Milestone 3: Applying The APA Code of Ethics Assignment
Milestone 3: Applying The APA Code of Ethics Assignment
Submit Milestone Three of your final project. In this milestone, apply the APA Code of Ethics to your chosen case study vignette and expand the outline of your final case study analysis paper you began in Milestone Two.
ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
For additional details, please refer to the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric document. attached below and milestone 2 outline to add on to this milestone 3 outline.
(APA CODE OF ETHICS ARTICLE LINK) https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index
-
CasestudyoutlineWindyFluffballEDITED.edited.docxETHICAL CONFLICTS AND INTERACTIONS 1
ETHICAL CONFLICTS AND INTERACTIONS 3
Ethical Conflicts and Interactions
Case study: Windy Fluffball
Lesly Ulloa
Ethics in Psychology
Dr. Pamela Fitzpatrick
Case Study Abstract
This event emphasizes the lawful testament of a skilled observer: Dr. Windy Fluffball and his documents remained overstated in addition uncertain. This study will provide a contrast to the APA ethics code and will decide the key elements alleged. Integrity is the primary issue amongst all other issues presented. To examine this case successfully, it is significant to emphasize the ethical model’s decision-making and focus on the APA ethics code. Utilizing these assets can easily show how Dr. Fluffball performed unethically in a case where his documents were required for the success of a public claim of the illegal end.
Detailed Case Study Description
Windy Fluffball decided to work as a skilled witness in a civic complaint that involved wrongful cessation of a medical consciousness alumnus student from a Doctor of Philosophy platform. Dr. Fluffball showed his year in tutoring in addition to his involvement in the Nationwide Emotional Civilization’s Teaching and Misunderstanding Group. Although on questioning, Dr. Fluffball had been mandated to disclose he did not have any teaching, his doctorate was in physical consciousness, that he had no medical training of any type, he had not served as a worker in a medical psychology platform, and he was not an authorized psychologist. Even though Dr. Fluffball had won a selection to the expert consciousness relation, he had to attend any gathering (McClung,2020). Due to Dr. Fluffball’s lack of truthfulness, there was very little weight given to his testament in decision-making, which led to a decision that preferred on the side. Leaving the alumnus student astonished, wondering could he have won the case if Dr. Fluffball could not have worked as a skilled witness expert.
Ethical Conflict
Lack of integrity is the key element in this case study that Dr. Fluffball showed based on his prerequisite that made everyone trust him to serve excellently as a skilled witness in the cour (McClung, 2020)t. Nevertheless, this was much contrary to fact. It’s recorded in the APA ethic code of conduct that “mentalists pursue and endorse truthfulness, trustworthiness, and straightforwardness, discipline, education also exercises consciousness. In these duties’ professionals don’t snip, lie, or else involved in the black market, deception, or worldwide falsification of circumstance. emotionalists struggle and preserve their potentials to evade imprudent and indistinct obligations. circumstances where dishonesty could be morally defensible to get the best out of benefits and lessen harm, psychologists have a thoughtful responsibility to contemplate the necessity for, the likely penalties of, and their duty to spot on any subsequent suspicion or other destructive things that ascend from the usage of such methods”.
Some occupations call for users to apply an extraordinary level of faith in specialists. These include certified public accountants, public prosecutors, medics, and actual lands managers. Consumers must believe the specialists since they are skilled (Sharma, 2020). Nevertheless, any individual who is trusted so much ends up abusing it. For the calling to police force itself and defend the guiltless user, the respective members of this ability are expected to utter profanities to honor a code of deportment to be authorized to conduct the duties. Suppose the skilled expert does contrary to the code of deportment. In that case, an appraisal committee decides what extent the violation was and decides the consequence, which can comprise excluding his or her authorization to exercise. Some of the things that could have an expert uncovered of his authorization include robbery, revealing individual or advantaged facts, or being solely uncaring in the management of a dispute (Sharma, 2020). Milestone 3: Applying The APA Code of Ethics Assignment
References
McClung, N., Chamberland, M., Kinlaw, K., Matthew, D. B., Wallace, M., Bell, B. P., … & Dooling, K. (2020). The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ ethical principles for allocating initial supplies of COVID-19 vaccine—the United States, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(47), 1782.
Sharma, K., Fiechter, M., George, T., Young, J., Alexander, J. S., Bijoor, A., … & Mishra, C. (2020). Conservation and people: Towards an ethical code of conduct for camera traps in wildlife research: ecological Solutions and Evidence, 1(2).
-
PSY570MilestoneThreeGuidelinesandRubric1.pdf
PSY 570 Final Project Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt: The four milestone assignments in this course will prepare you to complete your final project, a case study analysis. In Milestone Three, you will apply the APA Code of Ethics to your chosen case study vignette and expand the outline of your final case study analysis paper you began in Milestone Two.
In order to understand how your ethical conflict in your case study is in conflict with ethics you will need to understand the dominant ethical code. Professionals in the field of psychology refer to the APA Code of Ethics in order to guide their decision making in their work environments. The American Psychological Association website provides the APA Code of Ethics, which is used in psychology.
For Milestone Three, return to your outline and work on elements 5, 6, and 7 (highlighted in the outline template below). For elements 5 and 6, you will list and define each principle and standard in an organized fashion. You will then emphasize (highlight, bold, or summarize) which principle and standard could be at question in your case study vignette. For element 7, you will make a statement discussing the cultural and social considerations in your case. All cases have considerations of this kind, but they may be less obvious in some case studies. You may also choose to create a hypothetical cultural or social consideration (e.g., What if a language barrier were present in your case study vignette?) for your case if you do not think it has one. You will expand upon element 7 in Milestone Four.
1. Title Page 2. Case Study Analysis Abstract 3. Detailed Case Study Vignette Description 4. The Ethical Conflict 5. The APA Code of Ethics Principles
a. Identify and define all five principles b. Highlight, bold, or summarize all that might apply to your case study vignette’s ethical conflict c. Justify why highlighted or bolded principles apply to your case study vignette’s ethical conflict
6. The APA Code of Ethics Standards a. List and define all ten standards b. Highlight, bold, or summarize all that might apply to your case study vignette’s ethical conflict c. Justify why highlighted or bolded standards apply to your case study vignette’s ethical conflict
7. Statement of Culture and Social Orientations in the Case Study 8. Statement of Dual Relationships or Multiple Relationship Issues in the Study 9. The Ethical Decision-Making Model (Eight-Step Model) 10. An Alternative Decision-Making Model 11. Summary and Conclusion
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2–3 page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one- inch margins, with any sources referenced cited in APA format.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
APA Code of Ethics: Principles
Meets “Proficient” criteria and justifies why identified principles might apply to case’s ethical conflict
Lists and defines all principles in an organized fashion and identifies which principles might apply to case’s ethical conflict
Lists and defines all principles in an organized fashion
Does not list and define all principles in an organized fashion
25
APA Code of Ethics: Standards
Meets “Proficient” criteria and justifies why identified standards might apply to case’s ethical conflict
Lists and defines all standards in an organized fashion and identifies which standards might apply to case’s ethical conflict
Lists and defines all standards in an organized fashion
Does not list and define all standards in an organized fashion
25
Statement of Culture and Social Orientations in the
Case Study
Meets “Proficient” criteria and illustrates considerations with examples from contemporary problems
Identifies and explains cultural and social considerations in case or creates a hypothetical cultural or social consideration if case does not have one
Identifies cultural and social considerations in case or creates a hypothetical cultural or social considerations if case does not have one but does not explain them
Does not identify and explain cultural and social considerations in case or create a hypothetical cultural or social considerations
20
APA Writing No errors related to APA style or citations
Minor errors related to APA style and citations
Some errors related to APA style and citations
Major errors related to APA style and citations
15
Articulation of Response
Submission is free of errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format with language that is appropriate to the intended audience
Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, organization or audience-appropriate terminology
Submission has major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, organization, or audience-appropriate language that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, organization, or audience-specific language that prevent understanding of ideas
15
Earned Total 100%