PSY 101 Week 3 Assignment
PSY 101 Week 3 Assignment
Then, review the PSY101 Outline and Annotated Bibliography Template, which contains the layout for this week’s assignment. Your outline must be one to two pages in length. Clearly identify the topic selected, and include major headings for the areas to be considered. PSY 101 Week 3 Assignment
ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
The major areas include:
- A well-written introduction and conclusion with a succinct thesis statement.
- Summarize your sources and analyze the findings from your research.
- Discuss the key issues and controversies surrounding your selected topic.
- Identify a variety of perspectives on the selected topic, so that the discussion is balanced and not one-sided.
- Distinguish how cognitive and behavioral implications might play a role in your selected topic. What learning principles could factor in with the topic? What theories of motivation and personality could influence your insights into the topic?
- Analyze any additional research that could be done in the future and provide solutions that could be implemented in the present regarding your selected topic.
Under each major heading, summarize your point about that heading. Subheadings should briefly summarize research that may both support and disagree with each viewpoint, if applicable. This outline will form your roadmap for creating your Final Paper.
In addition to your outline, submit a one- to two- page annotated bibliography of your scholarly sources for your Final Paper. Each source must include the APA formatted citation as well as a summary paragraph. The summary paragraph should contain four to five well-developed sentences in your own words (do not use the abstract included with journal articles) summarizing the source and describing its applicability to your selected topic. You are required to use a minimum of five scholarly sources that were published within the last five years and are cited according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Examples of scholarly sources include: peer-reviewed journal articles, research studies, professional websites with authored material, and government websites. Popular internet sites (Wikipedia, Newsweek, New York Times, etc.) are not considered scholarly sources. These sources will also be used for writing your Final Paper.
the topic is What techniques have professionals used to treat insomnia, and how effective are those treatments?
-
psy101_outline_and_annotated_bibliography_template_final.docABBREVIATED TITLE GOES HERE 1
ABBREVIATED TITLE GOES HERE 2
Title
Name
University
Title Goes Here Again
I. Summary and Analysis of the Research. Here you would provide a couple of well-developed sentences about the main point related to the topic selection.
A. Support for your major point would go here. Please provide another couple of well-developed sentences (in other words, not just four or five words), in which you summarize research or thoughts that may support or disagree with the point.
B. Once again, here you would provide support for your major point and provide a couple of well-developed sentences, in which you summarize research or thoughts that may support or disagree with the point.
1. If needed, you can include a support for the sub-point above. If you do, once again, you would simply provide another couple of sentences to support the point.
2. If needed, you can include more support for the sub-point above. If you do, once again, you would simply provide another couple of sentences to support the point.
II. Key Issues and Controversies. Again, provide a couple of well-developed sentences about the main point.
A. Support for your major point would go here. Please provide another couple of well-developed sentences (in other words, not just four or five words), in which you summarize research or thoughts that may support or disagree with the point.
B. Once again, here you would provide support for your major point and provide a couple of well-developed sentences, in which you summarize research or thoughts that may support or disagree with the point.
III. Multiple Perspectives on the Topic. Provide a couple of well-developed sentences about the main point.
A. Support for your major point would go here. Please provide another couple of well-developed sentences (in other words, not just four or five words), in which you summarize research or thoughts that may support or disagree with the point.
B. Once again, here you would provide support for your major point and provide a couple of well-developed sentences, in which you summarize research or thoughts that may support or disagree with the point.
IV. Analysis. Provide a couple of well-developed sentences about the main point.
A. Support for your major point would go here. Please provide another couple of well-developed sentences (in other words, not just four or five words), in which you summarize research or thoughts that may support or disagree with the point.
B. Once again, here you would provide support for your major point and provide a couple of well-developed sentences, in which you summarize research or thoughts that may support or disagree with the point.
V. Suggestions for Additional Research and Solutions. Provide a couple of well-developed sentences about the main point.
A. Support for your major point would go here. Please provide another couple of well-developed sentences (in other words, not just four or five words), in which you summarize research or thoughts that may support or disagree with the point.
B. Once again, here you would provide support for your major point and provide a couple of well-developed sentences, in which you summarize research or thoughts that may support or disagree with the point.
Annotated Bibliography
Adler, A. (1956). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler. New York. Harper & Row.
An annotation is a summary. So here you would simply include a summary of the source you reviewed for your outline and eventually your paper. Basically, you are telling your reader what this article or resource is about. You should also point out how this is applicable to your paper topic. The length will vary, but a good goal would be four or five well-developed sentences.
Klein, E., Herron, T., & Belcher, J. (2013). Attachment in the online classroom. Educational Psychology, 21, 101-125. doi: 10.1111/s10538-009-6204-0.
Again, simply include a summary of the source you reviewed for your outline and eventually your paper. Tell your reader what this article or resource is about and how it is applicable to your paper topic. Remember, you want to try and include four or five well-developed sentences.
LeFrancois, G. (2011). Psychology: The human puzzle. San Diego: CA, Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Again, simply include a summary of the source you reviewed for your outline and eventually your paper. Tell your reader what this article or resource is about and how it is applicable to your paper topic. Remember, you want to try and include four or five well-developed sentences.
Perkins, C., & Murphy, E. (2006). Identifying and measuring individual engagement in critical thinking in online discussions: An exploratory case study. Educational Technology & Society, 9, 298-307.
Again, simply include a summary of the source you reviewed for your outline and eventually your paper. Tell your reader what this article or resource is about and how it is applicable to your paper topic. Remember, you want to try and include four or five well-developed sentences.
Zimmer, C. (2008). The search for intelligence. Scientific American, 299, 68-69.
Again, simply include a summary of the source you reviewed for your outline and eventually your paper. Tell your reader what this article or resource is about and how it is applicable to your paper topic. Remember, you want to try and include four or five well-developed sentences. PSY 101 Week 3 Assignment