Discussion Assignment Question Paper
Discussion Assignment Question Paper
Discussion Question
Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment
To Prepare
· Review the Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on comprehensive, integrated psychiatric assessment. Watch the Mental Status Examination B-6 and Simulation Scenario-Adolescent Risk Assessment videos. Discussion Assignment Question Paper
· Watch the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video and take notes; you will use this video as the basis for your Discussion post.
ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
By Day 3 of Week 1
Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions:
· What did the practitioner do well? In what areas can the practitioner improve?
· At this point in the clinical interview, do you have any compelling concerns? If so, what are they?
· What would be your next question, and why?
Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts do not have to be tailored to the patient in the YMH Boston video.
· Explain why a thorough psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent is important.
· Describe two different symptom rating scales that would be appropriate to use during the psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent.
· Describe two psychiatric treatment options for children and adolescents that may not be used when treating adults.
· Explain the role parents/guardians play in assessment.
Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources. Discussion Assignment Question Paper
Discussion Question
Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment
To Prepare
Review the Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on comprehensive,
integrated psychiatric assessment. Watch the
Mental Status Examination
B 6 and Simulation
Scenario
–
Adolescent Risk Assessment videos.
Watch the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video and take notes; you will use this video as the basis for
your Discussion post.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions:
·What did the practitioner do well? In what areas can the practitioner improve?
·
At this point in the clinical interview, do you have any compelling concerns? If so, what are they?
·
What would be your next question, and why?
Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts do not have to be tailored to the patient in
the YMH Boston video.
·
Explain why a thorough psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent is important.
·
Describe two different symptom rating scales that would be appropriate to use during the
psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent.
·
Describe two psychiatric treatment options for children and adolescents that may not be used
when treating adults.
·
Explain the role parents/guardians play in assessment.
Support your response with at least three peer reviewed, evidence based sources and explain why each
of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources. Discussion Assignment Question Paper
Discussion Question
Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment
To Prepare
Review the Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on comprehensive,
integrated psychiatric assessment. Watch the Mental Status Examination B-6 and Simulation
Scenario-Adolescent Risk Assessment videos.
Watch the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video and take notes; you will use this video as the basis for
your Discussion post.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions:
What did the practitioner do well? In what areas can the practitioner improve?
At this point in the clinical interview, do you have any compelling concerns? If so, what are they?
What would be your next question, and why?
Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts do not have to be tailored to the patient in
the YMH Boston video.
Explain why a thorough psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent is important.
Describe two different symptom rating scales that would be appropriate to use during the
psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent.
Describe two psychiatric treatment options for children and adolescents that may not be used
when treating adults.
Explain the role parents/guardians play in assessment.
Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each
of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources. Discussion Assignment Question Paper
Learning Resources
Thapar, A., Pine, D. S., Leckman, J. F., Scott, S., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, E. A. (2015). Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry (6th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
· Chapter 32, “Clinical assessment and diagnostic formulation”
REQUIRED MEDIA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNF1FIKHKEU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gm3FLGxb2ZU
READING
Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
· Chapter 31, “Child Psychiatry”
Learning Resources
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat
06423a&AN=wal.EBC5108631&site=eds
–
live&scope=site
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb
&AN=134126845&site=eds
–
live&scope=site
Thapar, A., Pine, D. S.,
Leckman, J. F., Scott, S.,
Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, E. A. (2015).
Rutter’s child and
adolescent psychiatry
(6th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
·
Chapter 32, “Clinical assessment and diagnostic formulation”
REQUIRED MEDIA
https://video
–
alexanderstreet
–
com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/watch/mental
–
status
–
exam
–
b
–
6/cite?context=channel:volume
–
2
–
new
–
releases
–
assessment
–
tools
–
mental
–
status
–
exam
–
series
READING
Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015).
Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry
(11th ed.).
Wolters Kluwer.
·
Chapter 31, “C
hild Psychiatry”
Learning Resources
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat
06423a&AN=wal.EBC5108631&site=eds-live&scope=site
https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb
&AN=134126845&site=eds-live&scope=site
Thapar, A., Pine, D. S., Leckman, J. F., Scott, S., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, E. A. (2015). Rutter’s child and
adolescent psychiatry (6th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
Chapter 32, “Clinical assessment and diagnostic formulation”
REQUIRED MEDIA
https://video-alexanderstreet-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/watch/mental-status-exam-b-
6/cite?context=channel:volume-2-new-releases-assessment-tools-mental-status-exam-series
READING
Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (11th ed.).
Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 31, “Child Psychiatry”
RUBRIC TO FOLLOW
| Excellent | Good | Poor | ||
| Main Posting: Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. | 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s) Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth Supported by at least three current credible sources |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s) Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth Supported by at least three credible references |
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s) One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module Post is supported by fewer than two credible references |
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module Contains only one or no credible references |
| Main Posting: Writing | 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely Contains no grammatical or spelling errors Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style with minor errors |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors Contains some APA formatting errors |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style |
| Main Posting: Timely and full participation | 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation Posts main Discussion by due date |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Posts main Discussion by due date Meets requirements for full participation |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation Does not post main Discussion by due date |
| 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth. |
RUBRIC TO FOLLOW
Excelle
nt
Good
Poor
Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective
with critical analysis and synthesis representative
of knowledge gained from the course readings for
the module and current credible sources.
40
(40%)
–
44
(44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Di
scussion
question(s)
Is reflective with critical analysis and
synthesis representative of knowledge
gained from the course readings for the
module and current credible sources
No less than 75% of post has
exceptional depth and breadth
Supported by at le
ast three current
credible sources
35
(35%)
–
39
(39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion
question(s)
Is somewhat reflective with critical
analysis and synthesis representative of
knowledge gained from the course
readings for the module
50% of the post h
as exceptional depth
and breadth
Supported by at least three credible
references
31
(31%)
–
34
(34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion
question(s)
One to two criteria are not addressed
or are superficially addressed
Is somewhat lacking reflection and
c
ritical analysis and synthesis
Somewhat represents knowledge
gained from the course readings for the
module
Post is supported by fewer than two
credible references
0
(0%)
–
30
(30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion
question(s)
Lacks depth or superfici
ally addresses
criteria
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and
synthesis
Does not represent knowledge gained
from the course readings for the
module
Contains only one or no credible
references
Main Posting:
Writing
6
(6%)
–
6
(6%)
Written clearly
and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling
errors
Adheres to current APA manual writing
rules and style
5
(5%)
–
5
(5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or
spelling errors
Adheres to current APA manual writing
rules and style
with minor errors
4
(4%)
–
4
(4%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or
grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
0
(0%)
–
3
(3%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or
grammatical er
rors
Does not adhere to current APA
manual writing rules and style
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation
9
(9%)
–
10
(10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full,
and active participation
Posts main Discussion by due date
8
(8%)
–
8
(8%)
Posts main Discussion by due date
Meets requirements for full
participation
7
(7%)
–
7
(7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date
0
(0%)
–
6
(6%)
Does not meet requirements for full
participation
Does not post main Discussion by due
date
7
(7%)
–
7
(7%)
0
(0%)
–
6
(6%)
RUBRIC TO FOLLOW
Excellent Good Poor
Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective
with critical analysis and synthesis representative
of knowledge gained from the course readings for
the module and current credible sources.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion
question(s)
Is reflective with critical analysis and
synthesis representative of knowledge
gained from the course readings for the
module and current credible sources
No less than 75% of post has
exceptional depth and breadth
Supported by at least three current
credible sources
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion
question(s)
Is somewhat reflective with critical
analysis and synthesis representative of
knowledge gained from the course
readings for the module
50% of the post has exceptional depth
and breadth
Supported by at least three credible
references
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion
question(s)
One to two criteria are not addressed
or are superficially addressed
Is somewhat lacking reflection and
critical analysis and synthesis
Somewhat represents knowledge
gained from the course readings for the
module
Post is supported by fewer than two
credible references
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion
question(s)
Lacks depth or superficially addresses
criteria
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and
synthesis
Does not represent knowledge gained
from the course readings for the
module
Contains only one or no credible
references
Main Posting:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling
errors
Adheres to current APA manual writing
rules and style
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or
spelling errors
Adheres to current APA manual writing
rules and style with minor errors
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or
grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or
grammatical errors
Does not adhere to current APA
manual writing rules and style
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full,
and active participation
Posts main Discussion by due date
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Posts main Discussion by due date
Meets requirements for full
participation
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full
participation
Does not post main Discussion by due
date
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)