major depressive is actually linked with environmental factors such as emotional, sexual, and abuse that is physical during childhood. It brings about the continual loss of sadness and interest in a person (Rock et al., 2014). It causes the persistent loss of interest and sadness in a person (Rock et al., 2014). The symptoms of the major depressive disorder include feelings of hopelessness, worthlessness, tearfulness, emptiness or sadness, loss of pleasure in tasks that are regular , weight loss, slowed thinking patterns, and physical issues like persistent pain. Women are definitely more ] towards suffering from this disorder as males have fewer odds of suffering from that disorder. The major depressive disorder affects behavior, development, social life, and the cognition perhaps after getting rid of the disorder. Literature Review PSY699 Assignment

Disorders always affect negatively even if the person is in remission. Cognition is definitely the very first things the individual will be affected rapidly and for a lengthy time. One review comprised of five hundred individuals that revealed impaired cognitive performance in nine of the eleven integrated studies. In Addison the review assessed the connection between clinical features and cognitive function like current medication status and residual depressive symptoms. On the other hand, the negative aspect of this particular review relates to the extensive amount of different cognitive tests used throughout the studies and lack of setup of standard effects sizes to mirror the amount of impairment (Hasselbalch et al., 2011).

Social life is concerned the second most crucial factor which provides the individual a healthy mood. The more the individual’s social life become disruptive the more the personality leans towards negativity. Major depressive disorders lower the social performance and this argument is supported by the Weightman et al (2014). They generated thirty-one studies for their review after searching from an electronic database to identify clinical studies highlighting social performance in a major depressive disorder population. Their review discovered that severity of depression appears to be inversely linked with social performance. At the same time as the bias toward negative thoughts remains while in remission They concluded that in major depressive, the difficulties with social interactions are observed due to a distorted ability to accurately interpret mental states and emotional stimuli.

Major depressive disorder plays a significant role in hindering the overall development this includes the quality of life. However, if the proper treatment is received, there is a good chance of recovering from this disorder. In addition, an individual will gain a better quality of life. A study by IsHak et al (2015) revealed the impact of the major depressive disorder before and after treatment. Their results show that no more than 3% of patients of major depressive disorder experienced a normal quality of life but in following treatments, statistically noteworthy improvements were noticed; though with more than 50% patients experiencing severely impaired quality of life while patients after remission had greater improvements as compared to the patients who did not get remitted. Literature Review PSY699 Assignment

The review of the literature states that major depressive disorder affects the major areas of life including cognition, development (quality of life), and social performance. It largely lowers the brain functioning and hits the different parts of the brain. Patients even after getting remission sometimes or on a large extent do not improve, and impairment in cognitive, psychological and behavioral abilities remains the same.

References

Belmaker, R. (2008). Mechanisms of Disease, Major Depressive Disorder. The New Enyland Journal of Medicine, 55-68. Hasselbalch BJ, Knorr U, Kessing LV (2011). Cognitive impairment in the remitted state of unipolar depressive disorder: a systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders 134, 20–31. IsHak, W. W., Mirocha, J., James, D., Tobia, G., Vilhauer, J., Fakhry, H., … & Cohen, R. M. (2015). Quality of life in major depressive disorder before/after multiple steps of treatment and one‐year follow‐up. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 131(1), 51-60. Rock, P. L., Roiser, J. P., Riedel, W. J., & Blackwell, A. D. (2014). Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological medicine, 44(10), 2029-2040. Weightman, M. J., Air, T. M., & Baune, B. T. (2014). A review of the role of social cognition in major depressive disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 179.
tubic.docx

Describes How the Review Will be Organized

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Thoroughly describes how the review will be organized.

Proficient – Describes how the review will be organized. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic – Minimally describes how the review will be organized. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how the review will be organized; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The description of Describes how the review will be organized is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Describes How the Literature Was Identified, Analyzed, and Synthesized

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Thoroughly describes how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized.

Proficient – Describes how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic – Partially describes how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized; however, significant details and unclear.

Non-Performance – The description of how the literature was identified, analyzed, and synthesized is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Examines the Main Ideas and Relationships Presented In the Literature Across the Four Domains

Total: 2.25

Distinguished – Thoroughly examines the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the four domains.

Proficient – Examines the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the four domains. Minor details are missing.

Basic – Minimally examines the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the four domains. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations – Attempts to examine the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the domains; however, all four domains are not addressed, or significant details are missing.

Non-Performance – The examination of the main ideas and relationships presented in the literature across the four domains is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Integrates Concepts From the Four Different Content Domains Within the Larger Field of Psychology

Total: 2.50

Distinguished – Fully and clearly integrates concepts from the four different content domains within the larger field of psychology.

Proficient – Integrates concepts from the four different content domains within the larger field of psychology. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic – Minimally integrates concepts from the four different content domains within the larger field of psychology. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to integrate concepts from the different content domains within the larger field of psychology; however, all four content domains are not addressed, or significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The integration of concepts from the four different content domains within the larger field of psychology is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Evaluates the Reliability, Validity, and Generalizability of the Chosen Research Findings

Total: 2.50

Distinguished – Thoroughly evaluates the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings.

Proficient – Evaluates the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings. Minor details are missing.

Basic – Partially evaluates the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to evaluate the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The evaluation of the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the chosen research findings is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Explains How the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct Might Influence the Reliability and/or Generalizability of the Chosen Findings

Total: 2.50

Distinguished – Explains how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings.

Proficient – Explains how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings.

Basic – Explains how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings. Literature Review PSY699 Assignment

Below Expectations – Explains how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings.

Non-Performance – The explanation of how the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct might influence the reliability and/or generalizability of the chosen findings is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Integrates Existing Ideas with New Ideas to Create New Knowledge and New Perspectives

Total: 2.50

Distinguished – Fully and clearly integrates existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives.

Proficient – Integrates existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic – Minimally integrates existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to integrate existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The integration of existing ideas with new ideas to create new knowledge and new perspectives is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Describes the Research That Has Previously Been Done Across the Chosen Domains

Total: 2.25

Distinguished – Thoroughly describes the research that has previously been done across the chosen domains.

Proficient – Describes the research that has previously been done across the chosen domains. Minor details are missing.

Basic – Partially describes the research that has previously been done across the chosen domains. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe the research that has previously been done across the chosen domains; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance – The description of the research that has previously been done across the chosen domains is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Describes Any Controversies Or Alternate Opinions That Currently Exist

Total: 2.25

Distinguished – Thoroughly describes any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist.

Proficient – Describes any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist. Minor details are missing.

Basic – Partially describes any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance – The description of any controversies or alternate opinions that currently exist is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Literature Review PSY699 Assignment

Relates the Evidence Presented to the Major Conclusions Being Made in the Critique

Total: 2.25

Distinguished – Clearly and thoroughly relates the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made in the critique.

Proficient – Relates the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made in the critique. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic – Minimally relates the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made in the critique. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to relate the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made in the critique; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The relation of the evidence presented to the major conclusions being made in the critique is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Constructs Clear and Concise Arguments Using Evidence-Based Psychological Concepts and Theories to Posit New Relationships and Perspectives on the Topics Within the Domains

Total: 2.50

Distinguished – Constructs thorough, clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains.

Proficient – Constructs arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic – Constructs limited arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to construct arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The construction of clear and concise arguments using evidence-based psychological concepts and theories to posit new relationships and perspectives on the topics within the domains is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Synthesizes the Findings Described in the Discussion into a Succinct Summary

Total: 2.50

Distinguished – Clearly and thoroughly synthesizes the findings described in the discussion into a succinct summary.

Proficient – Synthesizes the findings described in the discussion into a succinct summary. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic – Minimally synthesizes the findings described in the discussion into a summary. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to synthesize the findings described in the discussion into a succinct summary; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The synthesis of the findings described in the discussion into a succinct summary is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Literature Review PSY699 Assignment

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. Literature Review PSY699 Assignment

Powered by