Mentoring Coaching Consulting and Counseling

Mentoring Coaching Consulting and Counseling

Mentoring Coaching Consulting and Counseling

Compare and contrast mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling in 1,000-1,250 words, do the following:

  1. Construct an example or case study (scenario about an individual with pertinent background information and issues being experience) to illustrate when each, mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling, would be used the most effectively.
  2. Define executive coaching in your own words. Use literature to support your definition.

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

Use three to five scholarly resources to support your findings.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

  • attachment

    Rubric_Print_Format1.xlsx

    Rubic_Print_Format

    Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
    PSY-612 PSY-612-O500 Mentoring, Coaching, Consulting and Counseling 180.0
    Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
    Content 70.0%
    Construct an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling, would be used the most effectively. 35.0% Construction of an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling would be used most effectively is missing. Construction of an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling would be used most effectively is vague or inconsistent. Construction of an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling would be used most effectively is present and clear. Construction of an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling would be used most effectively is clear and makes some connection to research. Construction of an example to illustrate when each; mentoring, coaching, consulting, and counseling would be used most effectively is clear, concise and makes connections to current research.
    Define executive coaching in your own words. 35.0% Definition of executive coaching, in student’s own words, is missing. Definition of executive coaching, in student’s own words, is vague or inconsistent. Definition of executive coaching, in student’s own words, is present and clear. Definition of executive coaching, in student’s own words, is clear and makes some connection to research. Definition of executive coaching, in student’s own words, is clear, concise and makes connections to current research.
    Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
    Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
    Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
    Format 10.0%
    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
    Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
    Total Weightage 100%