Industrial Psychology Assignment Paper

ASSIGNMENT 04

PS450 Industrial Organizational Psychology

Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling, and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double‐spaced pages; refer to the “Format Requirementsʺ page for specific format requirements. Industrial Psychology Assignment Paper

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

Part A

 

1. Briefly describe the Hawthorne studies and explain their results.

 

2. Describe how these results are reflected in contemporary practice and work environment, providing two (2) examples.

 

Part B

 

1. Compare and contrast experimental and correlational methods, providing one (1) similarity and one (1) difference.

 

2. Provide two (2) examples of studies that use experimental methods and two (2) examples of studies that use correlational methods.

 

Part C

 

1. Compare and contrast two (2) methods of job analysis, providing one (1) similarity and one (1) difference.

 

2. Which of the two (2) methods you described is more efficient and when? Provide two (2) supporting facts to justify your position.

 

Part D

 

Discuss the use of subjective personal opinions in making hiring decisions. Describe two (2) reasons that support using subjective personal opinions and two (2) reasons against such use. Industrial Psychology Assignment Paper

 

 

Grading Rubric

 

Please refer to the rubric below for the grading criteria for this assignment.

 

 

 

CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical summary of the

Hawthorne study, including

the results.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical summary of the

Hawthorne study, including

the results.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical summary of

the Hawthorne study,

including the results.

Student provides a weak or

unclear summary of the

Hawthorne study,

including the results.

15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of how

the Hawthorne results are

reflected in contemporary

practice and work

environment, with at least 2

clear, logical examples.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

how the Hawthorne results

are reflected in

contemporary practice and

work environment, with at

least 2 mostly clear, logical

examples.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

how the Hawthorne results

are reflected in

contemporary practice and

work environment, with at

least 2 partially clear, logical

examples.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of how the

Hawthorne results are

reflected in contemporary

practice and work

environment, with at least

1 partially clear, logical

example.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of

experimental methods and

correlational methods with

at least 1 similarity and 1

difference.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

experimental methods and

correlational methods with

at least 1 similarity and 1

difference.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

experimental methods and

correlational methods with

at least 1 similarity and 1

difference.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of

experimental methods and

correlational methods with

at least 1 similarity or 1

difference.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical example of at least 2

studies that use

experimental methods and

at least 2 studies that use

correlational methods.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical example of at

least 2 studies that use

experimental methods and

at least 2 studies that use

correlational methods.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical example of 1-2

studies that use

experimental methods and

1-2 studies that use

correlational methods.

Student provides a weak or

unclear example of 1-2

studies that use

experimental methods and

1-2 studies that use

correlational methods.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of 2 job

analysis methods with at

least 1 similarity and at least

1 difference.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of 2

job analysis methods with at

least 1 similarity and at least

1 difference.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

2 job analysis methods with

at least 1 similarity and at

least 1 difference.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of 2 job

analysis methods with at

least 1 similarity or at least

1 difference.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of which

of the 2 job analysis methods

described is more efficient,

along with at least 2 clear,

logical supporting facts.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

which of the 2 job analysis

methods described is more

efficient, along with at least

2 mostly clear, logical

supporting facts.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

which of the 2 job analysis

methods described is more

efficient, along with at least

2 partially clear, logical

supporting facts.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of which of the

2 job analysis methods

described is more

efficient, along with at

least 1 partially clear,

logical supporting fact.

Hawthorne studies

summary (10 points)

Experimental/Correl

ational –

compare/contrast

(10 points)

Experimental/Correl

ational – examples

(10 points)

Reflection (15

points)

Job analysis

methods –

compare/contrast

(10 points)

Job analysis

methods – efficiency

(10 points)

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides at least 2

clear, logical arguments that

support the use of subjective

personal opinions in making

hiring decisions, and at least

2 clear, logical arguments

against the use of subjective

personal opinions in making

hiring decisions.

Student provides at least 2

mostly clear, logical

arguments that support the

use of subjective personal

opinions in making hiring

decisions, and at least 2

mostly clear, logical

arguments against the use of

subjective personal opinions

in making hiring decisions.

Student provides at least 2

partially clear, logical

arguments that support the

use of subjective personal

opinions in making hiring

decisions, and at least 2

partially clear, logical

arguments against the use

of subjective personal

opinions in making hiring

decisions.

Student provides at least 1

partially clear, logical

argument that supports

the use of subjective

personal opinions in

making hiring decisions,

and at least 1 partially

clear, logical argument

against the use of

subjective personal

opinions in making hiring

decisions.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student makes no errors in

grammar or spelling that

distract the reader from the

content.

Student makes 1-2 errors in

grammar or spelling that

distract the reader from the

content.

Student makes 3-4 errors in

grammar or spelling that

distract the reader from the

content.

Student makes more than

4 errors in grammar or

spelling that distract the

reader from the content.

15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points

The paper is written in

proper format. All sources

used for quotes and facts are

credible and cited correctly.

Excellent organization,

including a variety of

thoughtful transitions.

The paper is written in

proper format with only 1-2

errors. All sources used for

quotes and facts are credible

and most are cited correctly.

Adequate organization

includes a variety of

appropriate transitions.

The paper is written in

proper format with only 3-5

errors. Most sources used

for quotes and facts are

credible and cited correctly.

Essay is poorly organized,

but may include a few

effective transitions.

The paper is not written in

proper format. Many

sources used for quotes

and facts are less than

credible (suspect) and/or

are not cited correctly.

Essay is disorganized and

does not include effective

transitions.

Format – APA

Format, Citations,

Organization,

Transitions (15

Points)

Mechanics –

Grammar,

Punctuation,

Spelling (10 Points)

Subjective personal

opinions (10 points)

ASSIGNMENT 08

PS450 Industrial Organizational Psychology

Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling, and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double‐spaced pages; refer to the “Format Requirementsʺ page for specific format requirements. Industrial Psychology Assignment Paper

 

Part A

 

1. Describe three (3) criteria used to evaluate performance in your current or past job.

 

2. Discuss the issues of criterion relevance, criterion contamination, criterion deficiency, and criterion usefulness as they pertain to the performance criteria used in your current or previous work organization. Industrial Psychology Assignment Paper

 

Part B

 

1. Describe three (3) differences between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation.

 

2. Describe one (1) school or work experience when you have experienced each type of motivation.

 

Part C

 

Identify and describe two (2) sources of conflict in work organizations. Provide one (1) example for each source of conflict.

 

Part D

 

Provide one (1) example of a situation where a relationship-oriented leader would be most effective and one (1) example of a situation where a task-oriented leader would be most effective. Industrial Psychology Assignment Paper

 

Grading Rubric

 

Please refer to the rubric on the next page for the grading criteria for this assignment.

 

CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of at least

3 criteria used to evaluate

performance in his/her

current or past job.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of 2-

3 criteria used to evaluate

performance in his/her

current or past job.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

1-2 criteria used to evaluate

performance in his/her

current or past job.

Student provides a weak or

unclear description of 1-2

criteria used to evaluate

performance in his/her

current or past job.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of all of

the following in how they

pertain to the performance

criteria used in his/her

current or previous work

organization: criterion

relevance, criterion

contamination, criterion

deficiency, and criterion

usefulness.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

at least 3 of the following in

how they pertain to the

performance criteria used in

his/her current or previous

work organization: criterion

relevance, criterion

contamination, criterion

deficiency, and criterion

usefulness.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

at least 2 of the following in

how they pertain to the

performance criteria used

in his/her current or

previous work organization:

criterion relevance,

criterion contamination,

criterion deficiency, and

criterion usefulness.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of at least 1 of

the following in how they

pertain to the performance

criteria used in his/her

current or previous work

organization: criterion

relevance, criterion

contamination, criterion

deficiency, and criterion

usefulness.

15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of at least

3 differences between

intrinsic and extrinsic

motivation.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

at least 3 differences

between intrinsic and

extrinsic motivation.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

at least 2 differences

between intrinsic and

extrinsic motivation.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of at least 1

difference between

intrinsic and extrinsic

motivation.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of at least

1 school or work experience

when she/he has

experienced intrinsic

motivation and extrinsic

motivation.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

at least 1 school or work

experience when she/he

has experienced intrinsic

motivation and extrinsic

motivation.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

at least 1 school or work

experience when she/he

has experienced intrinsic

motivation and extrinsic

motivation.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of at least 1

school or work experience

when she/he has

experienced intrinsic

motivation or extrinsic

motivation.

15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of at least

2 sources of conflict in the

workplace, along with at

least 1 clear, logical example

of each source of conflict.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

at least 2 sources of conflict

in the workplace, along with

at least 1 mostly clear,

logical example of each

source of conflict.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

at least 2 sources of conflict

in the workplace, along

with at least 1 partially

clear, logical example of

each source of conflict.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of at least 1

source of conflict in the

workplace, along with at

least 1 partially clear,

logical example.

15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of at least

1 example of a situation

where a relationship-

oriented leader would be

most effective and 1

example of a situation where

a task-oriented leader would

be most effective.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

at least 1 example of a

situation where a

relationship-oriented leader

would be most effective and

1 example of a situation

where a task-oriented

leader would be most

effective.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

at least 1 example of a

situation where a

relationship-oriented

leader would be most

effective and 1 example of

a situation where a task-

oriented leader would be

most effective.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of at least 1

example of a situation

where a relationship-

oriented leader would be

most effective or 1

example of a situation

where a task-oriented

leader would be most

effective.

Performance

evaluation criteria

(10 points)

Intrinsic vs. extrinsic

motivation (15

points)

Experiences (10

points)

Performance criteria

issues (10 points)

Relationship-

oriented leader vs

task-oriented leader

(15 points)

Sources of conflict

(15 points)

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student makes no errors in

grammar or spelling that

distract the reader from the

content.

Student makes 1-2 errors in

grammar or spelling that

distract the reader from the

content.

Student makes 3-4 errors in

grammar or spelling that

distract the reader from the

content.

Student makes more than

4 errors in grammar or

spelling that distract the

reader from the content.

15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points

The paper is written in

proper format. All sources

used for quotes and facts are

credible and cited correctly.

Excellent organization,

including a variety of

thoughtful transitions.

The paper is written in

proper format with only 1-2

errors. All sources used for

quotes and facts are credible

and most are cited correctly.

Adequate organization

includes a variety of

appropriate transitions.

The paper is written in

proper format with only 3-5

errors. Most sources used

for quotes and facts are

credible and cited correctly.

Essay is poorly organized,

but may include a few

effective transitions.

The paper is not written in

proper format. Many

sources used for quotes

and facts are less than

credible (suspect) and/or

are not cited correctly.

Essay is disorganized and

does not include effective

transitions.

Format – APA

Format, Citations,

Organization,

Transitions (15

Points)

Mechanics –

Grammar,

Punctuation,

Spelling (10 Points)