+1 601-680-9567
ORDER NOW

Module 06 Written Assignment

Module 06 Written Assignment

Module 06 Written Assignment

Documentation of an Assessment of Nose, Mouth, Throat, and Neck

You will perform a history of a nose, mouth, throat, or neck problem that your instructor has provided you or one you have experienced, and you will perform an assessment including nose, mouth, throat, and neck. You will document your subjective and objective findings, identify actual or potential risks, and submit this in a Word document to the dropbox provided.

Please follow the instructions. Using the file I uploaded.

  • attachment

    Module6NoseMouthThroatNeck.docx

    Clients Presentation: ( Your client can make up whatever they want. They can be as dramatic. Have fun with it!)

     

     

    Subjective Data (4 points): (Review History questions. See subjective data questions in course announcements to help guide you.) (Only for Nose, Mouth, Throat and Neck).

     

     

     

     

     

    Objective Data (4 points): (See Objective Data Form in Course Announcements to help guide you.) (Only for nose, mouth, throat and neck).

     

     

     

    Describe 2 Actual/Potential Risk Factors ( 2 points):

  • attachment

    NoseMouthThroatandNeckAssignment.docx

    Title:

    Documentation of problem based assessment of the nose, throat, neck, and regional lymphatics.

     

    Purpose of Assignment:

    Learning the required components of documenting a problem based subjective and objective assessment of nose, throat, neck, and regional lymphatics. Identify abnormal findings.

     

    Course Competency:

    Demonstrate physical examination skills of the head, ears, and eyes, nose, mouth, neck, and regional lymphatics.

     

    Instructions:

     

    Content: Use of three sections:

    · Subjective

    · Objective

    · Actual or potential risk factors for the client based on the assessment findings with description or reason for selection of them.

     

    Format:

    · Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.)

     

    Resources:

    Chapter 5: SOAP Notes: The subjective and objective portion only

    Sullivan, D. D. (2012). Guide to clinical documentation. [E-Book]. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.rasmussen.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=495456&site=eds-live&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_91

     

    Smith, L. S. (2001, September). Documentation do’s and don’ts. Nursing, 31(9), 30. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.rasmussen.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=107055742&site=eds-live

     

    Documentation Grading Rubric- 10 possible points

    Levels of Achievement
    Criteria Emerging Competence Proficiency Mastery
    Subjective

    (4 Pts)

    		 Missing components such as biographic data, medications, or allergies. Symptoms analysis is incomplete. May contain objective data.

     

    		 Basic biographic data provided. Medications and allergies included. Symptoms analysis incomplete. Lacking detail. No objective data. Basic biographic data provided. Included list of medications and allergies. Symptoms analysis: PQRSTU completed. Lacking detail. No objective data. Information is solely what “client” provided. Basic biographic data provided. Included list of medications and allergies. Symptoms analysis: PQRSTU completed. Detailed. No objective data. Information is solely what “client” provided.
      Points: 1 Points: 2 Points: 3 Points: 4
    Objective

    (4 Pts)

    		 Missing components of assessment for particular system. May contain subjective data. May have signs of bias or explanation of findings. May have included words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, “okay”, and “good”.

     

    		 Includes all components of assessment for particular system. Lacks detail. Uses words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, or “good”. Contains all objective information. May have signs of bias or explanation of findings. Includes all components of assessment for particular system. Avoided use of words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, or “good”. No bias or explanation for findings evident Contains all objective information Includes all components of assessment for particular system. Detailed information provided. Avoided use of words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, or “good”. No bias or explanation for findings evident. All objective information
      Points: 1 Points: 2 Points: 3 Points: 4
    Actual or Potential Risk Factors

    (2 pts)

     

    		 Lists one to two actual or potential risk factors for the client based on the assessment findings with no description or reason for selection of them. Failure to provide any potential or actual risk factors will result in zero points for this criterion. Brief description of one or two actual or potential risk factors for the client based on assessment findings with description or reason for selection of them. Limited description of two actual or potential risk factors for the client based on the assessment findings with description or reason for selection of them. Comprehensive, detailed description of two actual or potential risk factors for the client based on the assessment findings with description or reason for selection of them.
      Points: 0.5 Points: 1 Points: 1.5 Points: 2