Assessment and Diagnosis Assignment Paper

Assessment and Diagnosis Assignment Paper

Assessment and Diagnosis Assignment Paper

Write a 750-1,000-word paper that addresses the following:

please include an introduction and conclusion

Please use the attached template

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

· A definition of screening, assessment, and treatment plan

· What is the assessment process for identifying addictive disorders?

· What considerations must be made for choosing an appropriate assessment tool?

· A general overview of the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM.

· A discussion about the potential problems that can arise when a counselor relies solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning.

· Include at least two examples of commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools.

· Discuss the need for crisis management when working with a client.

· Include a minimum of two scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.

When writing the paper, consider using the following level-one APA headings to help organize the content:

· Definitions

· Assessment Process

· Considerations

· General Overview of Criteria

· Potential Problems

· Examples

· Crisis Management

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide

*****I want to give you some tips for how to score well on this assignment.*************************

· Review the rubric!

o If you want to get points for a certain area of your paper, look at the rubric. It tells you how to make this happen

o One common error is that people do not include an Intro or Conclusion, and so it is hard for me to rationalize that they have a strong Thesis Statement & Development score. Be thorough and show strong attention to detail. If it is not present = 0.

o Address all the content areas identified in the guidelines for the assignment.

o Use an appropriate structure for your paper.

o FIND 2 PEER-REVIEWED SOURCES

§ Not web pages. Scholarly = Peer-Reviewed / Published

§ Aim to use current resources as well. Sometimes dated information leads people to state things as fact when they really are not viewed this way in the present.

o APA is King in the counseling field

§ All written submissions you will do in this field assume you understand APA format.

§ If you are not sure how to do this, consult the APA Manual and do a full read through for a few hours. This will earn you so many points in the future.

§ Find reputable web resources for specific formatting questions if you feel stuck.

§ Also- check out: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.htmlThis page has lots of good resources

The rubrics for each assignment are fully utilized in my courses, and I have high expectations for my graduate students in relation to writing and articulating your message through your assignments.

  • attachment

    TEMPLATE-Week2-AssessmentandDiagnosis1.docx

    ASSESSMENT & DIAGNOSIS 1

    4

    ASSESSMENT & DIAGNOSIS

    Assessment & Diagnosis

    NAME

    Grand Canyon University

    PCN-501: Introduction to Addictions &

    Substance Use Disorders

    DATE

     

    Assessment and Diagnosis

    Introduction

    [Type a comprehensive introduction paragraph. Finish with thesis statement. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.] Assessment and Diagnosis Assignment Paper

    Defining Clinical Terms

    [Essay expertly describes screening, assessment, and treatment, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.]

    The Assessment Process

    [Essay expertly discusses the assessment process for assessing and diagnosing clients for addictive disorders, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.]

    Considerations for Assessment Selection

    [Essay expertly describes the considerations when selecting an appropriate assessment tool, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.] Assessment and Diagnosis Assignment Paper

    Overview of DSM-5 Criteria

    [Essay expertly discusses the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.]

    Limitations in DSM-Only Treatment Planning

    [Essay expertly discusses the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.] Assessment and Diagnosis Assignment Paper

    Addiction Treatment: Examples of Common Assessment Tools

    [Essay expertly discusses at least two examples commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.]

    Crisis Management in Addiction Treatment

    [Essay expertly describes the need for crisis management when working with a client, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.]

    Conclusion

    [Conclude the paper and all topics. Write in paragraph format and connect your content from the other sections back to the completed purpose of the paper.]

     

    References

    Use journal articles to complete this list of references. There is no specific target for number of references, but you should have scholarly support for every section of this writing assignment. Assessment and Diagnosis Assignment Paper

    The textbook does not count as one, but you can use it to support your responses in the above research paper. The same rule applies to web-resources, videos, psychological opinion articles designed for lay audiences etc. You may use them, but make sure to have three resources of high scholarship value.

    Author, I. N. (Year). Title of the article. Title of the Journal or Periodical, volume(Issue), pp-pp.

    Last, F. M. (Year Published) Book. City, State: Publisher.

  • attachment

    Rubric_Print_Format1.xlsx

    Rubic_Print_Format

    Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
    CNL-501 CNL-501-O502 Assessment and Diagnosis (Obj. 2.1 and 2.2) 100.0
    Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
    Content 70.0%
    Define screening, assessment, and treatment 10.0% Essay omits or incompletely describes screening, assessment, and treatment.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately describes screening, assessment, and treatment, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay adequately describes screening, assessment, and treatment, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay clearly describes screening, assessment, and treatment, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay expertly describes screening, assessment, and treatment, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
    Assessment process for identifying addictive disorders 10.0% Essay omits or incompletely discusses the assessment process for assessing and diagnosing clients for addictive disorders.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately discusses the assessment process for assessing and diagnosing clients for addictive disorders, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay adequately discusses the assessment process for assessing and diagnosing clients for addictive disorders, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay clearly discusses the assessment process for assessing and diagnosing clients for addictive disorders, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay expertly discusses the assessment process for assessing and diagnosing clients for addictive disorders, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
    Considerations for selecting an appropriate assessment tool 10.0% Essay omits or incompletely describes the considerations when selecting an appropriate assessment tool.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately describes the considerations when selecting an appropriate assessment tool, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay adequately describes the considerations when selecting an appropriate assessment tool, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay clearly describes the considerations when selecting an appropriate assessment tool, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay expertly describes the considerations when selecting an appropriate assessment tool, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
    General overview of the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM 10.0% Essay omits or incompletely discusses the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately discusses the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay adequately discusses the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay clearly discusses the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay expertly discusses the substance use disorder criteria according to the DSM, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
    Discuss the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning 10.0% Essay omits or incompletely discusses the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately discusses the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay adequately discusses the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay clearly discusses the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay expertly discusses the potential problems that can arise when relying solely on the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM for treatment planning, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
    At least two examples of commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools 10.0% Essay omits or incompletely discusses at least two examples commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately discusses at least two examples commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay adequately discusses at least two examples commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay clearly discusses at least two examples commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay expertly discusses at least two examples commonly used substance use disorder assessment tools, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
    The need for crisis management when working with a client 10.0% Essay omits or incompletely describes the need for crisis management when working with a client.Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Essay inadequately describes the need for crisis management when working with a client, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Essay adequately describes the need for crisis management when working with a client, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Essay clearly describes the need for crisis management when working with a client, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic. Essay expertly describes the need for crisis management when working with a client, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
    Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
    Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive, reflective of the arguments, and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
    Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
    Format 10.0%
    Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
    Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
    Total Weightage 100%