PHL 251 Week 4 Team Assignment – Evaluate Creative Thinking

PHL 251 Week 4 Team Assignment – Evaluate Creative Thinking

PHL 251 Week 4 Team Assignment – Evaluate Creative Thinking

Resources: Individual assignments from Week Two and Ch. 13 of Thinking

Write a combined paper from the individual team member notes of week 3 (total word count should be no more than 500 words for the entire paper) in which you evaluate your team member’s metaphors according to the criteria listed in Week Three Learning Team Instructions.

o   Refer to the questions in Ch. 13: “Testing Against our Thinking Bases,” in order to understand these terms and complete this assignment.

  • Perception
  • Personal Barriers
  • Language
  • Feelings
  • Creative Thinking

Summarize the team’s summaries and compile them into one cohesive paper.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Format your paper according to APA standards.

PHL 251 Week 4 Individual Assignment Applying Problem Solving Paper

Resources: Ch. 10–12 of the text, personal experiences

Choose two different real-world problems you have encountered. The problems should be chosen with the intention of applying persuasive thinking as a solution to one and scientific thinking as a solution to the other.

Applying Problem Solving

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you provide the following:

  • A description of each of the problem situations
  • An explanation of using persuasive thinking to solve the first problem
  • An explanation of using scientific thinking to solve the second problem

Summarize the solutions to each problem with a description of how the solution will solve the problem.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

PHL 251 Week 4 DQ 1

Post a 150- to 200-word response to the following discussion question by clicking on Reply: What role does critical thinking play in decision making?

PHL 251 Week 4 DQ 2

Post a 150- to 200-word response to the following discussion question by clicking on Reply:

During a persuasive argument, how can the needs and concerns of the audience be met while still meeting the objective of the argument? Provide at least one example.