Final Project II: Bioethics Paper

This week, you will submit your polished, final version of Final Project II: Bioethics. Before you submit, make sure you have incorporated all the suggestions you received from your instructor for Milestone Three.

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

To complete this assignment, review the Final Project guidelines.

Feed Back from previous assignment that needs to be included in to paper that was missing is:

1)The bioethics are listed on page 22 in the textbook. You need to include one or more of the four principles listed on that page (ie: autonomy, beneficence, nonmalfecience, justice, etc.)

2) You did a good job in the conclusion, but you need to provide the analyze with one or more of the principles.

The paper that needs to be revised is attached below with the rubric and the Bioethics Case.

FinalProjectMilestoneThree-DraftofFinalProjectII-Bioethics.docx

Terry Schiavo Bioethical Case 1

Terry Schiavo Bioethical Case 3

Terry Schiavo Bioethical Case

Introduction

The Terri Schiavo case was a crosswise case that started a great deal of contention about the end of life choices and touched off a fight between two groups of one family and the Florida state and went similar to the US Congress. From multiple points of view, this case has affected the healthcare industry. Terri Schiavo’s case was a 15year long legitimate case from 1990 when she endured huge cerebrum damage which left her in a persistent vegetative state to 2005 when she passed. It was a case that was deciding her entitlement to end life. On February 25, 1990, Terri Schiavo endured a heart failure at her home in St. Petersburg, Florida, her better half called 911 who had the option to revive her effectively yet she had just endured immense cerebrum damage because of hypoxia to her brain and was left senseless with negligible mind stem work that controls her reflexes and capacity to breath. After it was resolved that nothing else should be possible for her situation, she was analyzed to be in a persistent vegetative state (PVS), which required life-supporting protocol including a feeding tube to enable her to proceed with the essential needs of nourishment. In the years following, Terri’s folks and spouse would ignite a crosswise discussion concerning end-of-life care which has right up ’til the present time left an enormous effect in the health care field. Final Project II: Bioethics Paper

Bioethical Analysis

According to Hussung (2017), therapeutic signs are resolved. After diagnosis of persistent vegetative status is affirmed, the expert nervous system specialists, talks about the probability of the patient recouping from the condition with the relatives. This incorporates the guardians, life partner, children, or kin. Significantly, the patient is given regard while experiencing treatment and care at home. It is along these lines of the moral ramifications that Terri Schiavo’s case demonstrates that she was not given the necessary regard since discussion to expel her feeding tube was high between her significant other and her folks concerning the assurance of care.

Then again, there are the victim relatives who kept on thinking about her as long as she is alive. Concluding to end one’s life is a very troublesome decision. This can be seen in this epic scene to terminate Terry’s life. One could contend with the meaning of PVS. Is the level at which an individual is portrayed as being in a PVS, similar for everybody?

Or on the other hand, are there various relevant dimensions? Additionally, for what reason would it be a good idea for it to be surrendered over to the courts to choose? In my opinion, nobody has the option to pick except for the family. The privilege to bite the dust is seriously close to home end-of-life choice. As indicated by Herring (2014),” Bioethics concerns for moral inquiries included in human comprehension of life. It is understood by the need of an experts reflection about ethical conflicts, which are brought about by progress in life science and prescription.”

Conclusion

Terri Schiavo’s deplorable story raises various troublesome issues. As dependable citizens, we have to think about these- – intentionally entering the open discussion – while keeping up a feeling of modesty and reasonable play in our discourses. We likewise need to consider our own medical services wish painstakingly and, while we are as yet capable, wisely pass on them. Final Project II: Bioethics Paper

References

Herring, J. (2014). Medical law and ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.

Hussung, T. (2017). Bioethical Issues in Health Care Management. Retrieved from: https://online.csp.edu/uncategorized/bioethical-issues-in-health-care-management

Perry, J. E., Churchill, L. R., & Kirshner, H. S. (2005). The Terri Schiavo case: legal, ethical, and medical perspectives. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(10), 744.
IHP420MilestoneThreeGuidelinesAndRubric.pdf

1

IHP 420 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric

Overview: Healthcare professionals provide support throughout the cycle of life, from birth to death. They have an obligation to provide humane and compassionate care to patients while adhering to their specific field’s code of ethics. Sometimes, healthcare professionals are privy to discussions between family members regarding end-of-life issues. In some instances, a healthcare facility may be in charge of providing information about advance directives to patients. Healthcare professionals should calibrate their own moral beliefs to align with their ethical and legal obligations. By studying issues contained within real-life cases, healthcare professionals can come to terms with their beliefs and obligations relative to end-of-life issues.

Prompt: In this project, you will analyze the Terri Schiavo case through the lens of the bioethical issue(s) related to the case. You will address what the bioethical issue is and what role end-of-life issues, such as self-determination and advanced directives, played in the case. Using your analysis, you will determine how this bioethical issue impacted the decisions made by the healthcare professionals involved in the case.

Specifically, your essay must address the following critical elements:

I. Introduction: Describe the provided case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the bioethical issue, and the time period of the incident

that occurred. II. Bioethical Analysis: Analyze the bioethical issue for the role end-of-life issues played in the case. Be sure to use appropriate terminology and support

with secondary research. III. Conclusion: Describe how the bioethical issue influenced the decisions of healthcare professionals involved in the case. Be sure to use specific examples.

Rubric

Guidelines for Submission: Your bioethical short paper should be 1–2 pages in Microsoft Word with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. All citations and references should be formatted according to the most recent APA guidelines.

2

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Introduction Describes the provided case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the bioethical issue, and the time period of the incident that occurred

Describe the provided case, but description is cursory or illogical, contains inaccuracies, or does not include information on the stakeholders, bioethical issue, or time period of the incident

Does not describe the provided case 31.15

Bioethical Analysis Analyzes the bioethical issue for the role end-of-life issues played in the case, utilizing appropriate terminology and supporting with secondary research

Analyzes the bioethical issue for the role end-of-life issues played in the case, but analysis is cursory or illogical, contains inaccuracies, does not use appropriate terminology, or is not supported with secondary research

Does not analyze the bioethical issue for the role end-of-life issues played in the case

31.15

Conclusion Describes how the bioethical issue impacted the decisions of healthcare professionals involved in the case, and uses specific examples

Describes how the bioethical issue impacted the decisions of the healthcare professionals in the case, but description is cursory or illogical, contains inaccuracies, or is not supported by specific examples

Does not describe how the bioethical issue impacted the decisions of healthcare professionals involved in the case

31.15

Articulation of Response

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

6.55

Total 100%
TERRISCHIAVOCASE.pdf
BOOKCOVER.pdf