Chapter 10: Mandatory Minimum Staffing Ratios

Chapter 10: Mandatory Minimum Staffing Ratios

Chapter 10: Mandatory Minimum Staffing Ratios

Case Study

A nurse manager is attending a national convention and is attending a concurrent session on staffing ratios. Minimum staffing ratios are being discussed in the nurse manager’s own state. The nurse manager has a number of questions about staffing ratios that the session is covering. The nurse manager knows that evidence exists that increasing the number of RNs in the staffing mix leads to safer workplaces for nurses and higher quality of care for patients.

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

1. What are the three general approaches recommended by the American Nurses Association (2017) to maintain sufficient staffing?

2. Summarize the findings that are often cited as the seminal work in support of establishing minimum staffing ratio legislation at the federal or state level.

3. Analyze what proponents and critics say about whether mandatory minimum staffing ratios are needed.

  • attachment

    Chapter_10.pptx

    Chapter 10 Mandatory Minimum Staffing Ratios

     

    Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    RN Skill Mix

    Economics as the driving concern for changes

    Trend: reduction in RNs in staffing mix; replacement with less expensive personnel

    Research: number of RNs in staffing mix directly affecting quality of care and patient outcomes

    National movement to mandate minimum staffing ratios

    As of 2017, 14 states addressed nurse staffing in hospitals in law/regulations

    California is the only state that stipulates in law; regulations for required minimum nurse-to-patient ratios to be maintained at all times by unit

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Staffing Ratios and Patient Outcomes

    Research findings (see Table 10.1)

    Questions about cost-effectiveness of statewide mandatory nurse staffing ratios

    Greater RN skill mix and fewer cases of sepsis and failure to rescue

    Benchmark research

    Needleman et al. (2002)

    Aiken et al. (2002)

    Direct link between nurse-to-patient ratios and mortality from preventable complications

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Mandatory Minimum Staffing Ratios: Needed? #1

    ANA with concern related to effect of poor staffing on nurses’ health and safety and patient outcomes

    Proponents

    Absolutely essential for patient safety and outcomes

    Use of standardized ratios for consistent approach

    Critics

    Exponentially increased cost with no guarantee of quality improvement or positive outcomes

    AONE agrees and does not support mandated nurse staffing ratios

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Question #1

    Is the following statement true or false?

    Few states have enacted staffing laws.

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Answer to Question #1

    False

    As of 2017, 14 states addressed nurse staffing in hospitals in law/regulations.

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Mandatory Minimum Staffing Ratios: Needed? #2

    Evidence of benefits mixed, contradictory

    No accounting for education, experience, and skill level

    Risk of actual decline in staffing—used as a ceiling or absolute criteria without accounting for patient acuity or RN skill level

    Cost as the major deterrent—not financially attractive to hospitals

    Mandate for specific staffing ratios and current shortage leading to reduction in hospital services, increased emergency room diversions, increased unit closures, increased expenses

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Mandatory Minimum Staffing Ratios: Needed? #3

    Ohio Hospital Association: benefit of staffing ratios is mixed and sometimes contradictory

    Corbridge (2017): argues that mandating inflexible nurse staffing ratios or stringent meal and rest break requirements do not improve patient care or outcomes

    Silber et al (2016): better-staffed facilities had a formula for excellent value as well as better patient outcomes (see Box 10.2)

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    California Prototype #1

    First state to implement mandatory minimum staffing ratios

    Maximum number of patients an RN could be assigned to care for under any circumstances (see Table 10.2)

    Issues in determining appropriate ratios

    Lack of data about nurse staffing distribution

    Patient classification system (PCS) data problematic

    Unknown cost

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    California Prototype #2

    Recommendation: 1 nurse to every 6 patients in med/surg units

    Delays in implementation

    Problems with interpreting the meaning and intent of language related to “licensed nurses”

    Issues related to cutting nonlicensed staff

    Questions if adequate number of RNs available to meet ratios

    Emergency regulation in 2004; overturned in 2005

    Hospitals and nursing unions’ responses

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    California Prototype #3

    Struggle to implement

    Mandate effective 1/1/2004

    Larger hospitals versus smaller hospitals to meet mandate

    Need for legal clarification for “at all times” (i.e., breaks, lunches)

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Question #2

    Is the following statement true or false?

    California implemented mandatory minimum staffing ratios fairly quickly.

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Answer to Question #2

    False

    There were significant delays in implementing the California mandatory minimum staffing ratios.

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    California Prototype #4

    Improvement in RN staffing and patient outcomes?

    Reduction in number of patients per licensed nurse

    Increase in number of worked nursing hours per patient day in hospitals

    No significant impact on measures of nursing quality and patient safety indicators

    No increase in adverse outcomes despite increasing patient acuity

    Lower risk-adjusted mortality (Aiken, 2010)

    No improvement in quality of care (HC Pro, 2009)

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Similar Initiatives: Other States

    Minimum standards for licensed nursing in certified nursing homes but not in acute care hospitals

    Several attempts, but none enacted

    Adequate numbers requirement for Medicare-certified hospitals

    Many states actively pursuing minimum staffing ratio legislation

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Other Alternatives

    Pursuit of alternatives to improve nurse staffing without legislated minimum staffing ratios

    Lack of support for legislated minimum staffing ratios

    The Joint Commission

    ANA against fixed nurse–patient ratios; recommendation of three general approaches (see Box 10.3)

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Question #3

    Is the following statement true or false?

    The ANA supports legislation for fixed nurse–patient ratios.

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    Answer to Question #3

    False

    The ANA does not support fixed nurse–patient ratios but advocates for a workload system that takes into account the many variables that exist to ensure safe staffing.

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved

    End of Presentation

     

    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer • All Rights Reserved