Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

Description and feeling

  • attachment

    63D925CA-FD72-4B80-AAD4-A5CACF950399.jpeg
  • attachment

    Bringing-Them-Home-20-years-on-FINAL-SCREEN-1-Copy.pdf

    Bringing Them Home 20 years on: an action plan for healing

    Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healing Foundation

    Bringing Them Home 20 years on: an action plan for healing

     

     

    Executive summary 4

    Background 6

    The Stolen Generations 7

    The Bringing Them Home report 10

    Responding to Bringing Them Home 14

    Why action is needed now 19

    An action plan for making things right 26

    Action one: comprehensive response for Stolen Generations members 27

    Action two: healing intergenerational trauma 40

    Action three: creating an environment for change 45

    Appendix 1: key themes and recommendations from the Bringing Them Home report 50

    Bibliography 52

    Notes 54

    Contents

    We acknowledge Stolen Generations members across Australia, including those who have passed on, for their courage in sharing their stories and wisdom in the Bringing Them Home report.

    This report, written by Pat Anderson and Edward Tilton, was guided by the Healing Foundation’s Stolen Generations Reference Committee. The Committee’s efforts were central to ensuring that this report reflects the experience of Stolen Generations and for forming the critical recommendations to bring about change in Australia.

    We acknowledge and thank all other contributors who were consulted for this report.

    1

     

     

    …the past is very much with us today, in the continuing devastation of the lives of Indigenous Australians. That devastation cannot be addressed unless the whole community listens with an open heart and mind to the stories of what has happened in the past and, having listened and understood, commits itself to reconciliation. Extract from the 1997 Bringing Them Home report

    2

     

     

    On 26 May 1997 the landmark Bringing Them Home report was tabled in Federal Parliament. The report was the result of a national inquiry that investigated the forced removal of Indigenous children from their families. This marked a pivotal moment in the healing journey of many Stolen Generations members. It was the first time their stories—stories of being taken from their families—were acknowledged in such a way.

    It was also the first time it was formally reported that what governments did to these children was inhumane and the impact has been lifelong.

    Most Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been affected by the Stolen Generations. The resulting trauma has been passed down to children and grandchildren, contributing to many of the issues faced in Indigenous communities, including family violence, substance abuse and self harm.

    Two decades on and the majority of the Bringing Them Home recommendations have not yet been implemented. For many Stolen Generations members, this has created additional trauma and distress.

    Failure to act has caused a ripple effect to current generations. We are now seeing an increase in Aboriginal people in jails, suicide is on the rise and more children are being removed.

    Addressing the underlying trauma of these issues through healing is the only way to create meaningful and lasting change.

    Commemorative events, like the 20th anniversary of the Bringing Them Home report, are an important part of the healing process, for Stolen Generations members, their families and the broader community. In order to change, you have to remember.

    The anniversary presents an opportunity to reset—to secure sustainable support to help reduce the impact of trauma. This report makes three key recommendations:

    1 A comprehensive assessment of the contemporary and emerging needs of Stolen Generations members, including needs-based funding and a financial redress scheme.

    2 A national study into intergenerational trauma to ensure that there is real change for young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the future.

    3 An appropriate policy response that is based on the principles underlying the 1997 Bringing Them Home report.

    Executive summary

    While this report might primarily detail the response from government to the Bringing Them Home report, it is not a report to government about government. This is a report for everyone, and outlines as a whole how we can actively support healing for Stolen Generations and their descendants. There needs to be commitment to making change. We all have a responsibility to do this together. Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

    The price of not acting on the recommendations means an increased burden for Australia as a whole. It’s time for action. We need to address the unfinished business—for the sake of our Elders, our young ones, for our entire communities and all Australians.

    554

     

     

    In 1997, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission’s Bringing Them Home (BTH) report was made public. The report was a significant milestone for the Stolen Generations members, their families, and the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community. It was also important for Australia as a whole. In the testimonies it recorded and the recommendations it made, the Bringing Them Home report provided a basis for addressing the rights and needs of Stolen Generations members and for progressing reconciliation based on a genuine acknowledgement of Australia’s past.

    Despite progress in some areas, there has never been a collaborative and systematic attempt to address the recommendations the report made. Most have never been implemented.

    To coincide with the 20th anniversary of the release of the Bringing Them Home report in 2017, the Healing Foundation commissioned this review to revisit the principles and its recommendations of the report, and to examine their advancement in the contemporary policy landscape.1

    This review outlines a plan of action to meet the continuing and emerging needs and rights of Stolen Generations members and their families, based on the priorities of the Stolen Generations, the evidence of the effects of the failure to implement the Bringing Them Home recommendations, the report’s recommendations and underlying principles, namely:

    • self-determination

    • non-discrimination

    • cultural renewal

    • coherent policy base

    • provision of adequate resources.

    This review is intended to mark the start of a conversation led by Stolen Generations members to inform the continuing process of acknowledging and making reparation for the wrongs of the past.

    The forcible removal of children The effects of colonisation on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people of Australia have been catastrophic. The histories of colonisation are highly diverse, unfolding at different times and in locally and regionally specific ways. Nevertheless, the common experience for Indigenous people was one of devastation caused by introduced disease, frontier violence, dispossession from land and its resources, and the disruption and suppression of traditional cultures.

    Added to these factors was the forcible removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families. These children have become known as the Stolen Generations. The practice of removal became a systematic part of the policy of assimilation adopted by all Australian governments in the 20th century, and while the number of children forcibly removed under this policy is not known, the estimate provided by the work of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families was that:

    … between one in three and one in 10 Indigenous children were forcibly removed from their families and communities in the period from approximately 1910 until 1970. In certain regions and in certain periods the figure was undoubtedly much greater than one in 10. In that time not one Indigenous family has escaped the effects of forcible removal… Most families have been affected, in one or more generations, by the forcible removal of one or more children.2

    Children were moved to institutions run by churches and non-government organisations, adopted by non-Indigenous families, or placed with non-Aboriginal households to work as domestic servants and farm hands. Many children suffered very harsh, degrading treatment (including sexual abuse), limited or no contact with families, and were frequently indoctrinated to believe in the inferiority of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and culture.

    Background The Stolen Generations

    776

     

     

    The laws of those times are still impacting on our people today … it is time to finish this business

    The campaign for recognition Laws supporting the removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children on the basis of race were repealed across Australia by the 1970s. As self- determination replaced assimilation as the dominant policy approach, the Stolen Generations and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander organisations began to force a re-appraisal of the practice of forcible removal. In 1995 this led to the Australian Government asking the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission to carry out a national inquiry to:

    • examine the past laws, practices and policies of forcible separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families and their effects

    • identify what should be done in response, including any changes in current laws, practices and policies with a focus on locating and reunifying families

    • examine the justification for any compensation for those affected by the forcible separations

    • look at then current laws, policies and practices affecting the placement and care of Indigenous children.

    8

     

     

    The Inquiry held extensive consultations across Australia, taking evidence from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, government and church representatives, foster and adoptive parents, health professionals, academics, and police, as well as receiving hundreds of written submissions. The final report of the Inquiry was tabled in the Australian Parliament on 26 May 1997.

    The report extensively documented the experience of the Stolen Generations, finding that a deliberate policy of assimilation underlay the removal process and that:

    the forcible removal of Indigenous children was a gross violation of their human rights. It … was an act of genocide contrary to the Convention on Genocide ratified by Australia in 1949.3

    It concluded that those affected had a right to reparations, including an acknowledgment of the truth and an apology; guarantees these human rights would not be breached again; the return of what had been lost where possible; rehabilitation; and compensation. The report also made findings about the contemporary removal of children from their families.

    Principles The Bringing Them Home report proposed a set of key principles to underlie government responses to those affected by the forcible removal of children4:

    1 Self-determination – the right of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Stolen Generations members and their families to exercise autonomy in their own affairs and make their own decisions.

    2. Non-discrimination – the right to be free of racial discrimination, and to be able to access services which are appropriate to their particular needs.

    3. Cultural renewal – the right to participate in cultural activities, recognising the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and the need to repair the damaged family and cultural ties resulting from the removal of children.

    4. A coherent policy base – the need for an agreed set of services to begin the process of healing and redress, with agreed objectives and goals.

    5. Adequate resources – appropriate funding to enable services to address the diverse effects of removal on individuals, families and communities.

    The Bringing Them Home report

    Recommendations Stemming from its findings and founded on those principles, the report made 54 recommendations:

    • acknowledgment and formal apology with all parliaments, police forces and churches to acknowledge, apologise and make reparation for past wrongs

    • reparation for people who were forcibly removed including monetary compensation through a national compensation fund

    • records, family tracing and reunion, including funding community-based Link-Up services to help families reconnect, and the establishment of records taskforces

    • rehabilitation for survivors of forcible removal, including local healing and wellbeing approaches

    • education and training, including a National Sorry Day and the inclusion of compulsory modules on the Stolen Generations in school curricula

    • guarantees against repetition, including the implementation of self- determination approaches to the well-being of Indigenous children and young people

    • addressing contemporary separation, with national standards legislation to ensure compliance with the Indigenous Child Placement Principle

    • a national process for coordination and monitoring the implementation of the recommendations.

    111110

     

     

    Finally the truth was out there

     

     

    The Australian Government response, 1997 – 2007 Following the tabling of the report, the immediate response of the Australian Government of the day was to reject many of the key principles and recommendations linked to them, in particular the need for a formal apology and for reparations. However, the government did provide funding ($63 million over four years) including for regional social and emotional wellbeing centres, counselling positions, Link-Up services, culture and language maintenance programs, and family support and parenting programs.5 Much of this funding was made permanent in 2001-2002, initially as part of the Department of Health’s budget and more recently within the Indigenous Advancement Strategy under the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

    While the Bringing Them Home recommendations for a national process for monitoring implementation were not agreed to, between 2000 and 2007 there were a number of attempts to evaluate the government response to the report. The results of these inquiries were generally highly critical, finding that the Australian Government’s response in particular had been under-funded, badly directed, poorly coordinated, and insufficiently targeted to the needs of the Stolen Generations.6 In 2007, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner reflected on the decade since the report was made public:

    For Aboriginal people, the years since the Bringing Them Home report have been filled with great hope as well as lost opportunities. While there have been positive developments and initiatives, many opportunities for governments to work with our communities and advance the goal of national reconciliation have been lost. Ten years on, the recommendations of the Bringing Them Home report still stand as the starting point for a national reconciliation process.7

    Evaluation of Bringing Them Home and Indigenous Mental Health Programs (2007)

    The Office for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health within the then Department of Health and Ageing commissioned Urbis Keys Young to carry out an evaluation of the implementation of the Link-Up program, the Bringing Them Home counsellors program, the Social and Emotional Wellbeing Regional Centre Program, and the funding of mental health service delivery projects in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations. Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

    Responding to Bringing Them Home

    It found that the funded organisations (Link-Ups, ACCHOs and others) had delivered a number of important achievements but faced a number of limitations, including a lack of focus on first generation Stolen Generations survivors, variable skills and qualifications of staff, a lack of consistency in service delivery, and limited geographical coverage. More broadly it found that:

    The Government’s response to the Bringing Them Home report has been insufficiently documented, poorly coordinated and insufficiently targeted to meet the needs of the Stolen Generations, as concluded by reports examining this issue. This is consistent with the findings of this evaluation. There has been insufficient prioritisation of the needs of first generation Stolen Generations members.8

    The Apology (2008) and beyond Under a new Australian Government, the Apology to Australia’s Indigenous Peoples was passed by the Australian Parliament on 13 February 2008. As well as delivering on one of Bringing Them Home’s central, unfulfilled recommendations, the Apology also marked a shift in the policy response back towards some of its underlying principles. It also led to the establishment of the Healing Foundation. However, the Australian Government continued to oppose establishing national processes for compensation, and continued a response based on funding of services, though once again these were often aimed at the broader Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community, rather than the Stolen Generations in particular.

    In the absence of any formal monitoring process, two non-government agencies have recently carried out their own assessment of the response to the Bringing Them Home report.9 These found very limited implementation of the recommendations: less than one in 10 were identified as having been fully implemented.

    The Bringing Them Home report created some positive change: it provided the opportunity for Stolen Generations members to put their stories on the public record; it led to the Apology; it foreshadowed a greater focus on social and emotional wellbeing in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities; and it led to increased support for Link-Up services and the establishment of the Healing Foundation.

    However, the great majority of its recommendations have yet to be implemented, and the principles that underlay them are yet to form a coherent basis for a national response to the historical trauma suffered by the Stolen Generations. For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australia, Bringing Them Home remains unfinished business. Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

    151514

     

     

    The work still hasn’t been done, it’s unfinished business

     

     

    Why action is needed now

    The number of people affected It’s difficult to say exactly how many children were taken from their families or how many Stolen Generations members are still alive today. The Bringing Them Home report estimated that a minimum of one in 10 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were forcibly removed from their families and communities in the period up to 1970. This estimate is consistent with the most recent evidence available, which found that 12 per cent of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged over 45 years in 2008 had personally been removed from their family by ‘welfare, as part of government policy or taken away to a mission’.10 Applying this proportion to the latest publicly available figures on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population suggests around 14,700 Stolen Generations members.11 While this number is falling as older members pass away, a proportion of the seven per cent of people aged 15 to 44 in 2008 who reported being taken away would also be Stolen Generations. Therefore, when we start to consider the wider impact, a realistic estimate for the number of Stolen Generations members would be 15,000 people, at minimum.

    A further 38 per cent of people surveyed in 2008 reported having immediate family who had been removed. This means an additional 160,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people directly affected by the policies of forcible removal.12 These figures are rough estimates, but give a broad picture of the scale of the issue.

    Continuing effects on the Stolen Generations The failure to implement the recommendations of the Bringing Them Home report is reflected in a wide range of negative outcomes.

    A recent study examined the health and wellbeing status of those who had been removed themselves and those who had parents, grandparents/great- grandparents or siblings who had been removed. This group, the Stolen Generations and their immediate family and descendants:

    … are around 50 per cent more likely to have been charged by police, 30 per cent less likely to report being in good health, 15 per cent more likely to consume alcohol at risky levels and 10 per cent less likely to be employed.13

    Let the healing begin Today is an historic day.

    It’s the day our leaders—across the political spectrum—have chosen dignity, hope and respect as the guiding principles for the relationship with our first nations’ peoples.

    Through one direct act, Parliament has acknowledged the existence and the impacts of the past policies and practices of forcibly removing Indigenous children from their families.

    And by doing so, has paid respect to the Stolen Generations. For their suffering and their loss. For their resilience. And ultimately, for their dignity. Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

    …The introductory words of the 1997 Bringing Them Home report remind us of this. It reads:

    …the past is very much with us today, in the continuing devastation of the lives of Indigenous Australians. That devastation cannot be addressed unless the whole community listens with an open heart and mind to the stories of what has happened in the past and, having listened and understood, commits itself to reconciliation.

    By acknowledging and paying respect, Parliament has now laid the foundations for healing to take place and for a reconciled Australia in which everyone belongs.

    For today is not just about the Stolen Generations—it is about every Australian.

    Today’s actions enable every single one of us to move forward together— with joint aspirations and a national story that contains a shared past and future.

    Formal Response on behalf of the Stolen Generations to the Parliament of Australia’s National Apology by Tom Calma, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner, 13 February 2008.

    Tom Calma

    1918 19

     

     

    The comparison data utilised to undertake this research was other Indigenous people across Australia. Given that we already know Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have poorer health and social outcomes than the general Australian population this indicates extreme vulnerability for Stolen Generations and their descendants.

    On an individual level, there is the personal cost to those who came forward to the Inquiry, often at the risk of being re-traumatised through sharing and retelling their stories. They took this risk on the trust that it would lead to significant change. Many of these people ended their lives without that trust being repaid.

    There have also been ongoing health and social effects for the Stolen Generations and their families. They have significantly poorer physical health and over double the rates of mental illness and alcohol abuse compared to that suffered by those Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who were not removed. They have also, on average, received a poorer education and are more likely to be unemployed.14

    The educational and economic consequences of forcible removal are important to note, given the ideology holding that the removal of children was so that they could get an education and ‘get ahead’ in mainstream society. The effects have clearly been the opposite: on average, the Stolen Generations have received a poorer education and are more likely to be unemployed than those Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who were not removed.

    The breakdown of family and social structures caused by removal decimated communities. It deeply impacted Stolen Generations members. They did not know where to go to seek support for anything; they no longer belonged to a community, held no memories of belonging to one and were not able to draw on the strengths of a community to help them. This disempowered Stolen Generations members in being able to take action and seek assistance resulting in many members feeling isolated and distressed. There has also been a considerable community impact in terms of trauma experienced by those that were left behind with many of their parents, grandparents and family members never recovering from the distress of losing their children.

    In all of the focus on healing there has been extremely limited focus on healing the relationship between Stolen Generations and their communities and this has fed lateral violence resulting in increasing isolation.

    Intergenerational trauma The trauma that people suffered removed their right to parent freely and receive support to care safely for their children.

    Many people suffered by not being able to show love to their families and lost the enjoyment of accepting the love of their children. They lost the right to love their children and were frightened to accept love. Many of them suffered in silence and sacrificed their own wellbeing to keep their families together. Sometimes they stayed in more difficult circumstances, such as marriages, where there was violence, as they could not tolerate their families being broken up again, their children growing up without a mother and a father. Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

    This also meant that many did not seek support for any of their problems, including their own mental health for fear of being judged unfit parents and their children being taken. Men often missed out on being fathers as they sought to use any means to dull the pain such as alcohol use.

    As well as the negative effects felt by Stolen Generations members, the failure to address the trauma created through forced removal policies has led to widespread problems throughout the whole Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community.

    The increasing levels of contemporary child removal from Aboriginal families was an issue that the Bringing Them Home report canvassed in depth. Numerous participants acknowledged that while the intent of child removal practices today is different to that experienced by the Stolen Generations, the effect is potentially the same: a loss of identity and the exacerbation of intergenerational trauma. The failure to implement the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Placement Principles described at length in the Bringing Them Home recommendations was a particular concern for the organisations consulted in the development of this report.

    The Bringing Them Home report found that in 1993 two per cent of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children (nationally) were in care, almost seven and a half times the rate for non-Indigenous children (page 372). The latest figures (for 2015) show a worsening situation: over five per cent of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are in care, almost 10 times the rate for non-Indigenous children (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW 2016). Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

    212120

     

     

    It is well-established that adverse experiences in childhood can have lifelong effects, including mental ill health, physical illness, poor educational and employment outcomes, addiction, relationship difficulties, and increased contact with the criminal justice system.15 What is emerging now is the evidence that such traumatic experiences:

    can be transferred from the first generation of survivors that have experienced (or witnessed) it directly in the past to the second and further generations of descendants of the survivors … [this] intergenerational trauma … is defined as the subjective experiencing and remembering of events in the mind of an individual or the life of a community, passed from adults to children in cyclic processes as ‘cumulative emotional and psychological wounding.16

    Evidence for intergenerational trauma includes the testimonies and experience of the Stolen Generations themselves, particularly as recorded in the Bringing Them Home report which has many heart-rending reflections on the lasting effects of trauma in their own families’ lives. Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

    There are also the differential health and social outcomes experienced by the Stolen Generations and their descendants: those who have been removed themselves or whose immediate family were removed are significantly more likely to be in contact with the police, have alcohol and gambling problems, have poorer mental health and social skills or have children with increased risks of emotional and behavioural difficulties.17

    There is also powerful evidence for the effects of intergenerational trauma in a number of key indicators of wellbeing in contemporary Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander life that are strongly linked to the experience of unresolved intergenerational trauma, such as the high and rising rates of the contemporary removal of children from their families, the incarceration of young people, and family violence.

    Mothers still live in fear that their children are going to be taken from them

    22

     

     

    Truth and healing Underpinning all of the policies that led to the forced removal of Indigenous children was a subscription to racism, including institutional racism. Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

    The origin of the trauma has been the dispossession, exclusion and discrimination suffered by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, and experienced in particular by the Stolen Generations through being taken from their families and communities. Added to this is the ongoing experience of racism. This can be on a personal level (surveys show that the experience of racism is almost universally reported amongst Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people18) or on a systemic level through practices and policies which disadvantage and marginalise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people being structured into how institutions operate.19 There is a strong association between these experiences of racism and poor mental health and drug use. For people bearing a burden of trauma, it is also re-traumatising and can become a barrier to healing.

    Racism can be countered by truth-telling. This is one of the most important outcomes of what has occurred from the Bringing Them Home report for Stolen Generations survivors. However, the legacy of these times continues to play out within our society and we still battle the continuous impact of institutional racism in our efforts to get the right policies to lead and develop change for Stolen Generations members and their families.

    Bringing Them Home: a missed opportunity By documenting a part of Australia’s history that was previously ignored, the Bringing Them Home report provided a basis for genuine reconciliation, and for addressing issues of identity, trust and the experience of racism that continue to strongly affect the relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australia today.

    The report made recommendations for addressing the needs of Stolen Generations members and their families, as well as other Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people regarding language; culture and history; mental health; the contemporary removal of children; and self-determination. It charted a way forward based on justice, on the healing of past hurts, and of breaking the cycle of intergenerational trauma.

    There is no way of knowing what the contemporary Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander world would look like had there been a concerted effort to implement the Bringing Them Home vision for the future. But it is clear that the failure to properly implement this vision represents a significantly missed opportunity to address trauma in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and to provide a basis for genuine reconciliation in Australia. Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

    Florence Onus is a descendant of the Birri-Gubba and Kairi/Bidjara clans of north-east Queensland.

    She is the fourth generation of women from her family to be forcibly removed from land, culture and family.

    “My grandmother and my mother were both trained and sent out as domestic servants on properties. They weren’t allowed to speak their native language or practice cultural ceremonies, or they would be severely punished,” Florence said.

    “And then I became part of the Stolen Generations when I was removed from my family to be raised in a white foster home.”

    Her two older sisters were sent to Rockhampton to live with nuns, while Florence and her two other siblings went to Townsville foster homes. There, Florence spent most of her childhood.

    “I embarked on my healing journey when at 21 my mother attempted suicide and I became her full time carer and together we began the journey of healing.”

    “It wasn’t until I started doing my own research and had access to policies that I truly realised that my mother was suffering from the impacts of intergenerational trauma.”

    Florence has four adult daughters and she is a grandmother. She is passionate about breaking the cycle of trauma through healing, education, cultural identity and spiritual nurturing.

    Florence is an educator and an advocate for social justice. Her maternal grandfather died in custody in the early 60s following his arrest as an agitator.

    Florence has carried on his fight for social justice, with a particular focus on the impact of Black Deaths in Custody and Stolen Generation issues. Stolen Generation in Aboriginal and Toress Islander

    “There needs to be an increase in healing resources for the Stolen Generations and our families to heal from the trauma, pain and suffering that we’re still dealing with today,” she said.

  • attachment

    Bringing-Them-Home-20-years-on-FINAL-SCREEN-1-Copy.pdf