Discussion: Clinical Supervision – Kaltura Wk4 (1)

Substance use disorders are complicated psychiatric and medical conditions that involve physical addiction as well as psychological or emotional dependence. Substance use disorders are some of the most difficult to treat. It takes a great deal of patience on the part of the provider and the client. It may take several attempts before a client is successfully able to “kick the habit.” Your guidance and patience can help the client to persevere through difficult times during the journey to recovery.

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

Clinical Supervision is an essential component of your development as a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner. It provides an opportunity for professional collaboration as you share experiences with and gain insights from colleagues. For this Clinical Supervision, consider a client with a substance abuse disorder whom you do not think is adequately progressing according to expected clinical outcomes. Discussion: Clinical Supervision – Kaltura Wk4 (1)

Learning Objectives

Students will:

Analyze clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders
Evaluate effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders
Recommend treatment plans

To prepare for this Discussion:

Review this week’s Learning Resources concerning treating patients with substance-related and addictive disorders.
Reflect on a client you are currently counseling or have previously counseled at your practicum site who has been diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders.

Post a 3- to 5-minute Kaltura video in which you do the following:

Describe the client. Note: Do not use the client’s actual name.

Explain your therapeutic approach with the client, including the perceived effectiveness of your approach.

Identify any additional information about this client that may potentially impact expected outcomes.

Provide specific recommendations for the client to help them in determining why they are not progressing and what your suggested treatment plan consists of.

It is useful to consult the Prochaska and DiClement model.

Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources less than five years in APA format, including introduction and conclusion

RubricDetailBlackboardLearn.pdf

12/8/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 1/4

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is re�ecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

* Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) *is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

* Responds to the discussion question(s) *is re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

* Responds to most of the discussion question(s) *is somewhat re�ective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

* Responds to some of the discussion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are super�cially addressed *is somewhat lacking re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

* Does not respond to the discussion question(s) * lacks depth or super�cially addresses criteria *lacks re�ection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references

Name: NRNP_6670_Week4_Discussion_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

12/8/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 2/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

*Written somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting errors

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

Main Posting: Timely and full participation

10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation

First Reponse Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * response may not be on topic, lacks depth

12/8/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 3/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

First Reponse: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited

First Reponse: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation

Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is re�ective and justi�ed with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%) * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%) * response may not be on topic, lacks depth

12/8/2020 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16767320_1&rubric_id=_2033609_1 4/4

OutstandingPerformance Excellent Performance

Competent Performance

Pro�cient Performance

Room for Improvement

Second Reponse: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%) * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is e�ectively written in Standard Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

* Responses posted in the discussion may lack e�ective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%) * Responses posted in the discussion lack e�ective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited

Second Reponse: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%) * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) * does not meet requirement for full participation

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6670_Week4_Discussion_Rubric

EXIT