Early Childhood Education-Cognitive Development
Early Childhood Education-Cognitive Development
Using 3-5 scholarly resources, write a 500-750-word essay that includes:
- Description of Piaget’s assumptions with key terms.
- Description Vygotsky’s assumptions with key terms.
- Compare and contrast Piaget’s assumptions and Vygotsky’s assumptions.
- Give an example from Piaget of how cognitive development affects learning and ability in the early childhood classroom.
- Give an example from Vygotsky of how cognitive development affects learning and ability in the early childhood classroom.
ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Please prepare this assignment according APA style, include in-cite citations, references, and thesis. Early Childhood Education-Cognitive Development
Assignment uses a rubric
Cognitive Development-Rubrics
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% |
3 Satisfactory 75.00% |
4 Good 85.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.0 %Content | ||||||
15.0 %Description of Piaget’s Assumptions | Description of Piaget’s assumptions is not given. | Description of Piaget’s assumptions is vague and key terms are missing. | Description of Piaget’s assumptions is clearly given and key terms are described. | Description of Piaget’s assumptions is detailed and key terms are described in detail. | Description of Piaget’s assumptions is comprehensive and insightful and key terms are described in detail. | |
15.0 %Description Vygotsky’s Assumptions | Description of Vygotsky’s assumptions is not given. | Description of Vygotsky’s assumptions is vague and key terms are missing. | Description of Vygotsky’s assumptions is clearly given and key terms are described. | Description of Vygotsky’s assumptions is detailed and key terms are described in detail. | Description of Vygotsky’s assumptions is comprehensive and insightful and key terms are described in detail. | |
15.0 %Comparison of the Assumptions | Comparison of the assumptions is not given. | Comparison of the assumptions is vague. | Comparison of the assumptions is clearly given. | Comparison of the assumptions is detailed. | Comparison of the assumptions is comprehensive and insightful. | |
20.0 %Example from Piaget | Example from Piaget is not given. | Example from Piaget is not relevant to how cognitive development affects learning and ability in the early childhood classroom. | Example from Piaget is relevant to how cognitive development affects learning and ability in the early childhood classroom. | Example from Piaget is relevant and detailed as to how cognitive development affects learning and ability in the early childhood classroom. | Example from Piaget is comprehensive and insightful as to how cognitive development affects learning and ability in the early childhood classroom. | |
20.0 %Example from Vygotsky | Example from Vygotsky is not given. | Example from Vygotsky is not relevant to how cognitive development affects learning and ability in the early childhood classroom. | Example from Vygotsky is relevant to how cognitive development affects learning and ability in the early childhood classroom. | Example from Vygotsky is relevant and detailed as to how cognitive development affects learning and ability in the early childhood classroom. | Example from Vygotsky is comprehensive and insightful as to how cognitive development affects learning and ability in the early childhood classroom. | |
10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions | Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. | There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. | |
10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct, but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
5.0 %Format | ||||||
2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | GCU template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | GCU template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | GCU template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | GCU template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |
3.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) | No reference page is included. No citations are used. | Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. | Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. | Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct. | In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. | |
100 %Total Weightage |