PHIL 347 Week 2 Case Study Latest

Deliverables:

1. Abortion is murder, because murder is intentionally killing an innocent person. Therefore, abortion is wrong.

Explicit premises:

Implicit premises:

1. The rate of drowning increases with the rate of ice cream eating. Therefore, ice cream eating leads to drowning.

Explicit premises:

Implicit premises:

Determine whether the conclusion follows from the premises:

1. No cats are pleasant creatures. This is a mouse. Since it is not a cat, it is a pleasant creature.

Determine whether the argument is sound or unsound. Then determine whether each argument is valid or invalid.

1. All cats are feral. Tabitha is a cat. Tabitha is feral.

Show that the argument is invalid.

1. Using the Counterexample Method, show that the argument’s conclusion does not follow:

“If I score an A on the test, then I will pass the class.” “I passed the class!” “Therefore I scored an A on the test.”

Identify both the explicit and implicit premises of the argument presented. Assess whether the premises of the argument presented should be accepted or rejected.

1. Killing people is always wrong. Euthanasia is an example of one person killing another. Therefore, it is clear that euthanasia is wrong, and should continue to be illegal.

Explicit premises:

Implicit premises:

Assessment of premises:

Submit your assignment to the Dropbox, located at the top of this page. For instructions on how to use the Dropbox, read these .equella.ecollege.com/file/8ff9f27a-3772-48cf-9855-4bec4e6706bf/1/Dropbox.html”>step-by-step instructions.

See the Syllabus section “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” for due date information. PHIL 347 Week 2 Case Study Latest.

PHIL 347 Week 3 Case Study Latest

Deliverables:

1. Either you are with us or you are against us. Since you are not supporting our campaign by donating to it, you must be against our cause.

2. If we allow the government to ban assault weapons, we’ll have to allow them to ban handguns as well. And if we allow bans on handguns, we’ll have to allow bans on rifles. And what about knives? Aren’t they weapons too? We can’t just ban all the knives, so a ban on handguns would be idiotic.

3. Is anyone so stupid as to vote in favor of tax cuts for the wealthy?

4. If we raise taxes, then the economy will falter. We didn’t raise taxes, so clearly the economy will not falter.

5. There’s nothing wrong with citing information on the internet, because I read online that only true things can be posted there.

6. If the economy improves, housing prices will increase. House prices in the areas around New Orleans rose quickly after Hurricane Katrina, so the hurricane was obviously good for the local economy.

See the Syllabus section “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” for due date information. PHIL 347 Week 3 Case Study Latest

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

PHIL 347 Week 4 Case Study Latest

Deliverables

Answer the following questions in a 1/2 page to a page response. Keep in mind to identify unclear words or phrases, and propose ways in which those words or phrases may be clarified.

1. We might say a society is just if and only if it is organized so that the distribution of wealth within works to the benefit of the least well off. Do you agree with this conceptual theory of what a just society is, or not?

2. We might say that lethal force against an attacker is justified if a victim believes he or she will suffer serious physical harm. Is this a good definition of “justified”? Explain.

Submit your lab to the Dropbox, located at the top of this page. For instructions on how to use the Dropbox, read these .equella.ecollege.com/file/8ff9f27a-3772-48cf-9855-4bec4e6706bf/1/Dropbox.html”>step-by-step instructions.

See the Syllabus section “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” for due date information.

PHIL 347 Week 5 Case Study 1 Latest

Deliverables

Write a 1 1/2 page essay for each question, responding to the prompt. Each essay should have an introduction, thesis, body, and conclusion.

In the debate over gun control, it is often claimed that a gun kept in the home is 43 times more likely to be used in a suicide, homicide, or result in an accidental death than it is to be used to kill an intruder in self-defense.

(Kellerman, A. & Reay, D. (1986). Protection or peril? An analysis of firearm related deaths in the home. New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 1557-60.)

1. What is your position on gun control? Make an argument that is supported by at least three statistical findings.

2. Find an argument in the media that uses statistics for its premise on an issue other than gun control, and critique it. What requirements must it satisfy in order to be a successful argument? Include a copy of your source with your answer.

See the Syllabus section “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” for due date information.

PHIL 347 Week 5 Case Study 2 Latest

Deliverables

Utilizing the Web Links in Course Resources, identify a current argument in the popular media that incorporates or necessitates theoretical statements. Include a copy of the passage in which you locate the argument.

In a 3-page essay, describe the following:

How did you identify the theoretical statement in the argument?
Do you believe the theoretical statement should be accepted? Why, or why not?
If the statement should be accepted, demonstrate how it is immune to first-stage criticism.
If the statement should not be accepted, demonstrate how either first-stage or second-stage criticism of the theory undermines its veracity.

This essay will include a thesis statement regarding the author’s position on the theory. It will include an introduction that introduces the reader to the issues at stake, and a conclusion that summarizes the author’s findings.

See the Syllabus section “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” for due date information.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

PHIL 347 Week 6 Case Study Latest

Deliverables:

It is often claimed that smoking causes cancer. This is usually presented as a reason why people should either give up smoking, or else not start smoking. It is sometimes combined with other claims about smoking, such as that it is expensive or that it will lead to the deterioration of one’s looks.

1. What sort of argument would claim that a link exists between smoking and cancer? What would make this a stronger argument? What would weaken it?

2. What type of argument could this become once other claims are added to it? How would this latter type of argument be assessed?

3. Would either type of argument prove definitely that one should not smoke? Why or why not?

Write a four-page essay that answers these questions. Be clear to differentiate between the first given argument and the other arguments that you would construct. While a thesis for this essay is not imperative, the essay should include an introduction and conclusion.

See the Syllabus section “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” for due date information.