Assignment: Interview with Informatics Nurse Specialist

Permalink: https://ulcius.com/assignment-inter…nurse-specialist/

Interview with Informatics

Nurse Specialist (INS)

GuidelineswithRubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is for the learner to:

· Evaluate the extent to which the INS functionsas member, leader, and/or decision-maker of an Interdisciplinary and/or interprofessional team;

· Compare interviewee functional roles against NI functional roles Identified within the current scope and standards of informatics practice statement for the INS;

· Examine three nursing-informatics (NI) functional roles that the INS demonstrates in clinical practice;

· Summarize the link between nursing theory and nursing informatics roles; and

· Summarize insights gained from the interview in relationship to the INS role and practice

DUE DATE

Sunday,11:59p.m.MTattheendofWeek2

Total Points Possible: 150

Directions

1. Interview (by telephone or in person) a master or doctorally prepared informatics nurse specialist. Summarize the interview in a three to four-page report, including:

2. Identify the degree of interdisciplinary and interprofessional collaboration the INS has.

3. Identify the INS’ predominant functional areas of practice and how these compare with NI functional areas defined in the American Nurses Association’s 2015 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice (2nd ed.).

4. Compare what you learned in the interview to what you have read.

5. Provide a link between nursing theory and nursing informatics roles.

Criteria for Content

1. Introductionpresentsthetopicof the scope and standards of informatics practice inclusive offunctionalareas, thekeysectionsofthepaper,andtheinterviewee without disclosing either their name or the name of their organization.

2. Key elements of the interview are summarized with an emphasis on describing the NI functional roles in which the interviewee practices that include functional areas, practice within the scope and standards of nursing informatics practice, and degree to which the interviewee functions as a member of an interdisciplinary/interprofessional team as an MSN level leader and decision-maker.

3. Scholarly, evidence-based resources will support content, opinions, and conclusions. Differences and similarities between the interview information collected and published descriptions are analyzed and paraphrased in the student’s own words, with scholarly citation and references, including support for opinions.

4. Conclusion includes the student’s unique insights about what was learned from writing the assignment.

CriteriaforFormatandSpecialInstructions

1. Requiredtextsmaybeusedasreferences in addition to evidence-based, scholarly sources no older than three years.

2. Allaspects ofthepapermustbein 6th edition, 7th printingAPAformat including appropriate attribution of ideas, information, opinions, and content.

3. Thepaper(excludingthetitlepageandreferencepage)shouldnotbelongerthan four pages or less than three pages.

4. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and writing style is consistent with formal academic writing.

Directions and Assignment Criteria

Assignment Criteria

Points

Description

Introduction

23%

Theintroductionintroducesthetopicof the scope and standards of informatics practice, inclusive ofNIfunctional areas,andtheintervieweenamesthekeysections ofthepaper. No names are included to protect identity and privacy.

Interview Results

23%

Keyelementsoftheinterviewaresummarized withanemphasisondescribingthree primaryNIfunctionalareas, practice within the scope and standards of NI practiceinwhichtheintervieweepractices, as well as interdisciplinary/interprofessional efforts.Scholarlysupportispresent.

Analysis

23%

Differencesandsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctionalareas and scope and standards of practice andactualpracticeof the intervieweeareclearlyanalyzedinthestudent’sownwords,with depth,and analysisissupportedbyscholarlysources.

Conclusion

22%

Concludingstatementsclearly includethewriter’suniqueinsightsaboutNIfunctionalareasandthepracticeofnursinginformaticsgained fromcompletingthisassignment.

APA Formats

Text,title page,andreferencepage(s)areconsistentwithAPAformat(zero to threeerrors).

Citations

Ideasandinformationfrom othersourcesarecited andarecited correctly(zero to three errors).

Writing Mechanics. Assignment: Interview with Informatics Nurse Specialist

Rulesofgrammar,spelling,wordusage,andpunctuationareconsistentwith formalwrittenwork(zero to threeerrors), paper meets page length.

Total

150

100%

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Exceptional

(100%)

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

(88%)

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

(80%)

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

(38%)

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

(0)

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Introduction

34 Points

30 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Introduction clearly introducesthetopicofNIfunctionalareas, identifiestheintervieweebyrole (not name)andtypeoforganization, andnamesthekeysectionsofthepaper.

Introduction clearlypresentsonlytwo oftherequired sections.

Introduction clearlypresentsonlyone oftherequired sections.

Introduction doesnotclearly addressanyofthethreerequiredsections.

Nointroductionispresent.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Interview

Results

34 Points

30 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Key elements of the interview are summarized with the three primary NI functional areas of INS practice described clearly.

Exemplars of interdisciplinary/interprofessional collaboration are included.

Scholarly support.is present and relevant. .

Key elements of the interview are summarized. The NI functional areas in which the interviewee practices are mentioned but not clearly described.

Interdisciplinary/ interprofessional collaboration is mentioned but not elaborated.

Scholarly sources are provided but support is not clearly stated

Functional areas of practice are not addressed

There is no mention of Interdisciplinary/ interprofessional role or collaboration.

Scholarly sources are present but support is not well-established.

Key elements of the interview are not present,

the interview summary lacks scholarly support.

Interview results are not present.

Analysis

34 Points

30 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional areasandactual practiceofthose functionalareasareclearlyanalyzedin-depth.

Theanalysisissupportedby

scholarlysources.

Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional areasandactual practiceofthose functionalareasareanalyzedsuperficially. Analysisissupportedbyscholarlysources.

Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublished descriptionsofNIfunctionalareasandactualpracticeofthosefunctionalareasarepresentedbutnotanalyzed.Scholarlysupportispresent.

Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional areasandactual practiceofthose functionalareasare

notpresented,

ORscholarlysupportisnotpresentinthissection.

An analysis is not present.

Conclusion

33 Points

29 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Concluding statements clearly include the writer’s unique insights about NI functional areas and the practice of nursing informatics gained from completing this assignment.

Concluding statements include statements about NI functional areas and the practice of nursing informatics, but lack clear presentation of the writer’s unique insights gained from completing this assignment.

Conclusion partially addresses either functional areas or writer’s insights.

Conclusion is present but does not address either functional areas or writer’s insights.

Conclusion is not present.

APA Formats

5 Points

4 Points

3Points

0 Points

Zero to twoerrors ofAPAformatintext,title page,andreference page(s).

Three to fiveAPAformaterrors intext,titlepage, andreference page(s).

Six to sevenAPAformaterrors intext,titlepage, orreference page(s).

Nine or moreAPAformaterrorsin text,titlepage,or referencepages(s).

Citations

5 Points

4 Points

3Points

0 Points

Allideasandinformation fromothersourcesarecited.

One to threeinstancesinwhichideasandinformationfrom othersourcesarenotcited or lackmatching.references

Four to sixinstancesinwhichideasandinformationfrom othersourcesarenotcitedorlackmatching references.

Seven or moreinstancesinwhichideasandinformation fromothersourcesarenotcited or lack matching references.

Writing Quality

5 Points

4 Points

3Points

0 Points

Zero to three errorsingrammar, spelling,wordusage, punctuation,andotherelementsofwritingAND

papermeetslength requirement

Four to sixerrors ingrammar,spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andotherelementsofwriting ANDpapermeetslength requirements

Seven to nineerrors ingrammar,spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andotherelementsofwriting ANDpapermeetslength. requirements

Ten or moreerrorsingrammar, spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andother elementsofwriting, OR

paperfails tomeetlength requirements.

150 Total Points _____ of 150 Points