Case Analysis – Integrating Theoretical Orientations
Case Analysis – Integrating Theoretical Orientations
Prior to beginning this assignment, read the PSY650 Week Two Treatment Plan ,
Case 16: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Gorenstein and Comer (2014), and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders in Hamblin and Gross (2012).
ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Assess the evidence-based practices implemented in this case study by addressing the following issues:
- Explain the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Remoc and the four interventions utilized in the case.
- Consider Dr. Remoc’s utilization of two theoretical frameworks to guide her treatment plan. Assess the efficacy of integrating two orientations based on the information presented in the case study. Describe some potential problems with prescribing medication as the only treatment option for children with ADHD.
- Identify tasks and positive reinforcements that might be included in Billy’s token economy chart given the behavior issues described in the case. (There are articles in the recommended resources that may assist you in this portion of the assignment.)
- Evaluate the effectiveness of the four treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Remoc and support your statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles
- Recommend three additional treatment interventions that would be appropriate in this case. Use information from the Hamblin and Gross “Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders” chapter to help support your recommendations. Justify your selections with information from the case.
The Case Analysis
- Must be 4 to 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style
- Must include a separate title page with the following:
- Title of paper
- Student’s name
- Course name and number
- Instructor’s name
- Date submitted
- Must use at least two peer-reviewed sources
- Must document all sources in APA style
- Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style
Gorenstein, E. E., & Comer, R. J. (2015). Case studies in abnormal psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers. Retrieved from https://redshelf.com
- The full-text version of this e-book is available through your online classroom
- Case 16: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Hamblin, R. J., & Gross, A. M. (2012). Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorders. In P. Sturmey & M. Hersen (Series Eds.), Handbook of evidence-based practice in clinical psychology: Vol. 1. Child and adolescent disorders [E-book] (pp. 243-266). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons
-
PSY650WeekTwoTreatmentPlan-21.pdf
PSY650 Week Two Treatment Plan
Behaviorally Defined Symptoms: Billy exhibits both inattention (e.g., short attention span,
difficulty sustaining attention on a consistent basis, noncompliance with instructions, easily
distracted by external stimuli) and hyperactivity-impulsivity (e.g., high energy level, difficulty
remaining seated, excessive motor activity, difficulty waiting his turn, blurting out answers in
class, poor social skills). Billy’s symptoms were apparent before the age of 12, and occurred at
home and in school.
Diagnostic Impression: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Combined Presentation
Long-Term Goal: Demonstrate marked improvement in impulse control.
Short-Term Goal 1: Discontinue taking stimulant medication and manage symptoms with
behavior modification techniques.
Intervention 1: Billy’s psychiatrist will monitor the effectiveness of the medication and
side effects every four weeks.
Intervention 2: Billy’s parents will attend six individualized “Parental Training”
sessions and apply newly learned behavioral modification techniques in the home.
Intervention 3: Billy will attend six “Social Skills” trainings to learn skills such as
cooperation, speaking calmly, and making polite requests.
Intervention 4: Billy’s teachers will implement a “Token Economy” where he obtains
tangible rewards in response to desired behaviors.
For additional information regarding Billy’s case history and the outcome of the treatment
interventions, please see Dr. Remoc’s session notes under Case 16 in Gorenstein and Comer’s
(2015), Case Studies in Abnormal Psychology.
-
Handbook_of_Evidence-Based_Practice_in_Clinical_Ps…_—-_Pg_267–290.pdf
10
Attention-Deficit/
Hyperactivity Disorders
REBECCA J. HAMBLIN AND ALAN M. GROSS
OVERVIEW
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
is one of the most well-studied child psycho-
pathologies, and a tremendous amount of
research has been published related to its
etiology, primary problems and impact,
demographic and contextual variability, and
treatment methods. The label has also received
heavy criticism as being an artificial U.S.
construct for labeling normally exuberant
children; however, early clinical descriptions
of attention impairments date to 1798 (Barkley,
2006; Palmer & Finger, 2001). Attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms are
reported to occur in all countries in which
ADHD has been studied (Polanczyk, de Lima,
Horta, Biederman, & Rohde, 2007). Despite
early conceptualization of the disorder as
resulting from poor character or wayward
parenting, ADHD is now seen as a neuro-
logically based disorder (Barkley, 2006).
ADHD is one of the most common dis-
orders of childhood, affecting an estimated
3% to 5% of children in the United States,
and is the most common reason for clinical
referral of children to psychiatric clinics
(American Psychiatric Association, 2000).
Children with ADHD display symptoms of
inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity
across multiple situations beginning at an
early age. The frequency of these behaviors
is out of bounds with respect to normal
development, and symptoms cause significant
impairments in family and peer relationships,
academic functioning, and emotional well-
being (Barkley, 2006).
This chapter will provide an overview of the
core symptoms and current diagnostic features
of the disorder, describe its prevalence and
epidemiology, impairments to daily life,
comorbid disorders, and long-term outcomes.
The next sections will describe various
psychosocial treatments that have been
empirically explored, and will review the most
current research on treatment efficacy. The
chapter concludes with a summary and list of
evidence-based treatments for ADHD.
CORE SYMPTOMS
Inattention
Relative to children without ADHD, those
with the disorder have difficulty maintaining
attention or vigilance in responding to envir-
onmental demands. That is, they have trouble
sustaining effort in tasks, particularly for
activities that are tedious, difficult, or with
little intrinsic appeal (Barkley, 2006). In the
classroom setting, impairment in attention and
task vigilance may be evident in inability to
c10 21 April 2012; 9:57:7
243 Hersen, M., & Sturmey, P. (2012). Handbook of evidence-based practice in clinical psychology, child and adolescent disorders. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com Created from ashford-ebooks on 2019-11-03 14:16:24.
C op
yr ig
ht ©
2 01
2. J
oh n
W ile
y &
S on
s, In
co rp
or at
ed . A
ll rig
ht s
re se
rv ed
.
complete independent assignments or listen
to class instruction. In unstructured settings,
inattention may be apparent in frequent shifts
between play activities. Parents and teachers
report that these children have difficulty
focusing, are often forgetful, lose things, fre-
quently daydream, fail to complete chores and
schoolwork, and require more redirection
and supervision than others the same age.
Children with high levels of inattentive
symptoms in the absence of hyperactive or
impulsive symptoms may also have a different
kind of attention problem marked by sluggish
cognitive processing and deficiency in select-
ive attention (Barkley, 2003). Case Analysis – Integrating Theoretical Orientations
Hyperactivity and Impulsivity
Hyperactivity and impulsivity almost always
co-occur and are therefore considered a single
dimension of ADHD. The hyperactive-
impulsive dimension of the disorder is often
conceptualized as behavioral disinhibition.
Hyperactivity is displayed in fidgeting, rest-
lessness, loud and excessive talking, and
excessive levels of motor activity. Impulsive
behaviors include interrupting or intruding on
others, difficulty waiting and taking turns, and
blurting out without thinking. Children
and adolescents with hyperactive-impulsive
features are described by caregivers as reck-
less, irresponsible, rude, immature, squirmy,
and on the go (APA, 2000; Barkley, 2006).
Diagnostic Criteria and Subtypes
Diagnostic criteria for ADHD are defined by
theDiagnostic and StatisticalManual ofMental
Disorders, FourthEdition, Text Revision (DSM-
IV-TR) as presence of several symptoms in
inattention, hyperactivity-impulsivity, or both,
as seen in Table 10.1 (APA, 2000). Individuals
with symptoms in both domains are classified as
having ADHD, combined type (ADHD-C).
Those who manifest multiple symptoms of
inattention but no or few hyperactive-impulsive
characteristics are diagnosed with ADHD,
predominately inattentive type (ADHD-PI).
The ADHD, predominately hyperactive-
impulsive type (ADHD-PHI) describes indi-
viduals with behavioral disinhibition without
significant symptoms of inattention. Table 10.1
contains the complete diagnostic contained in
the DSM-IV-TR.
PREVALENCE AND DEMOGRAPHIC
VARIABLES
Nearly 5 million children in the United States
are diagnosed with ADHD (Centers for Dis-
ease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2005).
Prevalence rates of ADHD translate, on aver-
age, to one to two children in every classroom
in America (APA, 2000). The most commonly
diagnosed subtype is ADHD-C, representing
about 50% to 75% of children diagnosed.
Another 20% to 30% are classified with
ADHD-PI, while fewer than 15% are diag-
nosed with ADHD-PHI. It is thought that
ADHD-PHI may be a developmental precursor
to the combined type, seen in preschool-age
children who have not yet manifested symp-
toms of inattention.
Boys are 2 to 9 times more likely than girls to
be diagnosed with ADHD (APA, 2000). The
gender discrepancy is more pronounced in
clinic referred than in community samples.
Higher rates among males may be at least
partially attributable to a stronger tendency for
males to present ADHD-C and comorbid dis-
ruptive behavior disorders, which are more
likely to rise to the level of clinical attention.
Girls are more likely to have ADHD-PI and
comorbid disorders are more likely to be
internalizing disorders. Because symptoms of
ADHD-PI and emotional disorders are more
likely to go unnoticed, girls with ADHD
may be underindentified and undertreated
(Biederman, 2005).
ADHD is present among all socioeconomic
levels and ethnic groups within the United
States, though prevalence and symptoms vary
by gender, age, and ethnicity (Barkley, 2003;
244 Specific Disorders
c10 21 April 2012; 9:57:7
Hersen, M., & Sturmey, P. (2012). Handbook of evidence-based practice in clinical psychology, child and adolescent disorders. Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com Created from ashford-ebooks on 2019-11-03 14:16:24. Case Analysis – Integrating Theoretical Orientations
C op
yr ig
ht ©
2 01
2. J
oh n
W ile
y &
S on
s, In
co rp
or at
ed . A
ll rig
ht s
re se
rv ed
.
TABLE 10.1 DSM-IV-TR Criteria for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
I. Either A or B:
A. Six or more of the following symptoms of inattention have been present for at least 6 months to a point that is
inappropriate for developmental level:
Inattention
1. Often does not give close attention to details or makes careless mistakes in schoolwork, work, or other
activities.
2. Often has trouble keeping attention on tasks or play activities.
3. Often does not seem to listen when spoken to directly.
4. Often does not follow through on instructions and fails to finish schoolwork, chores, or duties in the work-
place (not due to oppositional behavior or failure to understand instructions).
5. Often has trouble organizing activities.
6. Often avoids, dislikes, or doesn’t want to do things that take a lot of mental effort for a long period of time
(such as schoolwork or homework).
7. Often loses things needed for tasks and activities (e.g., toys, school assignments, pencils, books, or tools).
8. Is often easily distracted.
9. Is often forgetful in daily activities.
B. Six or more of the following symptoms of hyperactivity-impulsivity have been present for at least 6 months to an
extent that is disruptive and inappropriate for developmental level:
Hyperactivity
1. Often fidgets with hands or feet or squirms in seat when sitting still is expected.
2. Often gets up from seat when remaining in seat is expected.
3. Often excessively runs about or climbs when and where it is not appropriate (adolescents or adults may feel
very restless).
4. Often has trouble playing or doing leisure activities quietly.
5. Is often “on the go” or often acts as if “driven by a motor.”
6. Often talks excessively.
Impulsivity
7. Often blurts out answers before questions have been finished.
8. Often has trouble waiting one’s turn.
9. Often interrupts or intrudes on others (e.g., butts into conversations or games).
II. Some symptoms that cause impairment were present before age 7 years.
III. Some impairment from the symptoms is present in two or more settings (e.g., at school/work and at home).
IV. There must be clear evidence of clinically significant impairment in social, school, or work functioning.
V. The symptoms do not happen only during the course of a Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Schizophrenia, or other
Psychotic Disorder. The symptoms are not better accounted for by another mental disorder (e.g., Mood Disorder,
Anxiety Disorder, Dissociative Disorder, or a Personality Disorder). Case Analysis – Integrating Theoretical Orientations