Literature Evaluation Nursing Project

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. The ability to articulate research data and summarize relevant content supports the student’s ability to further develop and synthesize the assignments that constitute the components of the capstone project.

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

For this assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the “Literature Evaluation Table,” determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (within the last 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Literature Evaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences):

Criteria	Article 1	Article 2	Article 3	Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
Article Title and Year Published
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
Purposes/Aim of Study
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
Setting/Sample
Methods: Intervention/Instruments
Analysis
Key Findings
Recommendations
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

Criteria	Article 5	Article 6	Article 7	Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
Article Title and Year Published
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
Purposes/Aim of Study
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
Setting/Sample
Methods: Intervention/Instruments
Analysis
Key Findings
Recommendations
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

RUBRICES: Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Key findings section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Recommendations section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.