NR 451 Week 2 Discussion Latest

The Clinical Question (graded)

Formulating the PICO question and appraisal of journal article evidence (graded)

Your capstone change project began last week when you identified your problem. This week you will continue to develop your project:

Formulate a significant clinical question that be the basis for your capstone change project.
Identify each PICO element in the question.
Relate how you developed the question?
Describe the importance of this question to your clinical practice.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Grading Rubric: Educating the staff Milestone #3

Criteria A
(92–100%)
Outstanding or highest level of performance B
(84–91%)
Very good or high level of performance C
(76–83%)
Competent or satisfactory level of performance F
(0–75%)
Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance Pts

The Problem

30 points * Summary of change model discussed
(1 slide)
* PICO question including elements (1 slide)
* Scope of the problem includes statistics and scope of problem to healthcare as a whole discussed. (1-2 slides)
* Team and stakeholders and their role/reason chosen
(1 slide)
(28–30 points) * One of the four elements was not thorough or did not include all appropriate elements.
(25–27 points) * Two of the four elements was not thorough or did not include all appropriate elements.
(23–24 points) * Three or more of the four elements was not thorough or did not include all appropriate elements.
(0–22 points) /30

The Evidence

40 points Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but synthesized into concepts. At least four sources used (at least three peer reviews and the other is a credible resource).
(3–4 slides)
(37–40 points) Four sources are discussed but evidence is not synthesized into themes learned.
(34–36 points) Four sources are discussed but evidence is not synthesized or summarized.
(30–33 points) Not all four sources are discussed. Summary of information not detailed or pertinent.
(0–29 points) /40
The Plan
40 points * Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical.
(1-2 slide)
* Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate.
(1 slide)
(37–40 points) *Plan of action described but not all important elements included.OR
* Timeline is present but doesn’t contain all elements.
(34–36 points) *Plan of action described but not all important elements included.AND
* Timeline is present but doesn’t contain all elements.
(30–33 points) Plan of action not present or not logical and complete. The timeline is not present or not appropriate and logical. NR 451 Entire Course Work Latest
(0–29 points) /40

The Nurse’s Role

30 points * The nurse’s role in the pilot plan is described and clear.
(1 slide)
* Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise.
(2-3 slides)
(28–30 points) * The nurses’ role is describes but not clear.
OR
* Procedures are discussed but not clear.
(25–27 points) * The nurses’ role is describes but not clear.
AND
* Procedures are discussed but not clear.
(23–24 points) Nurses’ roles are either absent or not appropriate. Procedures are either absent or not clearly written and complete.
(0–22 points) /30

Resources

20 points * Form for tracking the outcomes is included.
(1 slide)
* Resources the nurses will need are included. At least three resources are included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources the staff needs is included.
(1 slide)
(18–20 points) * Form for tracking outcomes included.
*At least three resources are included but the resources were not the best available resources.
(16–17 points) * Form for tracking outcomes included but was not well-developed.
*At least three resources are included but the resources were not the best available resources.
(15 points) * Form for tracking outcomes either absent or not well-developed.
* Less than three appropriate and helpful resources were given.
(0–14 points) /20

Summary

10 points Summary slide reiterates the problem and purpose of the plan along with the measurable goals. (1-2 slides)
(9–10 points) Summary does not clearly reiterate the problem OR purpose.
(8 points) Lacks reiteration of problem AND purpose.
(7 points) Summary slide not present or incomplete.
(0–6 points) /10

Overall presentation

25 points Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read.
(23–25 points) Presentation is accurate and covers most elements but lacks creativity.
(21–22 points) Presentation lacks flow and creativity or is difficult to follow.
(19–20 points) Presentation lacks any attempt at organization and comes across as chaotic.
(0–18 points) /25. NR 451 Entire Course Work Latest

Mechanics

30 points Includes title slide (3 points)
Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct.
(9 points)
References properly cited within the paper.
(6 points)
Reference page includes all citations.
(6 points)
Evidence of spell and grammar check.
(6 points)
(28–30 total points) Title slide incomplete
Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or sentence structure noted.
Citations are present but not correct format.
References are present, with minimal errors in format.
(25–27 points) Missing title slide
Multiple grammar and punctuation errors noted.
(23–24 points) Title slide and citations are missing.
References are missing or incomplete.
No evidence of proof-reading prior to submitting paper.
(0–2 points) /30
Total points: /225

Reference:

Dearholt, S. L., & Dang, D. (2012).Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice: Model and Guidelines(2nd ed.).Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.