Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation
Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation
Deliver to the interprofessional team a presentation (20 minutes; 12-15 slides) that analyzes an existing workplace quality improvement initiative related to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of interest. The presentation’s purpose is to inform and get buy-in from the interprofessional team.
ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—various groups talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care. As a result, they must develop their skills in reviewing and evaluating performance reports. They also need to be able to communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives effectively. Patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes mandate collaboration among nursing staff members to ensure the integration of their perspectives in all quality care initiatives.
In this assessment, you will have the opportunity to analyze a quality improvement initiative in your workplace. You will then present your analysis to a group of nurses and other health care professionals. The purpose of your presentation is to inform and enlist support for the initiative from your audience.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
- Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance.
- Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative.
- Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.
- Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives.
- Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks.
- Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and work-life quality.
- Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes.
- Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.
- Communicate the QI improvement initiative evaluation in a professional, effective manner that engages the interprofessional stakeholders to implement and sustain change.
- Use correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and APA style for scholarly citations and references.
Preparation
Quality Initiative Selection
In this assessment you will deliver an analysis of an ongoing quality improvement initiative in your workplace. The initiative you analyze must relate to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. The purpose of your analysis is to assess whether specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Your audience consists of nurses and selected health care professionals with specializations or interest in your selected condition, disease, or issue. You hope to inform and garner support for the initiative from your audience. (*please include speaker notes)
- Instructions
The optional QI Initiative Evaluation Presentation Template [PPTX] is provided to help you prepare your slides. If you choose to work without the template, consider referring to Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX]. (attached)
In your presentation, you will: - Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives.
- Explain the rationale behind the QI improvement initiative. What prompted the initiative?
- Detail problems that were not addressed and any issues that arose from the initiative.
- Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks.
- Analyze the benchmarks used to evaluate success. Which aspects of the initiative were most successful? What outcome measures are missing or could be added?
- Incorporate one appropriate supporting visual (such as a graph or chart) that showcases the most critical aspect of this presentation.
- Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes.
- Integrate the perspectives of interprofessional team members involved in the initiative. Who did you talk to? What are their professions? How did their perspectives impact your analysis?
- Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative.
- Identify specific process or protocol changes as well as technologies that would improve quality outcomes.
- Communicate the QI initiative evaluation in a professional, effective manner that engages the interprofessional stakeholders to implement and sustain change.
- Use correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and APA style for scholarly citations and references.
- Additional Requirements
- Presentation length: A maximum of 20 minutes.
- Number of slides: 12–15 slides. Balance text and visuals. Avoid text-heavy slides. Use speaker’s notes for additional content.
- Font and font size: Appropriate size and weight for presentation, generally 24–28 points for headings; no smaller than 18 points for bullet-point text. Use a suitable professional typeface such as Times or Arial throughout the presentation.
- Number of references: Cite a minimum of 7 current scholarly and/or authoritative sources to support your analysis. Current is defined as no older than 5 years unless a seminal work.
- APA formatting: Adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references. Consult these resources for an APA refresher:
- APA Style & Format.
- APA Module.
- American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA style. Retrieved from https://www.apastyle.org/
-
Assessment2InstructionsQualityImprovementInitiative….pdfPage 1 of 3https://courserooma.capella.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_319030_1&content_id=_10040386_1
!””#””$#%&'(‘)%”&*+,&-.%”/’0+12-&3′)$4*.5#$#%&’)%-&-1&-5# 6512+1&-.%
!”#$%”&'()'(*”‘$+(“&,&)-“..$)+/#'(“/0’/’,&”.”+(/($)+’123’0$+4(“.5’62768′.#$9”.:'(*/(‘/+/#;<“.’/+'”=$.($+>’?)&@,#/A”
B4/#$(;’$0,&)%”0″+(‘$+$($/($%”‘&”#/(“9′()’/’.,”A$-$A’9$.”/.”C’A)+9$($)+C’)&’,4D#$A’*”/#(*’$..4″‘)-‘$+(“&”.(E’F*”
,&”.”+(/($)+G.’,4&,).”‘$.'()’$+-)&0’/+9’>”(‘D4;7$+’-&)0′(*”‘$+(“&,&)-“..$)+/#'(“/0E”
F))’)-(“+C’9$.A4..$)+.’/D)4(‘B4/#$(;’*”/#(*’A/&”C’A/&”‘A).(.C’/+9’)4(A)0″‘0″/.4&”.'(/@”‘,#/A”‘$+’$.)#/($)+H%/&$)4.
>&)4,.'(/#@$+>’/0)+>'(*”0.”#%”.’/D)4(‘&”.4#(.’/+9′”+*/+A”0″+(.E’I4&.”.’/&”‘A&$($A/#'()'(*”‘9″#$%”&;’)-‘*$>*7
B4/#$(;C'”–$A$”+(‘*”/#(*’A/&”E’J.’/’&”.4#(C'(*”;’04.(‘9″%”#),'(*”$&’.@$##.’$+’&”%$”?$+>’/+9′”%/#4/($+>’,”&-)&0/+A”
&”,)&(.E’F*”;’/#.)’+””9′()’D”‘/D#”‘()’A)004+$A/(“‘)4(A)0″‘0″/.4&”.’&”#/(“9′()’B4/#$(;’$+$($/($%”.'”–“A($%”#;E
K/($”+(‘./-“(;’/+9’,).$($%”‘$+.($(4($)+/#’*”/#(*’A/&”‘)4(A)0”.’0/+9/(“‘A)##/D)&/($)+’/0)+>’+4&.$+>’.(/–‘0″0D”&.
()'”+.4&”‘(*”‘$+(“>&/($)+’)-‘(*”$&’,”&.,”A($%”.’$+’/##’B4/#$(;’A/&”‘$+$($/($%”.E
L+'(*$.’/..”..0″+(C’;)4′?$##’*/%”‘(*”‘),,)&(4+$(;'()’/+/#;<“‘/’B4/#$(;’$0,&)%”0″+(‘$+$($/($%”‘$+’;)4&’?)&@,#/A”E’M)4
?$##'(*”+’,&”.”+(‘;)4&’/+/#;.$.'()’/’>&)4,’)-‘+4&.”.’/+9’)(*”&’*”/#(*’A/&”‘,&)-“..$)+/#.E’F*”‘,4&,).”‘)-‘;)4&
,&”.”+(/($)+’$.'()’$+-)&0’/+9′”+#$.(‘.4,,)&(‘-)&'(*”‘$+$($/($%”‘-&)0′;)4&’/49$”+A”E
7#$.%”&*1&-.%’.8’9*.8-,-#%,37#$.%”&*1&-.%’.8’9*.8-,-#%,3
N;’.4AA”..-4##;’A)0,#”($+>'(*$.’/..”..0″+(C’;)4′?$##’9″0)+.(&/(“‘;)4&’,&)-$A$”+A;’$+'(*”‘-)##)?$+>’A)4&.”
A)0,”(“+A$”.'(*&)4>*'(*”‘-)##)?$+>’/..”..0″+(‘.A)&$+>’>4$9″‘A&$(“&$/O
P)0,”(“+A;’2O’K#/+’B4/#$(;’$0,&)%”0″+(‘$+$($/($%”.’$+’&”.,)+.”‘()’&)4($+”‘9/(/’.4&%”$##/+A”E
Q”A)00″+9’/99$($)+/#’$+9$A/()&.’/+9′,&)()A)#.'()’$0,&)%”‘/+9′”=,/+9′)4(A)0″.’)-‘/’B4/#$(;
$+$($/($%”E
P)0,”(“+A;’RO’S%/#4/(“‘B4/#$(;’$0,&)%”0″+(‘$+$($/($%”.’4.$+>’.”+.$($%”‘/+9’.)4+9′)4(A)0″‘0″/.4&”.E
J+/#;<“‘/’A4&&”+(‘B4/#$(;’$0,&)%”0″+(‘$+$($/($%”‘$+’/’*”/#(*’A/&”‘)&’,&/A($A”‘.”(($+>’/AA)&9$+>'()
.(&/(“>$A’)&>/+$</($)+/#’$+$($/($%”.E
S%/#4/(“‘(*”‘.4AA”..’)-‘/’A4&&”+(‘B4/#$(;’$0,&)%”0″+(‘$+$($/($%”‘/AA)&9$+>'()’&”A)>+$<“9’+/($)+/#
D”+A*0/&@.E
P)0,”(“+A;’TO’L+(“>&/(“‘$+(“&,&)-“..$)+/#’,”&.,”A($%”.'()’#”/9’B4/#$(;’$0,&)%”0″+(.’$+’,/($”+(‘./-“(;C’A).(7
“–“A($%”+”..C’/+9’?)&@7#$-“‘B4/#$(;E
L+A)&,)&/(“‘$+(“&,&)-“..$)+/#’,”&.,”A($%”.’&”#/(“9′()’$+$($/($%”‘-4+A($)+/#$(;’/+9’)4(A)0”.E
P)0,”(“+A;’8O’J,,#;'”–“A($%”‘A)004+$A/($)+’.(&/(“>$”.'()’,&)0)(“‘B4/#$(;’$0,&)%”0″+(‘)-
$+(“&,&)-“..$)+/#’A/&”E
P)004+$A/(“‘(*”‘UL’$0,&)%”0″+(‘$+$($/($%”‘”%/#4/($)+’$+’/’,&)-“..$)+/#C'”–“A($%”‘0/++”&'(*/(
“+>/>”.'(*”‘$+(“&,&)-“..$)+/#’.(/@”*)#9″&.'()’$0,#”0″+(‘/+9’.4.(/$+’A*/+>”E
V.”‘A)&&”A(‘>&/00/&C’,4+A(4/($)+C’.,”##$+>C’/+9’JKJ’.(;#”‘-)&’.A*)#/&#;’A$(/($)+.’/+9’&”-“&”+A”.E
9*#41*1&-.%9*#41*1&-.%
P)4&.”‘I/%$>/($)+ ! W$A*”##”‘!;@”.
XJPVYFM’ !”#$% !
!/+$”#’I)&#$+
PZJP[ !
F4()&$/#. \4,,)&( Y)>’Z4( ‘:#””-,1’;1$.”
Jessica RamosJessica Ramos6/14/21, 7:01 PMAssessment 2 Instructions: Quality Improvement Initiative …
Page 2 of 3https://courserooma.capella.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_319030_1&content_id=_10040386_1
9*#41*1&-.%9*#41*1&-.%
&'()*+,”-.*+*(+*/0″10)02+*3.
L+'(*$.’/..”..0″+(‘;)4′?$##’9″#$%”&’/+’/+/#;.$.’)-‘/+’)+>)$+>’B4/#$(;’$0,&)%”0″+(‘$+$($/($%”‘$+’;)4&’?)&@,#/A”E’F*”
$+$($/($%”‘;)4’/+/#;<“’04.(‘&”#/(“‘()’/’.,”A$-$A’9$.”/.”C’A)+9$($)+C’)&’,4D#$A’*”/#(*’$..4″‘)-‘,”&.)+/#’)&’,&)-“..$)+/#
$+(“&”.(‘()’;)4E’F*”‘,4&,).”‘)-‘;)4&’/+/#;.$.’$.'()’/..”..’?*”(*”&’.,”A$-$A’B4/#$(;’$+9$A/()&.’,)$+(‘()’$0,&)%”9
,/($”+(‘./-“(;C’B4/#$(;’)-‘A/&”C’A).(‘/+9′”–$A$”+A;’>)/#.C’/+9′)(*”&’9″.$&”9’0″(&$A.E’M)4&’/49$”+A”‘A)+.$.(.’)-‘+4&.”.
/+9’.”#”A(“9’*”/#(*’A/&”‘,&)-“..$)+/#.’?$(*’.,”A$/#$</($)+.’)&’$+(“&”.(‘$+’;)4&’.”#”A(“9’A)+9$($)+C’9$.”/.”C’)&’$..4″E
M)4’*),”‘()’$+-)&0’/+9′>/&+”&’.4,,)&(‘-)&'(*”‘$+$($/($%”‘-&)0′;)4&’/49$”+A”E
402356*.7″83’5″950:0.+(+*3.
F)’,&”,/&”‘()’&”A)&9’/’%)$A”7)%”&’-)&’;)4&’,&”.”+(/($)+O
\”(‘4,’/+9′(“.(‘;)4&’0$A&),*)+”‘)&’*”/9.”(‘4.$+>'(*”‘$+.(/##/($)+’$+.(&4A($)+.’,&)%$9″9’D;'(*”
0/+4-/A(4&”&E’M)4′)+#;’+””9′()’4.”‘(*”‘*”/9.”(‘$-‘;)4&’/49$)’$.’+)(‘A#”/&’/+9’*$>*’B4/#$(;’?*”+’A/,(4&”9’D;
(*”‘0$A&),*)+”E’
K&/A($A”‘4.$+>'(*”‘”B4$,0″+(‘()'”+.4&”‘(*”‘/49$)’B4/#$(;’$.’.4–$A$”+(E
P)+.4#(‘V.$+>’]/#(4&/’^K!X_’-)&’>4$9/+A”‘)+’*)?'()’&”A)&9′;)4&’,&”.”+(/($)+’/+9’4,#)/9’$(‘$+'(*”
A)4&.”&))0E
W$A&).)-(‘K)?”&K)$+(‘/#.)’/##)?.’;)4′()’&”A)&9′;)4&’+/&&/($)+’?$(*’;)4&’.#$9″.E’L-‘;)4’A*)).”‘(*$.’),($)+C
.$0,#;’.4D0$(‘;)4&’,&”.”+(/($)+'()'(*”‘/,,&),&$/(“‘/&”/’)-‘(*”‘A)4&.”&))0E’M)4&’+/&&/($)+’?$##’D”‘$+A#49″9
?$(*’;)4&’.#$9″.E’
Q”0″0D”&'()’,&/A($A”‘9″#$%”&$+>’/+9’&”A)&9$+>’;)4&’,&”.”+(/($)+’04#($,#”‘($0″.'()'”+.4&”‘”–“A($%”‘9″#$%”&;E
I)(“O’L-‘;)4’&”B4$&”‘(*”‘4.”‘)-‘/..$.($%”‘(“A*+)#)>;’)&’/#(“&+/($%”‘A)004+$A/($)+’0″(*)9.'()’,/&($A$,/(“‘$+'(*$.
/A($%$(;C’,#”/.”‘A)+(/A(‘!$./D$#$(;’\”&%$A”.’/(‘!$./D$#$(;\”&%$A”.`P/,”##/E”94′()’&”B4″.(‘/AA)00)9/($)+.E
)%”&*+,&-.%”)%”&*+,&-.%”
F*”‘),($)+/#’UL’L+$($/($%”‘S%/#4/($)+’K&”.”+(/($)+’F”0,#/(“‘^KKFa_’$.’,&)%$9″9′()’*”#,’;)4′,&”,/&”‘;)4&’.#$9″.E’L-‘;)4
A*)).”‘()’?)&@’?$(*)4(‘(*”‘(“0,#/(“C’A)+.$9″&’&”-“&&$+>'()’b4$9″#$+”.’-)&’S–“A($%”‘K)?”&K)$+(‘K&”.”+(/($)+.
^KKFa_E
L+’;)4&’,&”.”+(/($)+C’;)4′?$##O
J+/#;<“‘/’A4&&”+(‘B4/#$(;’$0,&)%”0″+(‘$+$($/($%”‘$+’/’*”/#(*’A/&”‘)&’,&/A($A”‘.”(($+>’/AA)&9$+>'()’.(&/(“>$A
)&>/+$</($)+/#’$+$($/($%”.E
S=,#/$+'(*”‘&/($)+/#”‘D”*$+9′(*”‘UL’$0,&)%”0″+(‘$+$($/($%”E’c*/(‘,&)0,(“9′(*”‘$+$($/($%”d’
!”(/$#’,&)D#”0.'(*/(‘?”&”‘+)(‘/99&”..”9’/+9’/+;’$..4″.'(*/(‘/&).”‘-&)0′(*”‘$+$($/($%”E
S%/#4/(“‘(*”‘.4AA”..’)-‘/’A4&&”+(‘B4/#$(;’$0,&)%”0″+(‘$+$($/($%”‘/AA)&9$+>'()’&”A)>+$<“9’+/($)+/#
D”+A*0/&@.E
J+/#;<“‘(*”‘D”+A*0/&@.’4.”9′()'”%/#4/(“‘.4AA”..E’c*$A*’/.,”A(.’)-‘(*”‘$+$($/($%”‘?”&”‘0).(
.4AA”..-4#d”c*/(‘)4(A)0″‘0″/.4&”.’/&”‘0$..$+>’)&’A)4#9’D”‘/99″9d
L+A)&,)&/(“‘)+”‘/,,&),&$/(“‘.4,,)&($+>’%$.4/#’1.4A*’/.’/’>&/,*’)&’A*/&(:'(*/(‘.*)?A/.”.'(*”‘0).(
A&$($A/#’/.,”A(‘)-‘(*$.’,&”.”+(/($)+E
6/14/21, 7:01 PMAssessment 2 Instructions: Quality Improvement Initiative …
Page 3 of 3https://courserooma.capella.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_319030_1&content_id=_10040386_1
L+A)&,)&/(“‘$+(“&,&)-“..$)+/#’,”&.,”A($%”.’&”#/(“9′()’$+$($/($%”‘-4+A($)+/#$(;’/+9’)4(A)0”.E
L+(“>&/(“‘(*”‘,”&.,”A($%”.’)-‘$+(“&,&)-“..$)+/#'(“/0’0″0D”&.’$+%)#%”9’$+'(*”‘$+$($/($%”E’c*)’9$9’;)4′(/#@'()d
c*/(‘/&”‘(*”$&’,&)-“..$)+.d”[)?’9$9′(*”$&’,”&.,”A($%”.’$0,/A(‘;)4&’/+/#;.$.d
Q”A)00″+9’/99$($)+/#’$+9$A/()&.’/+9’,&)()A)#.'()’$0,&)%”‘/+9′”=,/+9′)4(A)0″.’)-‘/’B4/#$(;’$+$($/($%”E
L9″+($-;’.,”A$-$A’,&)A”..’)&’,&)()A)#’A*/+>”.’/.’?”##’/.'(“A*+)#)>$”.'(*/(‘?)4#9’$0,&)%”‘B4/#$(;
)4(A)0″.E
P)004+$A/(“‘(*”‘UL’$+$($/($%”‘”%/#4/($)+’$+’/’,&)-“..$)+/#C'”–“A($%”‘0/++”&'(*/(‘”+>/>”.'(*”
$+(“&,&)-“..$)+/#’.(/@”*)#9″&.'()’$0,#”0″+(‘/+9’.4.(/$+’A*/+>”E
V.”‘A)&&”A(‘>&/00/&C’,4+A(4/($)+C’.,”##$+>C’/+9’JKJ’.(;#”‘-)&’.A*)#/&#;’A$(/($)+.’/+9’&”-“&”+A”.E
!<<-&-.%12′;#=+-*#$#%&”!<<-&-.%12′;#=+-*#$#%&”
950:0.+(+*3.”)0.7+;<‘J’0/=$040′)-’23’0$+4(“.E
#’=>05″3?”:)*60:<’62e68’.#$9″.E’N/#/+A”‘(“=(‘/+9’%$.4/#.E’J%)$9′(“=(7*”/%;’.#$9”.E’V.”‘.,”/@”&G.’+)(“.’-)&
/99$($)+/#’A)+(“+(E
@3.+”(.6″?3.+”:*A0<‘J,,&),&$/(“‘.$<“‘/+9’?”$>*(‘-)&’,&”.”+(/($)+C’>”+”&/##;’2Te2f’,)$+(.’-)&’*”/9$+>.5’+)
.0/##”&'(*/+’6f’,)$+(.’-)&’D4##”(7,)$+(‘(“=(E’V.”‘/’.4$(/D#”‘,&)-“..$)+/#'(;,”-/A”‘.4A*’/.’F$0″.’)&’J&$/#
(*&)4>*)4(‘(*”‘,&”.”+(/($)+E
#’=>05″3?”50?050.20:<‘P$(“‘/’0$+$040’)-‘g’A4&&”+(‘.A*)#/&#;’/+9h)&’/4(*)&$(/($%”‘.)4&A”.'()’.4,,)&(‘;)4&
/+/#;.$.E’P4&&”+(‘$.’9″-$+”9’/.’+)’)#9″&'(*/+’8′;”/&.’4+#”..’/’.”0$+/#’?)&@E
B9B”?35=(++*.7<‘J9*”&”‘()’JKJ’.(;#”‘/+9′-)&0/(($+>’>4$9″#$+”.’-)&’A$(/($)+.’/+9’&”-“&”+A”.E’P)+.4#(‘(*”.”
&”.)4&A”.’-)&’/+’JKJ’&”-&”.*”&O’
JKJ’\(;#”‘i’X)&0/(E
JKJ’W)94#”E
J0″&$A/+’K.;A*)#)>$A/#’J..)A$/($)+E’1+E9E:E’JKJ’.(;#”E’Q”(&$”%”9′-&)0’*((,.Ohh???E/,/.(;#”E)&>h
1CD4-#E”EF-G$
V.”‘(*”‘.A)&$+>’>4$9″‘()’4+9″&.(/+9’*)?’;)4&’/..”..0″+(‘?$##’D”‘”%/#4/(“9E
H-$%”1CD4-#E”EF-G$ ”
-
QualityImprovementInitiativeEvaluationScoringGuide.pdf
6/14/21, 7:01 PMQuality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Scoring Guide
Page 1 of 2https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX6016/210400/Scoring_Guides/a02_scoring_guide.html
Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks.
Does not evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks.
Attempts to evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks; however, omissions and/or errors exist.
Evaluates the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks.
Evaluates the success of a current quality improvement initiative according to recognized national benchmarks; identifies assumptions on which the evaluation is based.
Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes.
Does not incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes.
Incorporates interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes in minimal depth and detail.
Incorporates interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes.
Incorporates interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes; identifies areas of uncertainty, knowledge gaps, and additional information needed to gain a more complete understanding.
Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative.
Does not recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative.
Recommends additional indicators and protocols but does not make a case as to how recommendations could improve or expand quality outcomes.
Recommends additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative.
Recommends additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative; impartially explains recommendations’ pros and cons.
Communicate the QI initiative evaluation in a professional, effective manner that engages the interprofessional stakeholders to implement and sustain change.
Does not communicate the QI initiative evaluation in a professional, effective manner that engages the interprofessional stakeholders to implement and sustain change.
Attempts to communicate the QI initiative evaluation in a professional, effective manner; however, communication does not always engage stakeholders to implement and sustain change; lapses exist in professionalism and effectiveness.
Communicates the QI initiative evaluation in a professional, effective manner that engages the interprofessional stakeholders to implement and sustain change.
Communicates the QI initiative evaluation in a professional, effective manner that engages the interprofessional stakeholders to implement and sustain change. Communication includes multiple specifics, examples, and references to current scholarly and/or authoritative sources.
Use correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and APA style for scholarly citations and references.
Does not use correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and APA style for scholarly citations and references.
Attempts to use correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and APA style for scholarly citations and references; however, omissions and/or errors exist.
Uses correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and APA style for scholarly citations and references.
Uses correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and APA style for scholarly citations and references without errors or omissions.
6/14/21, 7:01 PMQuality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Scoring Guide
Page 2 of 2https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX6016/210400/Scoring_Guides/a02_scoring_guide.html
Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives.
Does not analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives,
Minimally analyzes a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives.
Analyzes a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives.
Analyzes a current quality improvement initiative in a health care or practice setting according to strategic organizational initiatives. Supports analysis with multiple specifics, examples, and references to current, scholarly and/or authoritative sources.
-
cf_qi_presentation_template.pptx
Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation: Assessment 2: Add the Title of the QuaIity Improvement Initiative
Add your name
MSN-FPX6016
Add the Date
1
Analysis of Quality Improvement Initiative: Part 1
Organization’s Strategic Initiatives
Rationale Supporting the Quality Improvement Initiative
2
Analysis of Quality Improvement Initiative: Part 2
The Importance of the Quality Improvement Initiative
Specific Implications of the Quality Improvement Initiative
3
Evaluation of the Quality Improvement Initiative
National Benchmarks Supporting the Quality Improvement Initiative
Analysis of the Benchmarks Related to the Quality Improvement Initiative
4
Evaluation of the Quality Improvement Initiative
Successful Quality Improvement Initiative Outcomes
Additions to the Quality Improvement Initiative
5
Critical Aspects of the Quality Improvement Initiative
Add your visual here
6
Interprofessional Team
Interprofessional Team Members Involved in the Quality Improvement Initiative
Team Member Perspectives
Impact of Team Member Perspectives on the Quality Improvement Initiative
7
Recommendations for the Future: Part 1
Additional Indicators to Expand Knowledge of Quality
New Technology to Enhance Outcomes
8
Recommendations for the Future: Part 2
New Protocols to Enhance Quality
9
Questions
Thank you for participating today!
10
References
Add the references here
11
-
effectivePPTexample.pptx
Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations
Introduction
One concern about visual presentations is that the technology used to create them can be used in such a way that it actually detracts from the message rather than enhances it. To help you consider carefully how your message is presented so that it reflects care, quality, and professionalism, consider the information provided in the remaining slides.
NOTE: This presentation serves as an example in itself, by utilizing all of the guidelines mentioned.
Outline
Writing
Organization
Audience
Design
Images
Bullets
Tables
Font
Speaker Notes
The following topics will be covered:
Writing
Present ideas succinctly with lean prose.
Use short sentences.
Use active, rather than passive voice.
Avoid negative statements, if possible.
Avoid double negative entirely.
Check spelling and grammar.
Use consistent capitalization rules.
Organization
Develop a clear, strategic introduction to provide context for the presentation.
Develop an agenda or outline slide to provide a roadmap for the presentation.
Group relevant pieces of information together.
Integrate legends and keys with charts and tables.
Organize slides in logical order.
Present one concept or idea per slide.
Use only one conclusion slide to recap main ideas.
Audience
Present information at language level of intended audience.
Do not use jargon or field-specific language.
Follow the 70% rule—If it does not apply to 70% of your audience, present it to individuals at a different time.
Design
Use a consistent design throughout the presentation.
Keep layout and other features consistent.
Use the master slide design feature to ensure consistency.
Use consistent horizontal and vertical alignment of slide elements throughout the presentation.
Leave ample space around images and text.
Images
When applicable, enhance text-only slide content by developing relevant images for your presentation.
Do not use gratuitous graphics on each slide.
Use animations only when needed to enhance meaning. If selected, use them sparingly and consistently.
Bullets
Use bullets unless showing rank or sequence of items.
If possible, use no more than five bullet points and eight lines of text total per slide.
Tables
Use simple tables to show numbers, with no more than 4 rows x 4 columns.
Reserve more detailed tables for a written summary.
Font
Keep font size at 24 point or above for slide titles.
Keep font size at 18 or above for headings and explanatory text.
Use sans serif fonts such as Arial or Verdana.
Use ample contrast between backgrounds and text.
Speaker Notes
Summarize key information.
Provide explanation.
Discuss application and implication to the field, discipline or work setting.
Document the narration you would use with each slide.
-
ScreenShot2021-06-29at7.47.16PM.png
-
ScreenShot2021-06-23at6.24.18PM.png