Ethical Consultation Discussion Assignment
Ethical Consultation Discussion Assignment
Dr. Jamison has joined a group practice of psychologists who have asked her to develop her biography to post with her picture on their social media page. They have asked Dr. Jamison to reach out to her former clients from her last employer to solicit testimonials. Dr. Jamison is very concerned about this request. She was unaware the group practice had a social media page. When she visits the page, she sees several client testimonials for other psychologists in practice, some of which appear to reveal identifying information about the clients. Ethical Consultation Discussion Assignment
ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
In 850 words:
1. Describe the ethical issues involved in this situation.
2. Discuss the steps Dr. Jamison should take with regard to her discovery of potential ethical concerns.
3. Provide recommendations for the group’s advertising needs that would meet ethical standards.
Use two to three scholarly sources to support your claims.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
-
Topic6Rubric_Print_Format1.xlsx
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points PSY-510 PSY-510-O500 Case Study: Ethical Consultation 100.0 Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned Content 70.0% Describe the ethical issues involved in the situation. 25.0% Essay omits or incompletely describes ethical issues involved in the situation. Essay inadequately describes ethical issues involved in the situation, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay adequately describes ethical issues involved in the situation, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay clearly describes ethical issues involved in the situation, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay expertly describes ethical issues involved in the situation, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Discuss the steps needed upon discovery of potential ethical concerns. 25.0% Essay omits or incompletely discusses the steps needed upon discovery of potential ethical concerns. Essay inadequately discusses the steps needed upon discovery of potential ethical concerns. Discussion is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay adequately discusses the steps needed upon discovery of potential ethical concerns, but discussion is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay clearly discusses the steps needed upon discovery of potential ethical concerns., and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay expertly discusses the steps needed upon discovery of potential ethical concerns, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Explain some recommendations you would make to the supervisor and the group practice to align their advertising with ethical standards. 20.0% Essay omits or incompletely explains some recommendation. Essay inadequately explains some recommendations is vague and inconsistent. Explanation is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay adequately explains some recommendation, but explanation is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay clearly explains some recommendation, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay expertly explains some recommendation, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Total Weightage 100% -
Topic6Ethical.pdf
Can we ask clients for testimonials?
Full Text
Listen
Dilemmas
This month’s dilemma Sherifa completed her counselling qualifications three years ago. However, she has been
unable to find paid employment as a counsellor. Although she has continued to work in a voluntary capacity in order to maintain her practice, she has become increasingly frustrated and has decided to set herself up in private practice.
As a first step, she enrolled on and completed a business start-up course, where she was advised to set up a website and to include testimonials from her current clients at her placement. However Sherifa has just seen a conversation on a social networking site where some members have suggested that this is not wise. What are the ethical issues involved and what should Sherifa do? Opinions expressed in these responses are those of the writers alone and not necessarily those of the column editor or of BACP.
Andrea Sheehy
Marriage and couple counsellor, website design and development I can understand why Sherifa’s business start-up course has recommended that she use client testimonials. They can be powerfully persuasive in a marketing package that includes a professional-looking website, high quality photographs and verifiable details.
However, the essence of this dilemma is to be found in the conflict of interest between the benefits for the therapist of obtaining a testimonial and ensuring the integrity of the relationship for the client.
The BACP Ethical Framework suggests that a resolution of this conflict should be biased heavily in the best
interests of the client. Therefore Sherifa should discuss the soliciting of testimonials with her placement manager and supervisor before proceeding. For example, I can see a conflict of interest if testimonials from placement clients are used to promote Sherifa’s private practice.
In addition, supposing Sherifa were to solicit her clients for testimonials. I wonder how many would feel free to
express reservations or refuse. Sherifa would need to satisfy herself (and her placement manager) that she was
ensuring the integrity of the relationship, and this may be difficult to do. Wouldn’t it be anti-therapeutic for a client who is being treated with dignity and respect possibly for the first time in their life to be asked this? Aren’t they going to feel obliged to help the person who has helped them? Ethical Consultation Discussion Assignment
Arguably the soliciting of a testimonial creates a dual relationship. The Ethical Framework says: ‘The existence of a dual relationship with a client is seldom neutral and can have a powerful… impact… For these reasons practitioners are required to… avoid entering into relationships that are likely to be detrimental…’
A problem with testimonials is that they can imply that a benefit that one client has experienced from therapy will be universally available to all potential clients. This is not the nature of such a diverse practice as therapy and such testimonials could be interpreted as a misrepresentation of the work of the therapeutic community. While it is true that some therapists produce consistently better outcomes for their clients than others, arguably what these therapists are good at is motivating the client to engage in the work that they themselves need to do for therapy to be effective.
Testimonials can be anti-therapeutic because they collude with the client who seeks to project the responsibility for effecting change onto the therapist. It could also be argued that the client who writes a glowing testimonial is discounting the work that they have put in and their courage in facing their demons.
Monitoring our services through feedback is vital and positive feedback is always gratifying but there are many
sound ethical reasons not to make them public. Satisfied clients often do become our best sources of future referrals and there are plenty of ways that Sherifa’s clients can make their voices heard effectively without involving herdirectly.
Rob Hammond
Personal consultant, integrative coach-therapist
Sherifa should first consider the ethical guidelines of her professional body. There maybe nothing specific about testimonials in the guidelines but they will make clear that the individual practitioner is accountable for her actions and needs to be able to justify them if she is challenged. Ethical Consultation Discussion Assignment
Ultimately those of us in private practice are running a business and ‘social proof in the form of client testimonials is a powerful advertising tool. But before requesting client testimonials Sherifa must consider the ability of each client to be objective about her request. Therapy should work towards a client being self-directing in their life. However, given the in-built power imbalance within the therapeutic relationship, extreme care must be taken that a client
doesn’t feel under an obligation to provide a testimonial. Equally, Sherifa needs to be sure that her client isn’t
investing her with undue responsibility for their wellbeing, thereby negating their own part in their progress.
On the other hand, to deny a client the opportunity to publicly state their successful outcome from therapy, in the interest of future clients, would seem unfair.
Sadly there is still a certain amount of social stigma around receiving therapy. Client testimonials help to reduce the stigma of therapy and reinforce the notion that it is natural and acceptable. If a potential client is feeling nervous about starting therapy, or is unsure of what to expect, feedback from previous clients can be a useful way to make them feel more at ease.
There are numerous ways for Sherifa to gather testimonials. She could give clients a satisfaction questionnaire, with a box to tick to give permission to use their comments and a stamped, addressed envelope for them to post it back to her when they are ready. She could send clients a follow-up email once therapy has ended asking if they would consider supplying a testimonial. Ethical Consultation Discussion Assignment
Sherifa should always explain how their feedback will be used (eg on her website), whether it will be anonymised, how long will it be on view etc, and obtain the client’s permission for this.
If the option of testimonials is openly discussed and the client is fully able to be objective about the request and to make an informed decision, then I don’t see that there is any problem.
Helen Cooke Volunteer MBACP (Accred) counsellor
The pages of Therapy Today are heavy with references to the lack of paid work in our profession and Sherifa’s
dilemma reflects this difficult issue. Her situation has left me wondering what drives her counselling career and
about the nature of her professional relationships.
For example, what do we understand by having ‘completed’ our qualifications? Counselling training is not a finite process and is often described as a journey, but Sherifa talks of ‘maintaining’ her practice rather than developing it (and herself). Perhaps her motives are purely strategic, so frustration at being unable to take the next step to employment is completely understandable. Will she devote energy to processing these feelings before she risks carrying them forward into the work with her private practice clients?
Sherifa’s entrepreneurial flair is to be encouraged. However, she has chosen what sounds like a generic business course where the unique aspects of our profession are unlikely to be catered for. The BACP Ethical Framework encourages us to be open to and conscientious in considering feedback from colleagues, and we can benefit enormously from their guidance and advice. Have Shefira’s peers fallen by the wayside in her quest for progression?
Similarly, the question of whether or not to publish client testimonials on her website has arisen vicariously, through coming across online postings between other people. Her dilemma centres on client confidentiality, which is a hugely significant and precious element, yet she seems so isolated professionally.
Her intention to acquire testimonials from placement clients sounds very worrying. Trustworthiness, the BACP
Ethical Framework tells us, requires us to ‘restrict any disclosure of confidential information about clients to
furthering the purposes for which it was originally disclosed’, so client feedback provided to the agency cannot be ‘lifted’ for secondary uses. There are also Data Protection Act implications. For Sherifa to seek feedback separately and overtly for her own promotional purposes, even with the knowledge and blessing of the agency, leaves me struggling to imagine how this could be safely managed. Crucially, what are the implications for the therapeutic relationship of this potential ‘gift’ from the client, or for clients who refuse the request? Sherifa needs to discuss all her plans with her placement supervisor without delay to ensure there are no current or
potential boundary breaches. Here they might explore ways to help her connect and flourish, including exploration of the wealth of resources that BACP membership confers (eg relevant CPD workshops, the BACP Private Practice division, regional networking days, local network groups, perhaps even setting one up in her area).
Sherifa might also take time to reflect on the personal moral qualities of humility and integrity while assessing her priorities as a practitioner. She may decide to slow down her business-minded drive for the time being if it risks overtaking the application of good ethical practice. Glowing testimonials are of no value if the method of acquisition sends her crashing headlong into the sanctions pages of Therapy Today.
December’s dilemma Ken and Rob both work for a telephone counselling organisation and chat via Skype once or twice a month, often about clients.
One day Rob confides that he is not qualified; he completed a four-year psychotherapy training but did not take the final examinations. His CV states that he is a trained psychotherapist and he was not asked to produce documents before being appointed. Ken is rather shocked but decides to do nothing as Rob has not actually lied about his lack of qualifications.
However, Rob is now under investigation as a former client has complained that he was not qualified or competent to deal with her needs and terminated therapy with him abruptly. Rob has asked Ken to write a letter of support, in particular saying that he is familiar with his work and that he is competent to deal with complex issues.
What are Ken’s options and what should he do? Email your responses (500 words maximum) to Heather Dale at hjdale@gmail.com by 26 November 2014. Readers are welcome to send in suggestions for dilemmas to be considered for publication, but these will not be answered personally.
Copyright of Therapy Today is the property of British Association for Counselling & Psychotherapy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. Ethical Consultation Discussion Assignment
-
Topic6EthicalConsultation.pdf