Discussion Assignment: Alzheimer’s Disease
Discussion Assignment: Alzheimer’s Disease
o Prepare
· Review the interactive media piece assigned by your Instructor.
· Reflect on the patient’s symptoms and aspects of the disorder presented in the interactive media piece.
· Consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with the symptoms of the patient case study you were assigned.
ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
· You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this patient. Reflect on potential co-morbid physical as well as patient factors that might impact the patient’s diagnosis and treatment.
Write a 1- to 2-page summary paper that addresses the following:
· Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.
· Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
· What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
· Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.
Interactive media piece case study below:
BACKGROUND
Mr. Akkad is a 76 year old Iranian male who is brought to your office by his eldest son for “strange behavior.” Mr. Akkad was seen by his family physician who ruled out any organic basis for Mr. Akkad’s behavior. All laboratory and diagnostic imaging tests (including CT-scan of the head) were normal.
According to his son, he has been demonstrating some strange thoughts and behaviors for the past two years, but things seem to be getting worse. Per the client’s son, the family noticed that Mr. Akkad’s personality began to change a few years ago. He began to lose interest in religious activities with the family and became more “critical” of everyone. They also noticed that things he used to take seriously had become a source of “amusement” and “ridicule.”
Over the course of the past two years, the family has noticed that Mr. Akkad has been forgetting things. His son also reports that sometimes he has difficult “finding the right words” in a conversation and then will shift to an entirely different line of conversation.
SUBJECTIVE
During the clinical interview, Mr. Akkad is pleasant, cooperative and seems to enjoy speaking with you. You notice some confabulation during various aspects of memory testing, so you perform a Mini-Mental State Exam. Mr. Akkad scores 18 out of 30 with primary deficits in orientation, registration, attention & calculation, and recall. The score suggests moderate dementia.
MENTAL STATUS EXAM
Mr. Akkad is 76 year old Iranian male who is cooperative with today’s clinical interview. His eye contact is poor. Speech is clear, coherent, but tangential at times. He makes no unusual motor movements and demonstrates no tic. Self-reported mood is euthymic. Affect however is restricted. He denies visual or auditory hallucinations. No delusional or paranoid thought processes noted. He is alert and oriented to person, partially oriented to place, but is disoriented to time and event [he reports that he thought he was coming to lunch but “wound up here”- referring to your office, at which point he begins to laugh]. Insight and judgment are impaired. Impulse control is also impaired as evidenced by Mr. Akkad’s standing up during the clinical interview and walking towards the door. When you asked where he was going, he stated that he did not know. Mr. Akkad denies suicidal or homicidal ideation. Discussion Assignment: Alzheimer’s Disease
Diagnosis: Major neurocognitive disorder due to Alzheimer’s disease (presumptive)
RESOURCES
§ Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (2002). Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Op
Options for Decisions below: Tips. Pick one that be a better option and answer all questions above. Need 3 x references
1. Begin Exalon 1.5 mg po bid with an increase to 3 mg po bid in two weeks( pt not feeling better).
2. Increase Exelon to 4.5mg orally bid( pt not feeling better)
3. Increase Exelon to 6mg po bid. ( Pt improved, dose could be maintained and checked in 4 wks, Namenda could also be added).
OR
1. Begin Aricept 5mg po bedtime ( pt no feeling better)
2. Increase Aricept to 10mg po ( Pt still not feeling Better NB Aricept at 5mg can be effective)
3. Continue Aricept 10 mg ( pt not any better) or ( 5mg with Namenda can be effective).
OR
1. Begin Razadyne 4 mg ( pt not feeling better)
2. Increase Razadyne to 24 mg extended release( Pt has seizures/SE)
3. Retart Razadyne ( pt has more s/e). Respidal not apprappriate.
Resource for references
Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2018). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice providers. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
· Chapter 10, “Basic Principles of Neuropharmacology” (pp. 73–77)
· Chapter 11, “Physiology of the Peripheral Nervous System” (pp. 79–90)
· Chapter 12, “Muscarinic Agonists and Antagonists” (pp. 91–107)
· Chapter 13, “Adrenergic Agonists” (pp. 109–119)
· Chapter 14, “Adrenergic Antagonists” (pp. 121–132)
· Chapter 15, “Indirect-Acting Antiadrenergic Agents” (pp. 133–137)
· Chapter 16, “Introduction to Nervous System Pharmacology” (pp. 139–141)
· Chapter 17, “Drugs for Parkinson Disease” (pp. 143–158)
· Chapter 18, “Drugs for Alzheimer Disease” (pp. 159–166)
· Chapter 19, “Drugs for Epilepsy” (pp. 167–189)
· Chapter 20, “Drugs for Muscle Spasm and Spasticity” (pp. 191–201)
· Chapter 57, “Drug Therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis” (pp. 629–641)
· Chapter 58, “Drug Therapy of Gout” (pp. 643–651)
· Chapter 59, “Drugs Affecting Calcium Levels and Bone Mineralization” (pp. 653–672)