+1 601-680-9567
ORDER NOW

Assignment: Constructing 10 Strategic Points

Assignment: Constructing 10 Strategic Points

Assignment: Constructing 10 Strategic Points

Directions:

  1. Review the 10 Strategic Points constructed in Week 2 and the Clark and Springer (2007) study. Additionally, review the feedback provided by the instructor.
  2. Use “Constructing 10 Strategic Points” to develop 10 Strategic Points for a replication of the Clark & Springer study that you could design for an undergraduate psychology program. Be sure to use resources in the DC network>Research/Dissertation tab> Prospectus templates to review the criteria for the purpose, problem, research questions and other Strategic Points.
  3. Use the prompts and suggestions contained in the template to guide your work. Assignment: Constructing 10 Strategic Points

  4. ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

  • attachment

    Rubric_Print_Format_wk5.xlsx

    Rubic_Print_Format

    Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
    RES-855 RES-855-O500 Constructing 10 Strategic Points 255.0
    Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
    Content 70.0%
    Identify 10 Strategic Points 18.0% All 10 points have not been identified. Discussion is not present. Not all 10 points have been identified. Discussion is incomplete. All 10 points have been identified. Discussion is done at a perfunctory level. All 10 points have been identified. Discussion is detailed and mostly comprehensive. All 10 points have been identified. Discussion is thorough and comprehensive.
    Include Problem and Purpose Statement 18.0% Problem and purpose statement are not present. Problem and purpose statement are present, but incomplete. Problem and purpose statement are present, but done at a perfunctory level. Problem and purpose statement are present. Statements are detailed. Problem and purpose statement are present. Statements are comprehensive and astutely identified.
    Describe Phenomena 17.0% The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has not been identified. The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified, but is incomplete. The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified, but at a perfunctory level. The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified and discussion is detailed. The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified and discussion is thorough and comprehensive.
    Describe Methodology, Instruments, and Data Analysis Approach 17.0% Methodology, instruments, and data analysis approach have not been identified. Methodology, instruments, and data analysis approach have been identified, but incomplete. Methodology, instruments, and data analysis approach have been identified, but at a perfunctory level. Methodology, instruments, and data analysis approach have been identified and discussion is detailed. Methodology, instruments, and data analysis approach have been identified and discussion is thorough and comprehensive.
    Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
    Thesis Development and Purpose 20.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication.
    Format 10.0%
    Mechanics of Writing 5.0% Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
    APA Format 5.0% Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Required format is used correctly, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication.
    Total Weightage 100%
  • attachment

    RES-855.RS.Constructing10StrategicPoints_wk5.docx

    College of Doctoral Studies

    RES-855 Resource

      10 Strategic Points Comments or Feedback
    Broad Topic Area Incivility in psychology undergraduate education programs  
    Lit Review Include citations from studies on incivility in psychology education.  
    Problem Statement Write a problem for the psychology study, in the GCU required format.

     

    		  
    Research Questions Now frame questions for a like study to be conducted in undergraduate psychology programs.  
    Sample Describe the sampling strategy you could use for a like study in an undergraduate psychology program. Define and justify the sampling strategy from a research source. Justify the sample size for a qualitative study from a research source and from the GCU Core Design Document.  
    Describe the Phenomenon    
    Methodology and Design Describe the method and design you would use and justify your choice of both from a research source.  
    Purpose Statement Develop a purpose statement for a psychology undergraduate program in the required GCU format.  
    Data Collection Instruments and Approach Describe the IHE instrument to be used in this study.

    Describe the data collection approach you would use, including getting informed consent and how you would protect the confidentiality of participants.

    		  
    Data Analysis Approach Discuss a specific data analysis strategy you would use in your replication study in an undergraduate psychology program. Cite a specific researcher’s strategy such as Hatch, Miles and Huberman, Bogden and Biklin, or Saldana.  

     

     

    © 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.