Bowen Family Theory Questions

Bowen Family Theory Questions

Bowen Family Theory Questions

  • attachment

    FARSCase-Case3_CharitableContributionsandDebt-AComparisonofSt.JudeChildrensResearchHospital_ALSACandUniversalHealthServices.pdf

    ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

    PRINTED BY: 1stladyalix@email.phoenix.edu. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher’s prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    CASE 3: Charitable Contributions and Debt: A Comparison of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital/ALSAC and Universal Health Services

    CASE TOPICS OUTLINE

    1. St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital/ALSAC

    A. Primary Objective

    B. Sources of Capital

    C. Reporting Practices

    2. Universal Health Services

    A. Investor-Owned Hospital

    B. Debt Including Leases

    3. Comparison

    Hospitals are an industry in which both not-for-profits and investor-owned

    facilities operate. The sources of capital available to the not-for-profits include

    charitable contributions and debt offerings—unless they are governmental, in

    which case, higher taxes are also an alternative. Debt availability is always, in part,

    a function of performance, and just as failures have arisen in both sectors, about

    one-third of the investor-owned hospitals have been described as losing money. Of

    interest is how can one effectively evaluate such an industry, with this type of

    diversity in organizational forms and capital availability? A necessary prerequisite

    to such an evaluation is to have a firm understanding of how charitable

    contributions are presented.

    St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital/ALSAC has the mission of finding cures for

    children with catastrophic diseases through research and treatment. For the fiscal

    year 1999, this entity reported total assets of $221,664,232 and income of

    5.2-3

    5.3-1

     

     

    $177,071,890. A Web site at http://www.stjude.org, as well as Guidestar’s listing,

    references a Form 990 (Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax) filing,

    availability of audited financial statements upon request, and information that the

    hospital has 2,100 employees and 350 volunteers. Founded in 1962, the

    organization seeks funds

     

     

    PRINTED BY: 1stladyalix@email.phoenix.edu. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher’s prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    from contributions and grants for unrestricted operating expenses, specific

    projects, buildings, and endowments. More than 4,000 patients are seen annually,

    with a hospital maintaining 56 beds. The Form 990, Part III states that the hospital

    provided 15,231 inpatient days of care during the fiscal year and patients made

    40,982 clinic visits. ALSAC is the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities,

    Inc., the fund-raising arm of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. It reported 1999

    total assets of $1,007,699,320 and income of $274,123,399. This organization reports

    the number of employees as 565 and the number of volunteers as 800,000. With its

    sole focus on the hospital, ALSAC’s self-description explains that no child has ever

    been turned away due to an inability to pay for treatment and explains key

    accomplishments in the research area achieved by St. Jude’s research and

    treatment of children with catastrophic diseases. What is borne out by the example

    of St. Jude is the fact that a review of the Form 990 filed for the fiscal year ending

    6/30/99 indicates in Part VI the names of related organizations: ALSAC and St. Jude

    Hospital Foundation, both of which are tax exempt. To gain a sense of capital

    availability to a not-for-profit entity, affiliated entities must be considered. In

    addition, the role of volunteers is a source of human capital not effectively

    captured within the framework of financial statements for not-for-profits, as

    reflected in the Form 990 for the fiscal year ending 6/30/99 for ALSAC, which states

    in Part VI: Bowen Family Theory Questions

    Unpaid volunteers have made significant contributions of their time, principally in

    fund-raising activities. The value of these services is not recognized in the financial

    statements since it is not susceptible to an objective measurement or valuation and

    because the activities of these volunteers are not subject to the operating

    supervision and control present in an employer/employee relationship.

    Hence, as one evaluates capital sources and uses by not-for-profits, care is needed

    to consider affiliated organizations’ role, total contributions, and the effect of

    volunteerism on the comparability between not-for-profit and investor-owned

    operations. Bowen Family Theory Questions

    Universal Health Services, Inc. filed its 10-K on March 28, 2001, for the calendar

    year 2000, which includes comparative information for 1999. Analysts have

    5.3-1

    5.3-2

     

     

    described the company as the most aggressive company in the industry over the

    1999–2001 time frame in making acquisitions, particularly of not-for-profit

    operations and investor-owned operations experiencing losses. The company is

    praised for it high operating leverage, the relatively small number of shareholders

    relative to the magnitude of total revenue, and stock price as a multiple of

    earnings. The company operates 59 hospitals and, as of 1999, had an average

    number of licensed beds of 4,806 at acute care hospitals and 1,976 at behavioral

    health centers, with patient days of 963,842 and 444,632, respectively. Of interest is

    a commentary on the competition found in the company’s filing:

    Competition

    In all geographical areas in which the Company operates, there are other hospitals

    which provide services comparable to those offered by the Company’s hospitals,

    some of which are owned by governmental agencies and supported by tax

    revenues, and others of which are owned by nonprofit corporations and may be

    supported to a large extent by endowments and charitable contributions. Such

    support is not available to the Company’s hospitals. Certain of the Company’s

    competitors have greater financial resources, are better equipped and offer a

    broader range of services than the Company. Outpatient treatment and diagnostic

    facilities, outpatient surgical centers and freestanding ambulatory surgical centers

    also impact the healthcare marketplace. In recent years, competition

     

     

     

    PRINTED BY: 1stladyalix@email.phoenix.edu. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher’s prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    among healthcare providers for patients has intensified as hospital occupancy

    rates in the United States have declined due to, among other things, regulatory and

    technological changes, increasing use of managed care payment systems, cost

    containment pressures, a shift toward outpatient treatment and an increasing

    supply of physicians. The Company’s strategies are designed, and management

    believes that its facilities are positioned, to be competitive under these changing

    circumstances. (Source: 10-K filed 3/28/2001)

    Financial information is provided in Tables 5.3-1 and 5.3-2 for both the not-for-

    profit and the investor-owned hospitals. Bowen Family Theory Questions

    Table 5.3-1: Financial Comparisons of the Not-for- Profit Entities

    5.3-2

    5.3-3

     

     

     

    PRINTED BY: 1stladyalix@email.phoenix.edu. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher’s prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Fiscal Year Ended 1999

    St. Jude Children’s

    Research Hospital Form 990*

    American Lebanese Syrian Associated

    Charities, Inc. (ALSAC) Form 990*

    Contributions, gifts, grants and similar amounts received: Direct public support

    $91,978,426 $231,793,748

    Indirect public support    2,906,934

    Government contributions (grants)

    31,469,447

    Program service revenue, including government fees and contracts (i.e., health insurance revenue)

    46,034,710

    Accounts receivable 24,217,029    4,230,764

    Pledges receivable   23,604,748

    Allowance for doubtful accounts

    9,363,328

    Program service expenses   99,282,906

    Program service expenses: Research

    87,225,830

    5,471,186

    5.3-3

    5.3-4

     

     

     

    Fiscal Year Ended 1999

    St. Jude Children’s

    Research Hospital Form 990*

    American Lebanese Syrian Associated

    Charities, Inc. (ALSAC) Form 990*

    Program service expenses: Education and training

    Program service expenses: Medical Services

    93,735,602

    Reconciliation of revenue, gains, and other support to audited numbers: net unrealized gains on investments

    −4,023,815   65,891,269

    Deferred grant revenue  1,857,628 (Statement 5)

    Support from American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, Inc.

    91,978,426 (Statement 7)

    91,978,426 (paid per Statements 4, 6)

    Excluded contributions 2,746,295 (Statement 1)

    Excess or (deficit) for the year −10,933,191  120,521,982

    Net assets or fund balances at end of year

    199,707,440  994,501,910

    Temporarily restricted  15,715,890

    Permanently restricted 14,000,000 247,147,826

    Total liabilities 21,956,792   7,017,192

     

     

     

     

    Fiscal Year Ended 1999

    St. Jude Children’s

    Research Hospital Form 990*

    American Lebanese Syrian Associated

    Charities, Inc. (ALSAC) Form 990*

    Schedule of deferred debits & credits by contract (FAS 116 adjustment noted to result in this deferred revenue)

    157,628

    The GuideStar.org Web site (http://www.guidestar.org) provides access to Forms 990 in .PDF

    format.

    Table 5.3-2: Universal Health Services, Inc.’s Financial Excerpts*

    Income Statements (in thousands) Reported 1999 Calendar Year

    Net revenues $2,042,380

    Operating charges 1,913,346

    Components:

    Salaries, wages, and benefits   793,529

    Provision for doubtful accounts   166,139

    Lease and rental expense    49,029

    Interest expense, net    26,872

    Net income    77,775

    *

     

     

     

    Income Statements (in thousands) Reported 1999 Calendar Year

    Total assets 1,497,973

    Total liabilities   856,362

    Total retained earnings   482,960

    Capital stock       306

    Paid-in capital in excess of par   158,345

    The 10-K filing as of 3/28/2001 at EDGAR (http://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml) provides financial

    statement information for 2000 and 1999.

    Requirement A: Recording Revenue

    1. What is meant by the reference in Table 5.3-1 to an FAS 116 adjustment?

    2. How are contributions recorded? Is there a distinction between pledges

    receivable and accounts receivable?

    *

     

     

     

    PRINTED BY: 1stladyalix@email.phoenix.edu. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher’s prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    3. Are there circumstances when financial statements can quantify volunteers’

    services?

    4. Can financial statement users of not-for-profit hospitals’ financial statements

    expect to be fully informed regarding affiliated parties, such as the linkages

    between St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, ALSAC, and the foundation

    cited? Explain.

    Requirement B: Revenue Mix (Strategy-Related Considerations)

    The 10-K filing of Universal Health Services, Inc. describes the mix of revenue

    sources, as depicted in Table 5.3-3.

    Table 5.3-3: Patient Revenue Mix

    PERCENTAGE OF NET PATIENT REVENUES

    2000 1999 1998 1997 1996

    Third Party Payors

    Medicare 32.3% 33.5% 34.3% 35.6% 35.6%

    Medicaid 11.5% 12.6% 11.3% 14.5% 15.3%

    Managed Care (HMOs and PPOs)

    34.5% 31.5% 27.2% 19.1% N/A

    N/A-Not available (Source: 10-K filed 3/28/2001)

    5.3-4

    5.3-5

     

     

     

    PERCENTAGE OF NET PATIENT REVENUES

    2000 1999 1998 1997 1996

    Other Sources 21.7% 22.4% 27.2% 30.8% 49.1%

    Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

    N/A-Not available (Source: 10-K filed 3/28/2001)

    1. How does this revenue mix compare with the revenue blend of the not-for-

    profit entity, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (ALSAC)? Access the latest

    SEC filing and compare the reported revenue mix; has it changed?

    2. What does that imply as to the strategies of investor-owned hospitals in

    managing risk and ensuring adequate capital relative to not-for-profit entities?

    An opportunity exists to explore the greater social and political questions that

    are frequently debated about the compatibility of profit-oriented entities and

    quality of health care, relative to not-for-profit entities. As background, identify

    what the latest SEC filings report concerning charity care. Bowen Family Theory Questions

    Directed Self-Study

    Access the 10-Q (from sec.gov) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 and

    explain how Hurricane Katrina affected Universal Health Services. The same 10-Q

    reports on a funding commitment the company has made to the alma mater of the

    Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. Describe the

    disclosure and explain why the event is an “Other Related Party Transaction.”

    [Download the 10-Q in text format and apply the Find capability in your word

    processor. Also access FARS and identify the guidance relevant to each event.]

     

     

    PRINTED BY: 1stladyalix@email.phoenix.edu. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher’s prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Health Insurance, Public Policy, and Backdating

    A key factor in the health care industry is health insurance. Public policy has

    debated universal health care, changes to governmental programs such as

    Medicare, adjustment of tax policy regarding employers’ and employees’ deduction

    for premiums, and alternative approaches to this sector of the economy. State and

    local governments, under a new accounting rule, have recently estimated their

    total retiree health bill to be about $1.1 trillion. Over the past decade, some

    governmental units used pension funds to help pay for double-digit growth in

    health care for retired public workers. Explain how accounting interacts with

    public policy. Use FARS as a resource, according particular attention to FAS 158.

    Health insurer UnitedHealth has been the focus of media coverage involving what

    is known as the “options backdating scandal”. UnitedHealth’s internal probe

    estimates its past decade exposure at half a billion dollars (“UnitedHealth Faces

    Formal Probe,” Wall Street Journal, December 27, 2006, p. B8). Is there a

    relationship between the magnitude of the restatement and the nature of the

    health care sector of the economy? Explain. The SEC’s Division of Corporation

    Finance shared a “Sample Letter Sent in Response to Inquiries Related to Filing

    Restated Financial Statements for Errors in Accounting for Stock Option Grants”

    dated January 2007

    (http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/oilgasltr012007.htm.) How

    helpful do you find such guidance?

    Key Terms and Glossary

    fund balance

    “refers … to a common group of assets and related liabilities within a not-for-

    profit organization and to the net amount of those assets and liabilities… .

    While some not-for-profit organizations may choose to classify assets and

    liabilities into fund groups, information about those groupings is not a

    necessary part of general purpose external financial reporting” (CON6,

    5.3-5

    5.3-6

     

     

    Footnote 45); fund balances may refer to such fund groups as operating,

    plant, endowment, and other funds (FAS 117, Par. 98).

    permanent restriction

    “A donor-imposed restriction that stipulates that resources be maintained

    permanently but permits the organization to use up or expend part or all of

    the income (or other economic benefits) derived from the donated assets”

    (FAS 117, Par. 168). Information about permanent restrictions is useful in

    determining the extent to which an organization’s net assets are not a source

    of cash for payments to present or prospective lenders, suppliers, or

    employees and thus are not expected to be directly available for providing

    services or paying creditors (FAS 117, Par. 98).

    pledges

    receipts of promises to give

    temporary restriction

    “A donor-imposed restriction that permits the donee organization to use up

    or expend the donated assets as specified and is satisfied either by the

    passage of time or by actions of the organization” (FAS 117, Par. 168).

    Separate line items may be reported within temporarily restricted net assets

    or in notes to financial statements to distinguish between temporary

    restrictions for (a) support of particular operating activities, (b) investment

    for a specified term, (c) use in a specified future period, or (d) acquisition of

    long-lived assets. Donors’ temporary restrictions may require that resources

    be used in a later period or after a specified date (time restrictions), or that

    resources be used for a specified purpose (purpose restrictions), or both. For

    example, gifts of cash and other assets with stipulations that they be invested

    to provide a source of income for a specified term and that the income be

    used for a specified purpose are both time and purpose restricted. Those gifts

    often are called term endowments (FAS 117, Par. 15).

     

     

    PRINTED BY: 1stladyalix@email.phoenix.edu. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher’s prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    Further Readings

    Baber, William R., Patricia L. Daniel, and Andrea A. Roberts. 2002. “Compensation

    to managers of charitable organizations: An empirical study of the role of

    accounting measures of program activities.” Accounting Review (77, 3, July), pp.

    679–693. Bowen Family Theory Questions

    The Comprehensive Report of the Special Committee on Financial Reporting.

    American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1994. Improving Business

    Reporting—A Customer Focus. New York: AICPA.

    Council of Better Business Bureaus (CBBB). 2001. Web site for the Philanthropic

    Advisory Service reports. Available at: www.bbb.org/pas/reports.

    Governmental Accounting Standards Board. 1990. Service Efforts and

    Accomplishments Reporting: Its Time Has Come—An Overview. Washington, DC:

    GASB.

    Guidestar. 2001. Web site that reports Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt

    from Income Tax, information for charities. Available at:

    http://www.guidestar.org.

    Houle, C. O. 1989. Governing Boards: Their Nature and Nurture. (Washington, DC:

    Jossey-Bass and National Center for Nonprofit Boards).

    Joos, Peter, and George A. Plesko. 2005. “Valuing loss firms.” Accounting Review

    (80, 3, July), pp. 847–870.

    Laswad, Fawzi, Richard Fisher, and Peter Oyelere. 2005. “Determinants of

    voluntary Internet financial reporting by local government authorities.” Journal of

    Accounting and Public Policy (24, 2, March/April), pp. 101–121.

    Parry, Robert W., Florence Sharp, Jannet Vreeland, and Wanda A. Wallace. 1994.

    “The role of service efforts and accomplishments reporting in total quality

    5.3-6

    5.3-7

     

     

    management: Implications for accountants.” Accounting Horizons (8, 2, June), pp.

    25–43.

    Peebles, Laura. 2001. “The right philanthropic vehicle.” Journal of Accountancy

    (July), pp. 22–27.

    Ripperger, Matt. 2001. “Analyst [A director with Warburg Dillon Read’s Healthcare

    Research Group] interview: Hospital management services.” Wall Street Journal

    Transcript (February 7), Document # LAQ901.

    Wallace, Wanda A. 2006. “Financial management in government entails evaluating

    nonprofits: Are you ready for the next natural disaster?” Journal of Government

    Financial Management (55, 1, Spring), pp. 44–57.

    Wallace, Wanda A. 2003. “Avoiding the downfall of windfalls.” Journal of

    Government Financial Management (52, 3, Fall), pp. 18–30.

    Wallace, Wanda A. 2001. “How accountable are charities for their performance?”

    Accounting Today (June 18–July 1), pp. 18, 20. Bowen Family Theory Questions

    Accounting deals with a system which is a human creation, designed to satisfy

    human needs, and which must therefore, above all, be useful. The accounting

    environment is prone to many influences of a nondeterministic nature,

    influences related not only to long-term legal, cultural and political traditions,

    but also to short-term movements of mass psychology… . The subject matter is

    of such diversity and changing complexity that attempts to make predictions in

    accounting are akin to the difficulties of predicting the conditions of turbulence

    inside a tornado or the problem of “forecasting” next month’s weather.

    In principle it is possible for meteorologists to predict the weather at noon in

    Chicago on January 1, 1981, just as it is possible in principle to predict an eclipse

    of the sun a thousand years hence. In practice, weather predictions (unlike

    astronomical predictions) are unreliable over the space of a month let alone a

    millennium. Accountants, like meteorologists, are also faced with a complex

    world of many interacting bodies. Nevertheless, they might be able to adopt the

    pure scientific method, and perhaps enjoy as much success with it as

    meteorologists, if—like—meteorologists—they only had to deal with the

    behavior of inhuman molecules. But in contrast, the accountant’s “molecules”

     

     

    think and feel, they have traditions and cultures, they are governed by laws, act

    sometimes rationally and often irrationally, and are susceptible to an enormous

    variety of psychological, social, economic, cultural, and political influences… .

    Accountancy … deals with problems

     

     

    PRINTED BY: 1stladyalix@email.phoenix.edu. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher’s prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    involving equity and balance and the resolution of conflict between different

    groups of human beings with widely varying interest and objectives.

    —Edward Stamp

    [Source: “Why Can Accounting Not Become a Science Like Physics?” ABACUS (Vol.

    17, No. 1, 1981), p. 21]

    5.3-7

    5.3-8

     

     

    PRINTED BY: 1stladyalix@email.phoenix.edu. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without publisher’s prior permission. Violators will be prosecuted.

    5.3-8

    5.4-1

  • attachment

    BowenFamilyTheoryandTherapyquestions.docx

    Bowen Family Theory and Therapy

    1.Consider Bowen’s notion that people seek out partners with identical levels of differentiation of self. Do you think this is true? Why might people marry partners at similar levels of differentiation? According to Bowen, Why would a mismatch fail?

     

    Bowen Family Theory and Therapy

    2.You should have completed or may be in the process of completing your Genogram, however, please discuss either Multigenerational Transmission Process, Emotional Cutoff, Sibling Position or Societal Emotional Process as it pertains to you and your family. Provide examples.