Capella The CapraTeks Workplace Discrimination and Human Resource Essay

REVISE MY EXISTING PAPER BASED ON FEEDBACK

Instructions

Based on the CapraTek: Workplace Discrimination incident, restructure CapraTek’s HRMM policies and procedures to better protect the organization and its employees.

Address the following elements in your 4–5 page report:

Analyze how the policies and mission are communicated at CapraTek (Employee handbook, meetings, training, medium, location, format, et cetera).

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

Analyze the content within CapraTek’s training events and artifacts.

Evaluate CapraTek’s reporting and investigation procedures in relation to how they protect both the company and employees.

Analyze how effective your HR management plan job aid would have been if applied to CapraTek. (Identify how you would gauge the effectiveness of the Community Hospital job aid, if it were applied to this CapraTek incident.)

Modify CapraTek’s HR management plan, where needed, to better protect the organization and its employees.

Review the HRM Case Analysis Scoring Guide to ensure that you have completely addressed the grading criteria of this assessment before submitting it for a grade.

4 attachments

Slide 1 of 4

attachment_1

attachment_1
attachment_2

attachment_2
attachment_3

attachment_3
attachment_4

attachment_4

UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW

Running head: CAPRATEK’S WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION CapraTek’s Workplace Discrimination Bryan Nickerson Human Resource Legal Challenges and Solutions Lynn Macbeth Capella University 1 CAPRATEK’S WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION 2 The Analysis of Communication and Mission at CapraTek According to CapraTek Activity, CapraTek uses various communication channels that include the following. Firstly, CapraTek uses email to communicate. An incident where an email has been used to communicate a concern is when the Senior HR Generalist, Evelyn Unger communicated about workplace discrimination. In the email, Evelyn shares the experience where employees were involved in misconduct. The concern was that these employees were watching the videos on one of the employee’s tablets within the lunchroom when they were on a break. The complaint was raised by some of