NRS 451V Week 2 Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management

Details for NRS 451V Week 2 Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management:

In this assignment, you will be writing a 1,000-1,250-word essay describing the differing approaches of nursing leaders and managers to issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

1. Select an issue from the following list: nursing shortage and nurse turn-over, nurse staffing ratios, unit closures and restructuring, use of contract employees (i.e., registry and travel nurses), continuous quality improvement and patient satisfaction, and magnet designation.

2. Compare and contrast how you would expect nursing leaders and managers to approach your selected issue. Support your rationale by using the theories, principles, skills, and roles of the leader versus manager described in your readings.

3. Identify the approach that best fits your personal and professional philosophy of nursing and explain why the approach is suited to your personal leadership style.

4. Use at least two references other than your text and those provided in the course.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This NRS 451V Week 2 Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this NRS 451V Week 2 Effective Approaches in Leadership and Managementassignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR – NRS 451V Week 2

Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management

NRS 451v Week 3 Executive Summary Benchmark Assessment

Executive Summary (Benchmark Assessment)

Details for NRS 451v Week 3 Executive Summary Benchmark Assessment Paper:

The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by CCNE and AACN using non-traditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, their specific care discipline and their local communities.

In this assignment, you will select a program, quality improvement initiative, or other project from your place of employment. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (850-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which they will make their decision to fund your program or project. The summary should include:

The purpose of the program or project.

The target population or audience.

The benefits of the program or project

The cost or budget justification.

The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated.

Share your written proposal with your manager, supervisor or other colleague in a formal leadership position within a health care organization. Request their feedback using the following questions as prompts:

Do you believe the proposal would be approved if formally proposed?

What are some strengths and weaknesses of the proposal?

In addition to submitting this assignment in the LoudCloud dropbox, email a copy of your submission to RNBSNclientcare@gcu.edu.

Submit the written proposal along with the “Executive Summary Feedback Form.”

Prepare this NRS 451v Week 3 Executive Summary Benchmark Assessment Paper according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This NRS 451v Week 3 Executive Summary Benchmark Assessment Paper uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

NRS 451v Week 4 Organizational Values Presentation GC

Organizational Values Presentation (Benchmark Assessment)

NRS 451V Week 2 Effective Approaches in Leadership and Management

Details:

Prepare a 10-minute presentation (10-15 slides, not including title or reference slide) on organizational culture and values.

Describe how alignment between the values of an organization and the values of the nurse impact nurse engagement and patient outcomes.

Discuss how an individual can use effective communication techniques to overcome workplace challenges, encourage collaboration across groups, and promote effective problem solving.

Identify a specific instance from your own professional experience in which the values of the organization and the values of the individual nurses did or did not align. Describe the impact this had on nurse engagement and patient outcomes.

While APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Health Organization Case Study

Details:

Research a health care organization or a network that spans several states within the U.S. (Example: United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Healthcare, etc.).

Harvard Business Review Online and Hoover’s Company Records, found in the GCU Library, are useful sources. You may also find pertinent information on your organization’s webpage.

Review “Singapore Airlines Case Study.”

Prepare a 1,000-1,250-word paper that focuses on the organization or network you have selected.

Your essay should assess the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade, and include a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Week 4 Capstone Project Milestone 2:

Design for Change Proposal Guidelines

Capstone Project Milestone 2:

Design for Change Proposal Guidelines

Purpose

You are to create a Design for Change proposal inclusive of your Practice Issue and Evidence Summary worksheet from your Capstone Project Milestone 1. Your plan is to convince your management team of a nursing problem you have uncovered and you feel is significant enough to change the way something is currently practiced. In the event you are not currently working as a nurse, please use a hypothetical clinical situation you experienced in nursing school, or nursing education issue you identified in your nursing program.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

CO1: Applies the theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines to individuals, families, aggregates, and communities from entry to the healthcare system through long-term planning. (PO #1)
CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO #2)

Due Date

Milestone 2 consists of the proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Submit this assignment to the Dropbox by the end of Week 4.

Points

Milestone 2 is worth 225 points.

Directions

Create a proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Open the NR451_Milestone2_Design_Proposal_ template in Course Resources to create your paper. You will include the information from Milestone 1, your practice issue and evidence summary worksheets, as you compose this proposal. Your plan is to convince your management team of a practice problem you have uncovered that is significant enough to change current practice.
The format for this proposal will be a paper following the Publication manual of APA 6^th
The paper is to be four- to six-pages excluding the Title page and Reference page.
As you organize your information and evidence, include the following topics.
1. Introduction:Write an introduction but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63). Introduce the reader to the plan with evidence-based problem identification and solution.
2. Change Model Overview: Overview of the ACE Star model (the model we have been discussing this session); define the scope of the EBP; identify the stakeholders, and determine the responsibility of the team members.
3. Evidence: Conduct internal and external searches of evidence; integrate and summarize the evidence summary worksheet from Milestone 1; develop a recommendation for change.
4. Translation: develop a hypothetical action plan; include measurable outcomes, reporting to stakeholders; identify next steps and disseminate the findings.
5. Conclusion: Provide a clear and concise summary, inclusive of the problem issue, the five points of the ACE Star change model; and ways to maintain the change plan.

Citations and References must be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source. Scholarly sources are expected, which means using peer-reviewed journals and credible websites.
Tables and Figures may be added as appropriate to the project. They should be embedded within the body of the paper (see your APA manual for how to format and cite). Creating tables and figures offers visual aids to the reader and enhances understanding of your literature review and design for change.

Grading Criteria: Design for Change Capstone Project

Category	Points	%	Description
Introduction	25	11%	Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, with evidence-based problem identification and potential solutions clearly identified.
Change Model Overview	50	22%	Practice issue is identified and is nursing focused. An overview of the ACE Star model is given. The need for change is evident. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and their role are identified and discussed. Scope of the problem is identified. State how nurses should use this model as a guide to facilitate change.
Evidence	50	22%	Evidence is provided thru basic information that indicates a change is needed. For example, there have been 6 urinary tract infections over the last two months and there were none present the last two years at the same time period. What are some of the evidence-based interventions you discovered in your Evidence Summary that do you plan to use?
Translation	50	22%	Activities to achieve the final steps of change are fully described. What is needed to achieve. How do you translate what information you have gathered into practice? How do you inform staff? What is your plan of action to pilot the plan? What is the timeline?
Conclusion	25	11%	Clear, solid summary summarizing the key points and steps of the change plan is included; ways to sustain the change plan are described.
APA Format	25	11%	Minimal errors.
Total	225 points	100%

Grading Rubric: Capstone Project Milestone 2

Assignment Criteria	A (100%)Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance	B (88%)Exceeds Very good or high level of performance	C (80%)Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance	NI (38%)Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance	F (0%)Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance
Introduction 25 points	Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, and evidence-based. Potential interventions clearly identified.25 points ☐	Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, and evidence-based solutions identified but not clear. 22 points ☐	Introduction to the plan is provided; however, the plan is not nursing focused and evidence-based solutions are not convincing.20 points ☐	Introduction lacks evidence to support need for change and/or potential solution is not evidenced-based. 10 points ☐	Introduction is missing. 0 points ☐
Change Model Overview50 points	Practice issue is nursing focused. Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is present. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed. Scope of problem is identified. 50 points ☐	Practice issue is nursing focused. Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed. Scope of problem is identified. 44 points ☐	Practice issue is nursing focused. Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present. Stakeholders are not identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed but without detail. Scope of problem is identified. 40 points ☐	Practice issue is nursing focused. Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present. Stakeholders are not identified. Practice area, team members and role are not discussed. Scope of problem is identified. 19 points ☐	Change Model Overview is missing 0 points ☐
Evidence 50 points	Evidence is thoroughly provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.50 points ☐	Evidence is briefly provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Some of the interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.44 points ☐	Evidence is vaguely provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Some of the interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.40 points ☐	Evidence is provided thru basic information of the current problem but is not convincing. Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are not used in planning for change.19 points ☐	Evidence is not provided thru basic information of the current problem; there is no indication of change; there no interventions listed from the Evidence Summary. 0 points ☐
Translation 50 points	Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described. Ways to translate evidence into practice is discussed. Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action and timeline are discussed. 50 points ☐	Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described. How to translate evidence into practice is discussed but is not clear.Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action and timeline are discussed. 44 points ☐	Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described. How to translate evidence into practice is not discussed. Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action but timeline is not mentioned. 40 points ☐	Activities to achieve final steps of change are described but not in detail.How to translate evidence into practice is not discussed. Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action but timeline is not mentioned. 19 points ☐	Activities for final change plan is missing. Translation of evidence into practice is missing.0 points ☐
Conclusion25 points	Detailed summary of main points.Ways to sustain plan are thoroughly described.25 points ☐	Summary of main points is brief.Ways to sustain plan are briefly described.22 points ☐	Summary of main points is vague.Ways to sustain plan are vaguely described.20 points ☐	Summary of main points is vague.Ways to sustain change are not described.10 points ☐	Summary is missing. There is no plan to sustain change.0 points ☐
APA formatting, scholarly writing25 points	APA format sixth edition.Grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling correct.References, citations correct. Paper formatted in APA format. No errors to one error. 25 points ☐	Two to three errors.22 points ☐	Four to five errors.20 points ☐	Six to seven errors.10 points ☐	More than seven errors.0 points ☐
	Total Points